5 Jan 2021·Final order·Verified

Nasimuddin Ansari v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/1257/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

In paragraph 2 of its written reply, the opposite party has stated: "In Phase-I we have obtained OC. The physical possession of flat is going on and as on date handed over of flats has been done in 972 flats. In Phase-II, Total [?] Tower No. 19 to Tower No. 29, finishing work is under process and we will start giving p

17 Dec 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Manish Kumar Kanth & Madhupma Rani v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. 9201819252 · for the respondent

Authority by promoter.—If any promoter, who fails to comply with, or contravenes any of the orders or directions of the Authority, he shall be liable to a penalty for every day during which such default continues, which may cumulatively extend up to five per cent., of the estimated cost of the real estate project as de

17 Dec 2020·Final order·Verified

Manish Kumar Kanth & Madhupma Rani v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. 9201819252 · for the respondent

to be paid. That order was affirmed by this Court in 2

8 Dec 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Vimal Nagpal v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/52641/2020 · for the respondent

2 Dec 2020·Final order·Verified

Varisha Shafique v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/52648/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent

25 Nov 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Manju Bala v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/02/49586/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

In support of its statement, the opposite party has filed photocopies of the project Bench's orders, a board resolution and an account statement. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. On the basis of the parties' pleadings, the following issues were framed for consideration: 4. Does this Authority have juri

25 Nov 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Manju Bala v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/02/49586/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Complaint No.: NCR745/02/49586/2020 Manju Bala vs. Rise Projects Pvt. Ltd. The case in question was reserved for orders. From a perusal of the case file it is evident that the Bench passed the following orders under Section 34 of the RERA Act on 24.:4.2020: 1. The opposite party is directed to complete all the faciliti

6 Nov 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

gaurav awasthi v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. 420189793 · for the respondent

3 Nov 2020·Final order·Verified

Ravindra Arora v. Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority

Complaint No. NCR144/03/51466/2020 · Bench 1 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

14 Oct 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Ruhi Bhatia v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/54604/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

m0iz0 Hkw&lEink fofu;ked izkf/kdj.k] {ks=h; dk;kZy;] xkSrecq)uxjA ihB&2 mifLFkfr%& Jh cyfoUnj dqekj] lnL; Øe f'kdk;r la[;k f'kdk;rdrkZx.k ;wfuV la0 /kujkf'k la0 1. NCR144/06/53995/2020 uouhr dqekj Honour-404 29,21,516 /- 2. NCR144/06/54405/2020 nhid pkSjfl;k ,oa Dignity-401 26,41,705 /- xhfrdk pkSjfl;k 3. NCR144/06/545

14 Oct 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Raag Sethi v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/54590/2020 · Bench 3 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

m0iz0 Hkw&lEink fofu;ked izkf/kdj.k] {ks=h; dk;kZy;] xkSrecq)uxjA ihB&2 mifLFkfr%& Jh cyfoUnj dqekj] lnL; Øe f'kdk;r la[;k f'kdk;rdrkZx.k ;wfuV la0 /kujkf'k la0 1. NCR144/06/53995/2020 uouhr dqekj Honour-404 29,21,516 /- 2. NCR144/06/54405/2020 nhid pkSjfl;k ,oa Dignity-401 26,41,705 /- xhfrdk pkSjfl;k 3. NCR144/06/545

30 Sep 2020·Final order·Verified

Tulsidas T. Suryavanshi v. Patel Advance Jv S-406 L.G

Complaint No. NCR144/12/0357/2019 · Bench 3 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

approx 25% land of the project effective from GNIDA letter 08-0- 200. It is therefore the Allotment date should be read 24-4-206 inspite of the 02-04-203 and accordingly completion date of the possession of the flat should be readable and extended for such further period after expiry of 46 months as per the allotment l

25 Sep 2020·Final order·Verified

Arpit Agarwal v. Project Category-Un-Register LOGIX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD

Complaint No. NCR144/08/0383/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Hearing Bench-0[?]A Shri Rajeev Kumar, Chairman Complaint No. —NCRI44/08/0383/209 Arpit Agarwal Versus M/s Logix Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. The present complaint application has been filed by the complainant against the respondent, seekin

25 Sep 2020·Final order·Verified

Sunil Kumar Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/52553/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the complainant

25 Sep 2020·Final order·Verified

Deepanshu Agarwal and Lokesh Mohan Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/51460/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

7. The present complaint petition has been filed by the complainant against the opposite party seeking possession and interest for the delayed period. In brief, the complainant's case is that the complainant booked Plot No. 78! in the opposite party's project UCHDPL-8000-35 Plots 4, and paid Rs. 44,86,267/- in installm

25 Sep 2020·Final order·Verified

Deepanshu Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/51457/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

7. The present complaint petition has been filed by the complainant against the opposite party seeking possession and interest for the delayed period. In brief, the complainant's case is that the complainant booked Plot No. 78! in the opposite party's project UCHDPL-8000-35 Plots 4, and paid Rs. 44,86,267/- in installm

23 Sep 2020·Final order·Verified

Usha Rani v. Project Category-Un-Register Ansal Landmark Townships Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/12/1202/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

27 Aug 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Shreepal v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/12/0157/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

It is also noteworthy that an agreement was executed between the parties, which is signed by both parties, from which it can be determined that both parties accepted the terms of the said agreement. In clause-26 of the agreement, there is a provision for payment of an amount at the rate of Rs. 5,/- per sq. ft. per mont

27 Aug 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Sunil Mittal v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/11/1259/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Bench-2 Present: Shri Balvinder Kumar, Member Complaint No.: NCR44//4259/209 Sunil Mittal Versus Sikka Infrastructure [?] The present complaint petition has been instituted by the complainant against the respondent for possession, interest for t

30 Jul 2020·Final order·Verified

Omkar Nath Tandon v. Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/10/0730/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

[Page 3] Further, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in its judgment in Civil Appeal No. 940 / 2047, Vikram Chatterjee and Others vs. Union of India and Others, at page 234 and [?] of the judgment, has defined force majeure as follows: "Force majeure shall mean a case of war, flood, drought, fire, cyclone, earthquake or any ot

30 Jun 2020·Final order·Verified

Sudhir Gupta v. Wave Megacity Centre Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/11/0271/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

The present complaint petition has been instituted by the complainant against the respondent [?] for possession, correction of demands, interest for the delayed period, or otherwise refund of the amount deposited with interest. In brief, the complainant states that they booked unit no. &-604 in the respondent's project

29 Jun 2020·Final order·Verified

Nisha Ray v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/01/1031/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Complaint No.: NCR445 / 04 / 4034 / 2020 Nisha Rai Versus Rise Projects Pvt. Ltd. In the present case the file was reserved for orders. From a perusal of the file it is evident that the Bench, under Section 34 of the Act, passed the following orders in this case on 22.06.2020: "4- The opposite party is directed to comp

29 Jun 2020·Final order·Verified

Nisha Ray v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/01/1031/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

In support of its statement, the opposite party has filed photocopies of the allotment letter / apartment buyer agreement. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the following issues have been framed for consideration: 4. Does this Authority have jurisdiction to

5 Jan 2021·Final order·Verified

Nasimuddin Ansari v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/1257/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

In paragraph 2 of its written reply, the opposite party has stated: "In Phase-I we have obtained OC. The physical possession of flat is going on and as on date handed over of flats has been done in 972 flats. In Phase-II, Total [?] Tower No. 19 to Tower No. 29, finishing work is under process and we will start giving p

17 Dec 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Manish Kumar Kanth & Madhupma Rani v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. 9201819252 · for the respondent

Authority by promoter.—If any promoter, who fails to comply with, or contravenes any of the orders or directions of the Authority, he shall be liable to a penalty for every day during which such default continues, which may cumulatively extend up to five per cent., of the estimated cost of the real estate project as de

17 Dec 2020·Final order·Verified

Manish Kumar Kanth & Madhupma Rani v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. 9201819252 · for the respondent

to be paid. That order was affirmed by this Court in 2

8 Dec 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Vimal Nagpal v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/52641/2020 · for the respondent

2 Dec 2020·Final order·Verified

Varisha Shafique v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/52648/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent

25 Nov 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Manju Bala v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/02/49586/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

In support of its statement, the opposite party has filed photocopies of the project Bench's orders, a board resolution and an account statement. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. On the basis of the parties' pleadings, the following issues were framed for consideration: 4. Does this Authority have juri

25 Nov 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Manju Bala v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/02/49586/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Complaint No.: NCR745/02/49586/2020 Manju Bala vs. Rise Projects Pvt. Ltd. The case in question was reserved for orders. From a perusal of the case file it is evident that the Bench passed the following orders under Section 34 of the RERA Act on 24.:4.2020: 1. The opposite party is directed to complete all the faciliti

6 Nov 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

gaurav awasthi v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. 420189793 · for the respondent

3 Nov 2020·Final order·Verified

Ravindra Arora v. Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority

Complaint No. NCR144/03/51466/2020 · Bench 1 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

14 Oct 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Ruhi Bhatia v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/54604/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

m0iz0 Hkw&lEink fofu;ked izkf/kdj.k] {ks=h; dk;kZy;] xkSrecq)uxjA ihB&2 mifLFkfr%& Jh cyfoUnj dqekj] lnL; Øe f'kdk;r la[;k f'kdk;rdrkZx.k ;wfuV la0 /kujkf'k la0 1. NCR144/06/53995/2020 uouhr dqekj Honour-404 29,21,516 /- 2. NCR144/06/54405/2020 nhid pkSjfl;k ,oa Dignity-401 26,41,705 /- xhfrdk pkSjfl;k 3. NCR144/06/545

