⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,221–1,240 · Page 62 of 382
Supreme Court of India2019
(2020) 20 SCC 760
A party having an interest in the dispute or having authority to appoint sole arbitrator is disqualified from appointing arbitrator unilaterally.
Supreme Court of India2019
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,221–1,240 · Page 62 of 382
Supreme Court of India2019
(2020) 20 SCC 760
A party having an interest in the dispute or having authority to appoint sole arbitrator is disqualified from appointing arbitrator unilaterally.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2020) 13 SCC 337
Triple test for bail applied to Section 483 BNSS (special powers of High Court/Sessions Court).
Supreme Court of India2019
(2019) 4 SCC 163
Scope of interference under Section 37 is narrower than Section 34; appellate court cannot travel beyond grounds in Section 34 or reassess evidence.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2020) 8 SCC 531
Commercial wisdom of Committee of Creditors (CoC) is supreme; adjudicating authority cannot interfere with commercial decisions; operational creditors need not be paid equally to financial creditors.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2019) 4 SCC 197
Presumption under Section 139 applies even if blank cheque leaf was voluntarily signed and handed over by drawer; drawer liable unless debt disproved.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2019) 5 SCC 418
Principles governing rebuttal of presumption under Section 139; accused can rebut by relying on prosecution evidence or probabilities without stepping into witness box.
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority10 Apr 2018
Complaint No. 920171565
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, 06 जगदीश चन्द्र बोस मार्ग, लालबाग, लखनऊ। शिकायत संख्या-920474565 दिनांक 06 अप्रैल 2048 श्री शिव शंकर चौधरी, मेसर्स गार्डनिया एम्स डेवलपर्स प्रा0लि0, बी0-8, फ्लैट नं0-202, बनाम टावर नं0-34, फ्लैट नं0-604, गार्डनिया एम्स ग्लोरी, कामन deer गेम्स विलेज, सेक्टर-46, नोएडा। नई दिल्ली-4400…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority1 Sep 2018
Complaint No. 320188581
भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, उत्त्तर प्रदेश नामित प्राधिकारी / उपाध्यक्ष हापुड़-पिलखुवा विकास प्राधिकरण, हापुड़ प्राधिकारी / उपाध्यक्ष हापुड़-पिलखुवा विकास प्राधिकरण, हापुड़ शिकायत संख्या:- 320488584 श्री पुनीत सिंह बनाम मै0 ला रेसीडेन्सिया डवलपर्स प्राएलि0 निर्णय यह शिकायत श्री पुनीत सिंह पुत्र श्री विजेन्द्र सिंह ते…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority21 Jul 2018
Complaint No. 320187681
भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, उत्तर प्रदेश नामित प्राधिकारी / उपाध्यक्ष हापुड़-पिलखुवा विकास प्राधिकरण, हापुड़ प्राधिकारी / उपाध्यक्ष हापुड़- विकास प्राधिकरण, हापुड़ शिकायत संख्या:- 3208768॥ श्रीमती धनेश्वरी देवी cart बनाम मै0 रेडिकॉन इन्फास्ट्रक्चर एण्ड हाउसिंग प्राएलि0 निर्णय यह शिकायत श्रीमती धनेश्वरी देवी ध्यानी पत…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority27 Aug 2018
Complaint No. 220187419
मेरठ विकास प्राधिकरण, मेरठ | उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण शिकायत संख्या:--220487449 दिनांक : 23 अगस्त, 2048 शिकायतकर्ता: विकासकर्ता: श्री यतीश अग्रवाल, मै0 पुष्पांजलि कन्स0 प्रा0 लि0, निवासी-फ्लैट-42042,एटीएस एडवान्टेज, 46-ए, प्रभुनगर, जयपुर हाउस, अहिंसा खण्ड, गाजियाबाद | आगरा--282040 | आदेश दी रियल wee (रैगुलेश…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority3 May 2018
Complaint No. 1220174937
शिकायत संख्या- 220:74937 feqia 04 मई 20:8 Mr. Rahul Sharma & Col. A.K. Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd. Sharma 8-55, Nar Vihar-4 34 बनाम Tower No. 34, Flat No. 604, Noida Dadri Noida Common Wealth Games Village New Delhi- 0092 आदेश भू-सम्पदा (विनियमन एवं विकास) अधिनियम, 206 की धारा-3 के अन्तर्गत प्रस्तुत शिकायत संख्य…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority15 Jun 2018
Complaint No. 120186000
The complainant is directed to take possession by paying the appropriate amount. The file be consigned to record. The order be uploaded on the portal. Date: 29 /40,/ 2020 (Balvinder Kumar) (Member) Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority15 Jun 2018
Complaint No. 120186000
