Undated·Final order·Verified

Ashish Ahuja v. K2N Infra India Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/71192/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Present: T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint No.: NCR44/03/7 92/202 [?] Ashish Ahuja Versus K.2.N Infra India Pvt. Ltd. The matter in question was reserved for orders, and the advocates of both parties appeared. The submissions of both parties were heard and the case file was perused. It is evident from perusal of the case

Undated·Final order·Verified

Sunil Kumar Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/52553/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the complainant

Undated·Final order·Verified

Ravindra Arora v. Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority

Complaint No. NCR144/03/51466/2020 · Bench 1 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Undated·Final order·Verified

Deepanshu Agarwal and Lokesh Mohan Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/51460/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No. [?]44/03/5460/2020 Deepanshu Agarwal and Lokesh Mohan Agarwal Versus Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. In the matter in question, the Bench, after hearing the arguments of both parties, reserved the file for orders on 43.09.2022, and both parties were directed t

Undated·Final order·Verified

Deepanshu Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/51457/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No. [?]44/03/5457,2020 Deepanshu Agarwal Versus Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. In the matter in question, the Bench, after hearing the arguments of both parties, reserved the file for orders on 73.09.2022, and both parties were directed to file written arguments

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Mrs. Seema Khalid raza and Mr. Khaild Raza v. Pinnacle Superstructures Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/118587/2024 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Usha Khajuria and Naval Kumar Khajuria v. Imperia Structures Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/107099/2023 · Bench 2 · for the complainant

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Naved Afaque and Kauser Afaque v. Imperia Structures Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/106850/2023 · Bench 2 · for the complainant

U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Hearing Bench-4 22 - Complaint Number :— NCRI44/03/06850/2023 Naved Afaq and Kausar Afaq Versus Imperia Structures Limited Date :- 46/40 / 2023 The complainant's case under Section-34 was presented through video conferencing. On call, both parti

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Anil Pandita v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90036/2022 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Anil Pandita v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90036/2022 · for the respondent

Authority to re-set the completion duration and other timme related obligations of the Respondent in relation to

Undated·Final order·Verified

Sandeep Bhattacharjee v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90033/2022 · for the respondent

Authority to re-set the completion duration and other timme related obligations of the Respondent in relation to

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Sandeep Bhattacharjee v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90033/2022 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Vipin Verma v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90031/2022 · for the respondent

Authority to re-set the completion duration and other timme related obligations of the Respondent in relation to

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Vipin Verma v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90031/2022 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Anish Kumar Saini v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90030/2022 · for the respondent

Authority to re-set the completion duration and other timme related obligations of the Respondent in relation to

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Anish Kumar Saini v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90030/2022 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Priydarshan Jha and Suoneeta Jha v. M/s. Jss Buildcon Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/70423/2021 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

In support of its statement, the opposite party has filed photocopies of its reply, account statement, and orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble NGT and the NCLT. Both parties were heard and the case file was perused. On the basis of the parties' pleadings, the following issues have been framed for considera

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Rakesh Kumar Verma v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/69639/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Present: T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint WAM:—NCR44/02/69639/2024 Rakesh Kumar Verma vs. Sikka Infrastructure Private Limited In the case in question the file was reserved for order. It is seen from perusal of the file that the opposite party has not complied with the order dated 25.04.2022 passed earlier under section

Undated·Final order·After reservation·Verified

Rakesh Kumar Verma v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/69639/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Bench-2 Present: Shri Balvinder Kumar, Member Complaint No.: NCR44/02/69639/2024 Rajesh [?] Verma vs. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. The present complaint petition has been filed by the complainant against the opposite party seeking possession a

Undated·Final order·After reservation·Verified

Rakesh Kumar Koul v. Oasis Realtech Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/69509/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

(c) The complainant, filing a written statement, states: "That as per the Clause 27 of Builder Buyer Agreement (BBA) dated 8.07.208 executed against the aforesaid booked unit, 'The company undertakes to offer the possession of the apartment duly completed to the buyer within 8 months from the date of execution of this

Undated·Final order·After reservation·Verified

Rakesh Kumar Koul v. Oasis Realtech Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/69509/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The present complaint is dismissed. The file be consigned to the office record. (Bhanu Pratap Singh) (Member) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority Gautam Buddh Nagar

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Rakesh Kumar Koul v. Oasis Realtech Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/69509/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Present: T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint PWIT—NCR44/02/69509/2022 Rakesh Kumar Kaul vs. Oasis Realtech Private Limited In the case in question the file was reserved for order, and both parties appeared. The [?] of both parties were heard. The file is reserved for order. It is seen from perusal of the file that the oppos

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Pooja v. Futureworld Greenhomes Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/117514/2024 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Ashish Ahuja v. K2N Infra India Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/71192/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Present: T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint No.: NCR44/03/7 92/202 [?] Ashish Ahuja Versus K.2.N Infra India Pvt. Ltd. The matter in question was reserved for orders, and the advocates of both parties appeared. The submissions of both parties were heard and the case file was perused. It is evident from perusal of the case

Undated·Final order·Verified

Sunil Kumar Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/52553/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the complainant

Undated·Final order·Verified

Ravindra Arora v. Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority

Complaint No. NCR144/03/51466/2020 · Bench 1 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Undated·Final order·Verified

Deepanshu Agarwal and Lokesh Mohan Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/51460/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No. [?]44/03/5460/2020 Deepanshu Agarwal and Lokesh Mohan Agarwal Versus Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. In the matter in question, the Bench, after hearing the arguments of both parties, reserved the file for orders on 43.09.2022, and both parties were directed t

Undated·Final order·Verified

Deepanshu Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/51457/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No. [?]44/03/5457,2020 Deepanshu Agarwal Versus Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. In the matter in question, the Bench, after hearing the arguments of both parties, reserved the file for orders on 73.09.2022, and both parties were directed to file written arguments

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Mrs. Seema Khalid raza and Mr. Khaild Raza v. Pinnacle Superstructures Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/118587/2024 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Usha Khajuria and Naval Kumar Khajuria v. Imperia Structures Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/107099/2023 · Bench 2 · for the complainant

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Naved Afaque and Kauser Afaque v. Imperia Structures Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/106850/2023 · Bench 2 · for the complainant

U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Hearing Bench-4 22 - Complaint Number :— NCRI44/03/06850/2023 Naved Afaq and Kausar Afaq Versus Imperia Structures Limited Date :- 46/40 / 2023 The complainant's case under Section-34 was presented through video conferencing. On call, both parti

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Anil Pandita v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90036/2022 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Anil Pandita v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90036/2022 · for the respondent

Authority to re-set the completion duration and other timme related obligations of the Respondent in relation to

Undated·Final order·Verified

Sandeep Bhattacharjee v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90033/2022 · for the respondent

Authority to re-set the completion duration and other timme related obligations of the Respondent in relation to

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Sandeep Bhattacharjee v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90033/2022 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Vipin Verma v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90031/2022 · for the respondent

Authority to re-set the completion duration and other timme related obligations of the Respondent in relation to

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Vipin Verma v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90031/2022 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Anish Kumar Saini v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90030/2022 · for the respondent

Authority to re-set the completion duration and other timme related obligations of the Respondent in relation to

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Anish Kumar Saini v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/90030/2022 · for the respondent

Undated·Final order·Verified

Priydarshan Jha and Suoneeta Jha v. M/s. Jss Buildcon Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/02/70423/2021 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

In support of its statement, the opposite party has filed photocopies of its reply, account statement, and orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble NGT and the NCLT. Both parties were heard and the case file was perused. On the basis of the parties' pleadings, the following issues have been framed for considera

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Rakesh Kumar Verma v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/69639/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Present: T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint WAM:—NCR44/02/69639/2024 Rakesh Kumar Verma vs. Sikka Infrastructure Private Limited In the case in question the file was reserved for order. It is seen from perusal of the file that the opposite party has not complied with the order dated 25.04.2022 passed earlier under section

Undated·Final order·After reservation·Verified

Rakesh Kumar Verma v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/69639/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Bench-2 Present: Shri Balvinder Kumar, Member Complaint No.: NCR44/02/69639/2024 Rajesh [?] Verma vs. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. The present complaint petition has been filed by the complainant against the opposite party seeking possession a

Undated·Final order·After reservation·Verified

Rakesh Kumar Koul v. Oasis Realtech Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/69509/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

(c) The complainant, filing a written statement, states: "That as per the Clause 27 of Builder Buyer Agreement (BBA) dated 8.07.208 executed against the aforesaid booked unit, 'The company undertakes to offer the possession of the apartment duly completed to the buyer within 8 months from the date of execution of this

Undated·Final order·After reservation·Verified

Rakesh Kumar Koul v. Oasis Realtech Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/69509/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The present complaint is dismissed. The file be consigned to the office record. (Bhanu Pratap Singh) (Member) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority Gautam Buddh Nagar

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Rakesh Kumar Koul v. Oasis Realtech Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/69509/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Present: T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint PWIT—NCR44/02/69509/2022 Rakesh Kumar Kaul vs. Oasis Realtech Private Limited In the case in question the file was reserved for order, and both parties appeared. The [?] of both parties were heard. The file is reserved for order. It is seen from perusal of the file that the oppos

Undated·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Pooja v. Futureworld Greenhomes Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/117514/2024 · for the respondent