14 Oct 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Raag Sethi v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/54590/2020 · Bench 3 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

m0iz0 Hkw&lEink fofu;ked izkf/kdj.k] {ks=h; dk;kZy;] xkSrecq)uxjA ihB&2 mifLFkfr%& Jh cyfoUnj dqekj] lnL; Øe f'kdk;r la[;k f'kdk;rdrkZx.k ;wfuV la0 /kujkf'k la0 1. NCR144/06/53995/2020 uouhr dqekj Honour-404 29,21,516 /- 2. NCR144/06/54405/2020 nhid pkSjfl;k ,oa Dignity-401 26,41,705 /- xhfrdk pkSjfl;k 3. NCR144/06/545

30 Sep 2020·Final order·Verified

Tulsidas T. Suryavanshi v. Patel Advance Jv S-406 L.G

Complaint No. NCR144/12/0357/2019 · Bench 3 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

approx 25% land of the project effective from GNIDA letter 08-0- 200. It is therefore the Allotment date should be read 24-4-206 inspite of the 02-04-203 and accordingly completion date of the possession of the flat should be readable and extended for such further period after expiry of 46 months as per the allotment l

25 Sep 2020·Final order·Verified

Arpit Agarwal v. Project Category-Un-Register LOGIX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD

Complaint No. NCR144/08/0383/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Hearing Bench-0[?]A Shri Rajeev Kumar, Chairman Complaint No. —NCRI44/08/0383/209 Arpit Agarwal Versus M/s Logix Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. The present complaint application has been filed by the complainant against the respondent, seekin

25 Sep 2020·Final order·Verified

Sunil Kumar Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/52553/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the complainant

25 Sep 2020·Final order·Verified

Deepanshu Agarwal and Lokesh Mohan Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/51460/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

7. The present complaint petition has been filed by the complainant against the opposite party seeking possession and interest for the delayed period. In brief, the complainant's case is that the complainant booked Plot No. 78! in the opposite party's project UCHDPL-8000-35 Plots 4, and paid Rs. 44,86,267/- in installm

25 Sep 2020·Final order·Verified

Deepanshu Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/51457/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

7. The present complaint petition has been filed by the complainant against the opposite party seeking possession and interest for the delayed period. In brief, the complainant's case is that the complainant booked Plot No. 78! in the opposite party's project UCHDPL-8000-35 Plots 4, and paid Rs. 44,86,267/- in installm

23 Sep 2020·Final order·Verified

Usha Rani v. Project Category-Un-Register Ansal Landmark Townships Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/12/1202/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

27 Aug 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Shreepal v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/12/0157/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

It is also noteworthy that an agreement was executed between the parties, which is signed by both parties, from which it can be determined that both parties accepted the terms of the said agreement. In clause-26 of the agreement, there is a provision for payment of an amount at the rate of Rs. 5,/- per sq. ft. per mont

27 Aug 2020·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Sunil Mittal v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/11/1259/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Bench-2 Present: Shri Balvinder Kumar, Member Complaint No.: NCR44//4259/209 Sunil Mittal Versus Sikka Infrastructure [?] The present complaint petition has been instituted by the complainant against the respondent for possession, interest for t

30 Jul 2020·Final order·Verified

Omkar Nath Tandon v. Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/10/0730/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

[Page 3] Further, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in its judgment in Civil Appeal No. 940 / 2047, Vikram Chatterjee and Others vs. Union of India and Others, at page 234 and [?] of the judgment, has defined force majeure as follows: "Force majeure shall mean a case of war, flood, drought, fire, cyclone, earthquake or any ot

30 Jun 2020·Final order·Verified

Sudhir Gupta v. Wave Megacity Centre Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/11/0271/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

The present complaint petition has been instituted by the complainant against the respondent [?] for possession, correction of demands, interest for the delayed period, or otherwise refund of the amount deposited with interest. In brief, the complainant states that they booked unit no. &-604 in the respondent's project

29 Jun 2020·Final order·Verified

Nisha Ray v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/01/1031/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Complaint No.: NCR445 / 04 / 4034 / 2020 Nisha Rai Versus Rise Projects Pvt. Ltd. In the present case the file was reserved for orders. From a perusal of the file it is evident that the Bench, under Section 34 of the Act, passed the following orders in this case on 22.06.2020: "4- The opposite party is directed to comp

29 Jun 2020·Final order·Verified

Nisha Ray v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/01/1031/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

In support of its statement, the opposite party has filed photocopies of the allotment letter / apartment buyer agreement. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the following issues have been framed for consideration: 4. Does this Authority have jurisdiction to