Heard, and the record of the file perused. The applicant seeks amendment of the order under Section 39 of the Act. Section [ao?] of the RERA Act, 2046 provides as follows: 39 The Authority may, at any time within a period of two years the date of the order made under this Act, with a view to rectifying any mistake appa…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority15 Jun 2018
Complaint No. 120186000
This complaint was presented before the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Uttar Pradesh by Mr. Mayank Jain, son of Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain, resident of g-74, Avantika Colony, near Chiranjiv Vihar, Ghaziabad, against the respondent AO G.S. Promoters Pvt. Ltd., Sikka House, C-60, Preet Vihar, Vikas Marg, Delhi-s:0092, in…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority10 Jul 2018
Complaint No. 120185695
During the hearings from time to time in the said 09 cases received on the RERA portal, it was informed by the allottees that flats were booked by them in the "Jal Vayu Towers, Meerut" project being developed by M/s Air Force Naval Housing Board. In that sequence, mentioning the prescribed amount for allotment of flats…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority10 Jul 2018
Complaint No. 120185443
During the hearings from time to time in the said 09 cases received on the RERA portal, it was informed by the allottees that flats were booked by them in the "Jal Vayu Towers, Meerut" project being developed by M/s Air Force Naval Housing Board. In that sequence, mentioning the prescribed amount for allotment of flats…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority24 Feb 2018
Complaint No. 120185298
भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, उत्तर प्रदेश नामित प्राधिकारी / उपाध्यक्ष हापुड़-पिलखुवा विकास प्राधिकरण, हापुड़ शिकायत संख्या:-420485298 श्री आदित्य जैन बनाम Ao लॉजिक्स इन्फाडेवलपर्स प्राएलि0 यह शिकायत श्री आदित्य जैन पुत्र डा0 अतुल जैन निवासी-47, लेखराम रोड, दरियागंज, दिल्ली द्वारा विपक्षी मै? लॉजिक्स इन्फाडेवलपर्स प्र…
Supreme Court of India2018
(2018) 10 SCC 443
Restored police powers under Section 498A while directing strict compliance with Arnesh Kumar safeguards to balance protection of married women with prevention of abuse. | Cruelty provisions and safeguards against misuse applied to Section 85 BNS (corresponding to Section 498A IPC).
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2018Full text
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 962
WITH B C. A. No. 3345 of 2018. Naman Nagrath, Rajeev Dhawan, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Parag P. Tripathi, Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sanjay R. Hegde, Sr. Advs., Purushaindra Kaurav, A.G., Harsh Parashar, Zubin Prasad, Aman Pandey, Prateek Khandelwal, Shadan Farasat, Arjun Garg, Prashant C Kumar, Saurabh Suman Sinha, Aditya De…
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2018Full text
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 683
H 683 684 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 6 S.C.R. A Naman Nagrath, Rajeev Dhawan, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Parag P. Tripathi, Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sanjay R. Hegde, Sr. Advs., Purushaindra Kaurav, AG, Harsh Parashar, Zubin Prasad, Aman Pandey, Prateek Khandelwal, Shadan Farasat, Arjun Garg, Prashant Kumar, Saurabh Suman S…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
(2020) 13 SCC 337
Triple test for bail applied to Section 483 BNSS (special powers of High Court/Sessions Court).
Supreme Court of India2019
(2019) 4 SCC 163
Scope of interference under Section 37 is narrower than Section 34; appellate court cannot travel beyond grounds in Section 34 or reassess evidence.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2020) 8 SCC 531
Commercial wisdom of Committee of Creditors (CoC) is supreme; adjudicating authority cannot interfere with commercial decisions; operational creditors need not be paid equally to financial creditors.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2019) 4 SCC 197
Presumption under Section 139 applies even if blank cheque leaf was voluntarily signed and handed over by drawer; drawer liable unless debt disproved.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2019) 5 SCC 418
Principles governing rebuttal of presumption under Section 139; accused can rebut by relying on prosecution evidence or probabilities without stepping into witness box.
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority10 Apr 2018
Complaint No. 920171565
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, 06 जगदीश चन्द्र बोस मार्ग, लालबाग, लखनऊ। शिकायत संख्या-920474565 दिनांक 06 अप्रैल 2048 श्री शिव शंकर चौधरी, मेसर्स गार्डनिया एम्स डेवलपर्स प्रा0लि0, बी0-8, फ्लैट नं0-202, बनाम टावर नं0-34, फ्लैट नं0-604, गार्डनिया एम्स ग्लोरी, कामन deer गेम्स विलेज, सेक्टर-46, नोएडा। नई दिल्ली-4400…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority1 Sep 2018
Complaint No. 320188581
भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, उत्त्तर प्रदेश नामित प्राधिकारी / उपाध्यक्ष हापुड़-पिलखुवा विकास प्राधिकरण, हापुड़ प्राधिकारी / उपाध्यक्ष हापुड़-पिलखुवा विकास प्राधिकरण, हापुड़ शिकायत संख्या:- 320488584 श्री पुनीत सिंह बनाम मै0 ला रेसीडेन्सिया डवलपर्स प्राएलि0 निर्णय यह शिकायत श्री पुनीत सिंह पुत्र श्री विजेन्द्र सिंह ते…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority21 Jul 2018
Complaint No. 320187681
भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, उत्तर प्रदेश नामित प्राधिकारी / उपाध्यक्ष हापुड़-पिलखुवा विकास प्राधिकरण, हापुड़ प्राधिकारी / उपाध्यक्ष हापुड़- विकास प्राधिकरण, हापुड़ शिकायत संख्या:- 3208768॥ श्रीमती धनेश्वरी देवी cart बनाम मै0 रेडिकॉन इन्फास्ट्रक्चर एण्ड हाउसिंग प्राएलि0 निर्णय यह शिकायत श्रीमती धनेश्वरी देवी ध्यानी पत…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority27 Aug 2018
Complaint No. 220187419
मेरठ विकास प्राधिकरण, मेरठ | उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण शिकायत संख्या:--220487449 दिनांक : 23 अगस्त, 2048 शिकायतकर्ता: विकासकर्ता: श्री यतीश अग्रवाल, मै0 पुष्पांजलि कन्स0 प्रा0 लि0, निवासी-फ्लैट-42042,एटीएस एडवान्टेज, 46-ए, प्रभुनगर, जयपुर हाउस, अहिंसा खण्ड, गाजियाबाद | आगरा--282040 | आदेश दी रियल wee (रैगुलेश…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority3 May 2018
Complaint No. 1220174937
शिकायत संख्या- 220:74937 feqia 04 मई 20:8 Mr. Rahul Sharma & Col. A.K. Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd. Sharma 8-55, Nar Vihar-4 34 बनाम Tower No. 34, Flat No. 604, Noida Dadri Noida Common Wealth Games Village New Delhi- 0092 आदेश भू-सम्पदा (विनियमन एवं विकास) अधिनियम, 206 की धारा-3 के अन्तर्गत प्रस्तुत शिकायत संख्य…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority15 Jun 2018
Complaint No. 120186000
The complainant is directed to take possession by paying the appropriate amount. The file be consigned to record. The order be uploaded on the portal. Date: 29 /40,/ 2020 (Balvinder Kumar) (Member) Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority15 Jun 2018
Complaint No. 120186000
Heard, and the record of the file perused. The applicant seeks amendment of the order under Section 39 of the Act. Section [ao?] of the RERA Act, 2046 provides as follows: 39 The Authority may, at any time within a period of two years the date of the order made under this Act, with a view to rectifying any mistake appa…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority15 Jun 2018
Complaint No. 120186000
This complaint was presented before the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Uttar Pradesh by Mr. Mayank Jain, son of Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain, resident of g-74, Avantika Colony, near Chiranjiv Vihar, Ghaziabad, against the respondent AO G.S. Promoters Pvt. Ltd., Sikka House, C-60, Preet Vihar, Vikas Marg, Delhi-s:0092, in…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority10 Jul 2018
Complaint No. 120185695
During the hearings from time to time in the said 09 cases received on the RERA portal, it was informed by the allottees that flats were booked by them in the "Jal Vayu Towers, Meerut" project being developed by M/s Air Force Naval Housing Board. In that sequence, mentioning the prescribed amount for allotment of flats…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority10 Jul 2018
Complaint No. 120185443
During the hearings from time to time in the said 09 cases received on the RERA portal, it was informed by the allottees that flats were booked by them in the "Jal Vayu Towers, Meerut" project being developed by M/s Air Force Naval Housing Board. In that sequence, mentioning the prescribed amount for allotment of flats…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority24 Feb 2018
Complaint No. 120185298
भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, उत्तर प्रदेश नामित प्राधिकारी / उपाध्यक्ष हापुड़-पिलखुवा विकास प्राधिकरण, हापुड़ शिकायत संख्या:-420485298 श्री आदित्य जैन बनाम Ao लॉजिक्स इन्फाडेवलपर्स प्राएलि0 यह शिकायत श्री आदित्य जैन पुत्र डा0 अतुल जैन निवासी-47, लेखराम रोड, दरियागंज, दिल्ली द्वारा विपक्षी मै? लॉजिक्स इन्फाडेवलपर्स प्र…
Supreme Court of India2018
(2018) 10 SCC 443
Restored police powers under Section 498A while directing strict compliance with Arnesh Kumar safeguards to balance protection of married women with prevention of abuse. | Cruelty provisions and safeguards against misuse applied to Section 85 BNS (corresponding to Section 498A IPC).
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2018Full text
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 962
WITH B C. A. No. 3345 of 2018. Naman Nagrath, Rajeev Dhawan, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Parag P. Tripathi, Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sanjay R. Hegde, Sr. Advs., Purushaindra Kaurav, A.G., Harsh Parashar, Zubin Prasad, Aman Pandey, Prateek Khandelwal, Shadan Farasat, Arjun Garg, Prashant C Kumar, Saurabh Suman Sinha, Aditya De…
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2018Full text
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 683
H 683 684 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 6 S.C.R. A Naman Nagrath, Rajeev Dhawan, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Parag P. Tripathi, Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sanjay R. Hegde, Sr. Advs., Purushaindra Kaurav, AG, Harsh Parashar, Zubin Prasad, Aman Pandey, Prateek Khandelwal, Shadan Farasat, Arjun Garg, Prashant Kumar, Saurabh Suman S…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis