2 Jun 2022·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Humayun Akhtar v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/04/93666/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

27 May 2022·Final order·Verified

Prashant Kumar Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/07/78907/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No.:- [NCR?] 44/07/78907/202] [?] Kumar Agarwal Versus Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. In the case in question, the Bench, after hearing the submissions of both parties, reserved the file for orders on 22.4.2022. On that date, the opposite party stated that it had

23 May 2022·Final order·Verified

Lallan Prasad Yadav v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/10/83861/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Sl. No. | Complaint No. | Tower and Unit No. 1. NCRI44/0/8386/202] | Lallan Prasad Yadav | T-37/302 2. [?]44/0/494]/202] | Arvind Kumar Singhal | T-33 [?] 304 3. [?]44/06/5229/202] | Ashwini Kumar Mishra | T-8/002 vs. La Residencia Developers Pvt. Ltd. The complaints have been filed

23 May 2022·Final order·Verified

Arvind Kumar Singhal v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/10/49411/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Sl. No. | Complaint No. | Tower and Unit No. 1. NCRI44/0/8386/202] | Lallan Prasad Yadav | T-37/302 2. [?]44/0/494]/202] | Arvind Kumar Singhal | T-33 [?] 304 3. [?]44/06/5229/202] | Ashwini Kumar Mishra | T-8/002 vs. La Residencia Developers Pvt. Ltd. The complaints have been filed

23 May 2022·Final order·Verified

Ashwani Kumar Mishra v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/06/75229/2021 · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Sl. No. | Complaint No. | Tower and Unit No. 1. NCRI44/0/8386/202] | Lallan Prasad Yadav | T-37/302 2. [?]44/0/494]/202] | Arvind Kumar Singhal | T-33 [?] 304 3. [?]44/06/5229/202] | Ashwini Kumar Mishra | T-8/002 vs. La Residencia Developers Pvt. Ltd. The complaints have been filed

12 May 2022·Final order·After reservation·Verified

Himanshu Pandey v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/79910/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No.: NCR44/08/7990/202I Himanshu Pandey vs. La Residencia Developers [?] The present complaint petition has been filed by the complainant seeking refund, with interest, of the amount deposited with the opposite party. In brief, the complainant states that he booked unit no.

23 Apr 2022·Final order·Verified

Chandra Mohan Shekhar And Mohan Lal v. Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/75140/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

That now the construction work is completed and the respondent has already applied for the part occupancy certificate before the concerned authority on 28-03-2049. The respondent has submitted the application for the occupancy certificate before the concerned authority and is now waiting for their approval [?]. [?] is

13 Apr 2022·Final order·Verified

Mrs Tajinder Kaur v. PATEL ADVANCE JV Registered Office

Complaint No. NCR144/06/76228/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent

(c) The complainant, presenting a written statement dated 44.44.2024, has stated that, as per paragraph 6 of the respondent's written reply, the [?] Court passed the [?] order dated 08.0.20I0. However, during the stay order the respondent demanded payment from the complainant against the unit. The respondent has theref

12 Apr 2022·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Neelam Sharma v. Ajnara India Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/67961/2021 · for the respondent

passed by the Hon'ble “\ jreen Tribunal restraining all the builders in 2 Gautam Budh Nagar from extracting any quantity of underground water for the purposes of construction. That is is also worth mentioning that in the Writ Petition No 2737 of 207 titled "Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt & Ors Versus Union of India &

11 Apr 2022·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Upendra Kumar Singh v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/04/0693/2019 · for the respondent

was affirmed by this Court in 2075 in Savitri Devi v. State of U.P. (2075) 7 SCC 27, There was no interim Stay granted by the High Court on construction work, is made clear by the Noida and Greater Noida authorities. There was no room to entertain any doubt as to the fact whether for a particular village the acquisitio

31 Mar 2022·Final order·Verified

Snehlata Tomar v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/04/74269/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No. — NCRI45/04/74269/2024 Siddharth Tomar Versus Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. The present complaint application has been instituted by the complainant for grant of possession and interest for the delayed period. In brief, the complainant states that plot numbe

26 Mar 2022·Final order·Verified

Ravinder Kumar Bansal v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/12/0126/2019 · for the respondent

26 Mar 2022·Final order·Verified

Gulamuddin Ansari v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/11/1281/2019 · for the respondent

26 Mar 2022·Final order·Verified

Reena Gupta C/O Bal Krishan Gupta v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/10/0739/2019 · for the respondent

7 Mar 2022·Final order·Verified

Ashivani v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/68918/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The complainant's complaint was presented for final arguments through video conferencing on 07-06-2024. On being called, the complainant appeared in person. The opposite party/builder was absent. The file was reserved for order on 07-06-2024 itself. The main objective of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act

7 Mar 2022·Final order·Verified

Ashivani v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/68918/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No.: (2)44/0/689] 8/202] Ashwini Versus La Residentia Developers [?] The complaint application has been instituted by the complainant against the opposite party, seeking offer of possession together with interest for the delayed period, and a direction to the opposite party

17 Feb 2022·Final order·Verified

Pankaj Agrawal v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/09/82760/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Sl. No. | Complaint No. | Complainant | Tower and Unit No. 1 | NCR 44/08/78680/202 | Mohit Sagar | Gu-297904 [?] 3 | NCR44/09/82760/202 | Pankaj Agarwal | V-24902 [?] 2 | NCR44/07/77445/202l | Puneet Kumar Singh Tevatia | P-23/203 4 | NCR44/08/79966/202 | Anil Prasad Srivastava | 3V/

17 Feb 2022·Final order·Verified

Pankaj Agrawal v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/09/82760/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No. [?] NCR44/09/82760/2024 Pankaj Agarwal vs. La Residencia Developers Pvt. Ltd. In the case in question, after hearing the arguments of both parties, the Bench reserved the file for orders on 05.06.2023. On that date, during the hearing, the complainant requested that the

17 Feb 2022·Final order·Verified

Avinash Khare and Varsha Khare v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/80164/2021 · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Sl. No. | Complaint No. | Complainant | Tower and Unit No. 1 | NCR 44/08/78680/202 | Mohit Sagar | Gu-297904 [?] 3 | NCR44/09/82760/202 | Pankaj Agarwal | V-24902 [?] 2 | NCR44/07/77445/202l | Puneet Kumar Singh Tevatia | P-23/203 4 | NCR44/08/79966/202 | Anil Prasad Srivastava | 3V/

17 Feb 2022·Final order·Verified

Anil Prasad Shrivastava v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/79966/2021 · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Sl. No. | Complaint No. | Complainant | Tower and Unit No. 1 | NCR 44/08/78680/202 | Mohit Sagar | Gu-297904 [?] 3 | NCR44/09/82760/202 | Pankaj Agarwal | V-24902 [?] 2 | NCR44/07/77445/202l | Puneet Kumar Singh Tevatia | P-23/203 4 | NCR44/08/79966/202 | Anil Prasad Srivastava | 3V/

17 Feb 2022·Final order·Verified

S Kedhar v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/07/77384/2021 · Bench 1 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Sl. No. | Complaint No. | Complainant | Tower and Unit No. 1 | NCR 44/08/78680/202 | Mohit Sagar | Gu-297904 [?] 3 | NCR44/09/82760/202 | Pankaj Agarwal | V-24902 [?] 2 | NCR44/07/77445/202l | Puneet Kumar Singh Tevatia | P-23/203 4 | NCR44/08/79966/202 | Anil Prasad Srivastava | 3V/

7 Feb 2022·Final order·Verified

Nalin Sharma v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/59136/2020 · for the respondent

7 Feb 2022·Final order·Verified

Vikram Narula v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/07/77480/2021 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

