Law on Tips(LOTS)India's Premier Legal News

⌘K

Home
The Bar Room
The Gazette
The Library
Legal League
Judgments
Careers

⚖

Loading…

Law on Tips.

A free Indian legal platform. Bringing you the latest judgments, legislative updates, and in-depth legal analysis from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and Tribunals.

Explore

The Bar Room
The Gazette
The Library
Compare Acts
Legal League
Judgments
Careers

Trust & Standards

About Us
Editorial Policy
Fact-Checking
Corrections
Methodology
Ownership
Masthead
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact

Get the latest legal news delivered to your inbox daily.

Bar News Acts League

MMTC Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd. | Judgment | Law on Tips

Judgment Library/Case record

Supreme Court of India

MMTC Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd.

(2019) 4 SCC 163

Decision date: 2019
Text availability: Summary or case record only
Bench: 2-Judge Bench

Source: landmark_precedents seed

Case summary

Scope of interference under Section 37 is narrower than Section 34; appellate court cannot travel beyond grounds in Section 34 or reassess evidence.

Principle

Scope of interference under Section 37 is narrower than Section 34; appellate court cannot travel beyond grounds in Section 34 or reassess evidence.

Connected provisions and cases

interpretsThe Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 · Section 37 Other decisions on this provision →

Related judgments

UHL Power Company Ltd. v. State of Himachal Pradesh · (2022) 4 SCC 116 · 2022 · 1 shared provision

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.

Judgment Library/Case record

Supreme Court of India

MMTC Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd.

(2019) 4 SCC 163

Decision date: 2019
Text availability: Summary or case record only
Bench: 2-Judge Bench

Source: landmark_precedents seed

Case summary

Scope of interference under Section 37 is narrower than Section 34; appellate court cannot travel beyond grounds in Section 34 or reassess evidence.

Principle

Scope of interference under Section 37 is narrower than Section 34; appellate court cannot travel beyond grounds in Section 34 or reassess evidence.

Connected provisions and cases

interpretsThe Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 · Section 37 Other decisions on this provision →

Related judgments

UHL Power Company Ltd. v. State of Himachal Pradesh · (2022) 4 SCC 116 · 2022 · 1 shared provision

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.