Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Gurmeet Kaur and Asha Singh v. Project Category-Un-Register Imperia Structures Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/105855/2023 · Bench 2 · for the complainant

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Sajid Akhtar and Nilofar Yasmin v. Project Category-Un-Register Imperia Structures Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/105831/2023 · Bench 2 · for the complainant

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

D. SONIKA SHARMA and D. V. RAVI SHANKAR v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/105426/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

In this regard it is necessary to mention that the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in its decision at page 234 and paragraph 440 of Civil Appeal No. 940 /207, Bikram Chatterjee and others versus Union of India and others, has defined force majeure as follows:- "Force majeure shall mean a case of war, flood, drought, fire, cyclo

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Sushil Kumar Gupta and Meenu Gupta v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/105409/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Anil Kumar Sagar v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/105404/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent

In this regard it is necessary to mention that the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in its decision at page 234 and paragraph 440 of Civil Appeal No. 940 /207, Bikram Chatterjee and others versus Union of India and others, has defined force majeure as follows:- "Force majeure shall mean a case of war, flood, drought, fire, cyclo

Undated·Final order·Verified

Namrata Srivastava v. Ats Dreamzone Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/89022/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Complaint No.: NCR44/0i/89022/2022 Namrata Srivastava Versus A.T.S. Dreamzone Pvt. Ltd. In the case in question, in the order dated 22.05.2023 passed under Section 34, in paragraph 4 of the order, by a clerical error the date for giving possession of the unit to the complainant has been recorded as 34.07.2022. In respe

Undated·Final order·Verified

Namrata Srivastava v. Ats Dreamzone Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/89022/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Present: Dr. Deepak Swaroop Saxena, Member; T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint No.: NCR44/0/89022/2022 Namrata Srivastava Versus A.T.S. Dreamzone Pvt. Ltd. The present complaint application has been instituted by the complainant against the opposite party seeking possession and interest for the delayed period. In brief, th

Undated·Final order·Verified

Anita Singh v. Alpine Infraprojects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/01/88190/2022 · Bench 2 · for the respondent

The respondent also said that because the complainant did not pay the amount due under the agreed terms and conditions recorded in the agreement, the unit was cancelled, and the amount will be refunded to the complainant as per the terms agreed in the agreement. The respondent said that the relief sought by the complai

Undated·Final order·Verified

Satish Pathak v. Alpine Infraprojects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/01/87842/2022 · Bench 2 · for the respondent

The respondent also said that because the complainant did not pay the amount due under the agreed terms and conditions recorded in the agreement, the unit was cancelled, and the amount will be refunded to the complainant as per the terms agreed in the agreement. The respondent said that the relief sought by the complai

Undated·Final order·Verified

Mahipat Singh Tomar v. Alpine Infraprojects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/01/87802/2022 · Bench 2 · for the respondent

The respondent also said that because the complainant did not pay the amount due under the agreed terms and conditions recorded in the agreement, the unit was cancelled, and the amount will be refunded to the complainant as per the terms agreed in the agreement. The respondent said that the relief sought by the complai

Undated·Final order·Verified

Deepa Luthra v. Project Category-Un-Register PATEL ADVANCE JV

Complaint No. NCR144/01/69317/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

By filing a copy annexed to its written statement, the respondent has also stated that on 34.05.2044 the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority, taking cognizance of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, maintained the status quo on the allotted land, due to which construction of the project remained delayed;

Undated·Final order·Verified

Deepa Luthra v. Project Category-Un-Register PATEL ADVANCE JV

Complaint No. NCR144/01/69317/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Complaint No.: NCR444 /04 / 69347 / 202 Deepa Luthra Versus Patel Advance JV In the case in question the file was reserved for order. It is evident from perusal of the file that the Bench passed the following orders in this case on 48.04.2022 under Section [?] of the Act: (a) The respondent shall ensure that possession

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Suresh Kumar Kardar v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/69225/2021 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No.: NCRI44/0/69225/202I Suresh Kumar Karadar Versus La Residentia Developers Pvt. Ltd. The present file was reserved for order on 04.04.2022. Thereafter, on checking the RERA portal, the Bench came to know that proceedings relating to the project concerned are pending befo

Undated·Final order·Verified

Mr Sharad Gupta v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/68964/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint WST—NCRI44/0/68964/202 Shri Sharad Gupta Versus A.T.S. Realty Pvt. Ltd. In this case the file was reserved for order on 25.08.2022. Both parties were directed to file their written arguments by 40.09.2022, but neither party has filed any written arguments. The arguments of

Undated·Final order·Verified

Arti and Irfan Khan v. Granite Hill Properties Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/68622/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Arti and Irfan Khan v. Granite Hill Properties Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/68622/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Dhirender Pratap Singh v. Ajnara India Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/67977/2021 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Dhirender Pratap Singh v. Ajnara India Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/67977/2021 · for the respondent

passed by the Hon'ble “\ jreen Tribunal restraining all the builders in 2 Gautam Budh Nagar from extracting any quantity of underground water for the purposes of construction. That is is also worth mentioning that in the Writ Petition No 2737 of 207 titled "Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt & Ors Versus Union of India &

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Shikhar Gupta and Meena Gupta v. WTC Noida Development Company Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/01/136319/2026 · Bench 3 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

udit sawhney v. Granite Hill Properties Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/116716/2024 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Lokesh Bisht v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/1164/2020 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

In the complainant's complaint, the Bench passed the following orders on 30.42.2020: 4. The respondent is directed to complete all amenities in the complainant's unit in accordance with the agreement and ensure registration within 60 days. 2. Violation of this order shall be punishable under Section-63 and other releva

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Sanjay Nawani and Kajol Nawani v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/104761/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

In this regard it is necessary to mention that the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in its decision at page 234 and paragraph 440 of Civil Appeal No. 940 /207, Bikram Chatterjee and others versus Union of India and others, has defined force majeure as follows:- "Force majeure shall mean a case of war, flood, drought, fire, cyclo

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Mr. Manav Mehta v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/104104/2023 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Gurmeet Kaur and Asha Singh v. Project Category-Un-Register Imperia Structures Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/105855/2023 · Bench 2 · for the complainant

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Sajid Akhtar and Nilofar Yasmin v. Project Category-Un-Register Imperia Structures Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/105831/2023 · Bench 2 · for the complainant

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

D. SONIKA SHARMA and D. V. RAVI SHANKAR v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/105426/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

In this regard it is necessary to mention that the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in its decision at page 234 and paragraph 440 of Civil Appeal No. 940 /207, Bikram Chatterjee and others versus Union of India and others, has defined force majeure as follows:- "Force majeure shall mean a case of war, flood, drought, fire, cyclo

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Sushil Kumar Gupta and Meenu Gupta v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/105409/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Anil Kumar Sagar v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/105404/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent

In this regard it is necessary to mention that the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in its decision at page 234 and paragraph 440 of Civil Appeal No. 940 /207, Bikram Chatterjee and others versus Union of India and others, has defined force majeure as follows:- "Force majeure shall mean a case of war, flood, drought, fire, cyclo

Undated·Final order·Verified

Namrata Srivastava v. Ats Dreamzone Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/89022/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Complaint No.: NCR44/0i/89022/2022 Namrata Srivastava Versus A.T.S. Dreamzone Pvt. Ltd. In the case in question, in the order dated 22.05.2023 passed under Section 34, in paragraph 4 of the order, by a clerical error the date for giving possession of the unit to the complainant has been recorded as 34.07.2022. In respe

Undated·Final order·Verified

Namrata Srivastava v. Ats Dreamzone Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/89022/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Present: Dr. Deepak Swaroop Saxena, Member; T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint No.: NCR44/0/89022/2022 Namrata Srivastava Versus A.T.S. Dreamzone Pvt. Ltd. The present complaint application has been instituted by the complainant against the opposite party seeking possession and interest for the delayed period. In brief, th

Undated·Final order·Verified

Anita Singh v. Alpine Infraprojects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/01/88190/2022 · Bench 2 · for the respondent

The respondent also said that because the complainant did not pay the amount due under the agreed terms and conditions recorded in the agreement, the unit was cancelled, and the amount will be refunded to the complainant as per the terms agreed in the agreement. The respondent said that the relief sought by the complai

Undated·Final order·Verified

Satish Pathak v. Alpine Infraprojects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/01/87842/2022 · Bench 2 · for the respondent

The respondent also said that because the complainant did not pay the amount due under the agreed terms and conditions recorded in the agreement, the unit was cancelled, and the amount will be refunded to the complainant as per the terms agreed in the agreement. The respondent said that the relief sought by the complai

Undated·Final order·Verified

Mahipat Singh Tomar v. Alpine Infraprojects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/01/87802/2022 · Bench 2 · for the respondent

The respondent also said that because the complainant did not pay the amount due under the agreed terms and conditions recorded in the agreement, the unit was cancelled, and the amount will be refunded to the complainant as per the terms agreed in the agreement. The respondent said that the relief sought by the complai

Undated·Final order·Verified

Deepa Luthra v. Project Category-Un-Register PATEL ADVANCE JV

Complaint No. NCR144/01/69317/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

By filing a copy annexed to its written statement, the respondent has also stated that on 34.05.2044 the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority, taking cognizance of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, maintained the status quo on the allotted land, due to which construction of the project remained delayed;

Undated·Final order·Verified

Deepa Luthra v. Project Category-Un-Register PATEL ADVANCE JV

Complaint No. NCR144/01/69317/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Complaint No.: NCR444 /04 / 69347 / 202 Deepa Luthra Versus Patel Advance JV In the case in question the file was reserved for order. It is evident from perusal of the file that the Bench passed the following orders in this case on 48.04.2022 under Section [?] of the Act: (a) The respondent shall ensure that possession

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Suresh Kumar Kardar v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/69225/2021 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No.: NCRI44/0/69225/202I Suresh Kumar Karadar Versus La Residentia Developers Pvt. Ltd. The present file was reserved for order on 04.04.2022. Thereafter, on checking the RERA portal, the Bench came to know that proceedings relating to the project concerned are pending befo

Undated·Final order·Verified

Mr Sharad Gupta v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/68964/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint WST—NCRI44/0/68964/202 Shri Sharad Gupta Versus A.T.S. Realty Pvt. Ltd. In this case the file was reserved for order on 25.08.2022. Both parties were directed to file their written arguments by 40.09.2022, but neither party has filed any written arguments. The arguments of

Undated·Final order·Verified

Arti and Irfan Khan v. Granite Hill Properties Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/68622/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Arti and Irfan Khan v. Granite Hill Properties Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/68622/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Dhirender Pratap Singh v. Ajnara India Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/67977/2021 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Dhirender Pratap Singh v. Ajnara India Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/67977/2021 · for the respondent

passed by the Hon'ble “\ jreen Tribunal restraining all the builders in 2 Gautam Budh Nagar from extracting any quantity of underground water for the purposes of construction. That is is also worth mentioning that in the Writ Petition No 2737 of 207 titled "Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt & Ors Versus Union of India &

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Shikhar Gupta and Meena Gupta v. WTC Noida Development Company Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/01/136319/2026 · Bench 3 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

udit sawhney v. Granite Hill Properties Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/116716/2024 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Lokesh Bisht v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/1164/2020 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

In the complainant's complaint, the Bench passed the following orders on 30.42.2020: 4. The respondent is directed to complete all amenities in the complainant's unit in accordance with the agreement and ensure registration within 60 days. 2. Violation of this order shall be punishable under Section-63 and other releva

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Sanjay Nawani and Kajol Nawani v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/104761/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

In this regard it is necessary to mention that the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in its decision at page 234 and paragraph 440 of Civil Appeal No. 940 /207, Bikram Chatterjee and others versus Union of India and others, has defined force majeure as follows:- "Force majeure shall mean a case of war, flood, drought, fire, cyclo

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Mr. Manav Mehta v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/104104/2023 · for the respondent