2 Jun 2022·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Humayun Akhtar v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/04/93666/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

27 May 2022·Final order·Verified

Prashant Kumar Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/07/78907/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No.:- [NCR?] 44/07/78907/202] [?] Kumar Agarwal Versus Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. In the case in question, the Bench, after hearing the submissions of both parties, reserved the file for orders on 22.4.2022. On that date, the opposite party stated that it had

23 May 2022·Final order·Verified

Lallan Prasad Yadav v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/10/83861/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Sl. No. | Complaint No. | Tower and Unit No. 1. NCRI44/0/8386/202] | Lallan Prasad Yadav | T-37/302 2. [?]44/0/494]/202] | Arvind Kumar Singhal | T-33 [?] 304 3. [?]44/06/5229/202] | Ashwini Kumar Mishra | T-8/002 vs. La Residencia Developers Pvt. Ltd. The complaints have been filed

23 May 2022·Final order·Verified

Arvind Kumar Singhal v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/10/49411/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Sl. No. | Complaint No. | Tower and Unit No. 1. NCRI44/0/8386/202] | Lallan Prasad Yadav | T-37/302 2. [?]44/0/494]/202] | Arvind Kumar Singhal | T-33 [?] 304 3. [?]44/06/5229/202] | Ashwini Kumar Mishra | T-8/002 vs. La Residencia Developers Pvt. Ltd. The complaints have been filed

23 May 2022·Final order·Verified

Ashwani Kumar Mishra v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/06/75229/2021 · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Sl. No. | Complaint No. | Tower and Unit No. 1. NCRI44/0/8386/202] | Lallan Prasad Yadav | T-37/302 2. [?]44/0/494]/202] | Arvind Kumar Singhal | T-33 [?] 304 3. [?]44/06/5229/202] | Ashwini Kumar Mishra | T-8/002 vs. La Residencia Developers Pvt. Ltd. The complaints have been filed

12 May 2022·Final order·After reservation·Verified

Himanshu Pandey v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/79910/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No.: NCR44/08/7990/202I Himanshu Pandey vs. La Residencia Developers [?] The present complaint petition has been filed by the complainant seeking refund, with interest, of the amount deposited with the opposite party. In brief, the complainant states that he booked unit no.

23 Apr 2022·Final order·Verified

Chandra Mohan Shekhar And Mohan Lal v. Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/75140/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

That now the construction work is completed and the respondent has already applied for the part occupancy certificate before the concerned authority on 28-03-2049. The respondent has submitted the application for the occupancy certificate before the concerned authority and is now waiting for their approval [?]. [?] is

13 Apr 2022·Final order·Verified

Mrs Tajinder Kaur v. PATEL ADVANCE JV Registered Office

Complaint No. NCR144/06/76228/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent

(c) The complainant, presenting a written statement dated 44.44.2024, has stated that, as per paragraph 6 of the respondent's written reply, the [?] Court passed the [?] order dated 08.0.20I0. However, during the stay order the respondent demanded payment from the complainant against the unit. The respondent has theref

12 Apr 2022·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Neelam Sharma v. Ajnara India Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/67961/2021 · for the respondent

passed by the Hon'ble “\ jreen Tribunal restraining all the builders in 2 Gautam Budh Nagar from extracting any quantity of underground water for the purposes of construction. That is is also worth mentioning that in the Writ Petition No 2737 of 207 titled "Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt & Ors Versus Union of India &

11 Apr 2022·Final order·Appeared·Verified

Upendra Kumar Singh v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/04/0693/2019 · for the respondent

was affirmed by this Court in 2075 in Savitri Devi v. State of U.P. (2075) 7 SCC 27, There was no interim Stay granted by the High Court on construction work, is made clear by the Noida and Greater Noida authorities. There was no room to entertain any doubt as to the fact whether for a particular village the acquisitio

31 Mar 2022·Final order·Verified

Snehlata Tomar v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/04/74269/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No. — NCRI45/04/74269/2024 Siddharth Tomar Versus Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. The present complaint application has been instituted by the complainant for grant of possession and interest for the delayed period. In brief, the complainant states that plot numbe

26 Mar 2022·Final order·Verified

Ravinder Kumar Bansal v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/12/0126/2019 · for the respondent

26 Mar 2022·Final order·Verified

Gulamuddin Ansari v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/11/1281/2019 · for the respondent

26 Mar 2022·Final order·Verified

Reena Gupta C/O Bal Krishan Gupta v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/10/0739/2019 · for the respondent

7 Mar 2022·Final order·Verified

Ashivani v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/68918/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The complainant's complaint was presented for final arguments through video conferencing on 07-06-2024. On being called, the complainant appeared in person. The opposite party/builder was absent. The file was reserved for order on 07-06-2024 itself. The main objective of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act

7 Mar 2022·Final order·Verified

Ashivani v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/68918/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No.: (2)44/0/689] 8/202] Ashwini Versus La Residentia Developers [?] The complaint application has been instituted by the complainant against the opposite party, seeking offer of possession together with interest for the delayed period, and a direction to the opposite party

17 Feb 2022·Final order·Verified

Pankaj Agrawal v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/09/82760/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Sl. No. | Complaint No. | Complainant | Tower and Unit No. 1 | NCR 44/08/78680/202 | Mohit Sagar | Gu-297904 [?] 3 | NCR44/09/82760/202 | Pankaj Agarwal | V-24902 [?] 2 | NCR44/07/77445/202l | Puneet Kumar Singh Tevatia | P-23/203 4 | NCR44/08/79966/202 | Anil Prasad Srivastava | 3V/

17 Feb 2022·Final order·Verified

Pankaj Agrawal v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/09/82760/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No. [?] NCR44/09/82760/2024 Pankaj Agarwal vs. La Residencia Developers Pvt. Ltd. In the case in question, after hearing the arguments of both parties, the Bench reserved the file for orders on 05.06.2023. On that date, during the hearing, the complainant requested that the

17 Feb 2022·Final order·Verified

Avinash Khare and Varsha Khare v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/80164/2021 · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Sl. No. | Complaint No. | Complainant | Tower and Unit No. 1 | NCR 44/08/78680/202 | Mohit Sagar | Gu-297904 [?] 3 | NCR44/09/82760/202 | Pankaj Agarwal | V-24902 [?] 2 | NCR44/07/77445/202l | Puneet Kumar Singh Tevatia | P-23/203 4 | NCR44/08/79966/202 | Anil Prasad Srivastava | 3V/

17 Feb 2022·Final order·Verified

Anil Prasad Shrivastava v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/79966/2021 · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Sl. No. | Complaint No. | Complainant | Tower and Unit No. 1 | NCR 44/08/78680/202 | Mohit Sagar | Gu-297904 [?] 3 | NCR44/09/82760/202 | Pankaj Agarwal | V-24902 [?] 2 | NCR44/07/77445/202l | Puneet Kumar Singh Tevatia | P-23/203 4 | NCR44/08/79966/202 | Anil Prasad Srivastava | 3V/

17 Feb 2022·Final order·Verified

S Kedhar v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/07/77384/2021 · Bench 1 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Sl. No. | Complaint No. | Complainant | Tower and Unit No. 1 | NCR 44/08/78680/202 | Mohit Sagar | Gu-297904 [?] 3 | NCR44/09/82760/202 | Pankaj Agarwal | V-24902 [?] 2 | NCR44/07/77445/202l | Puneet Kumar Singh Tevatia | P-23/203 4 | NCR44/08/79966/202 | Anil Prasad Srivastava | 3V/

7 Feb 2022·Final order·Verified

Nalin Sharma v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/59136/2020 · for the respondent

7 Feb 2022·Final order·Verified

Vikram Narula v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/07/77480/2021 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent