10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Surbhi Agarwal v. Logix Infrastructure Pvt.ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/08/0517/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Arpit Agarwal v. Project Category-Un-Register LOGIX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD

Complaint No. NCR144/08/0383/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Narain and Sonal Ramchandani v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/07/96870/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Ashish Narula v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/07/95955/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Abhiraj Singh Rathore v. Logix Infrastructure Pvt.ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/07/0675/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Rajesh Mohan v. Logix Infrastructure Pvt.ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/07/0441/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Mrs Surbhi Anand and Mr Nikhil Agarwal v. Logix Infrastructure Pvt.ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/1212/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Prashant Jagwani v. Logix Infrastructure Pvt.ltd

Complaint No. 2201931471 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Date: 40.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. Upon call, complainant absent. Learned counsel Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Heard and the file was perused. In the complaint in question, following hearing as per rules, the Hon'ble Bench-01 p

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Sneh Lata Srivastava v. Oasis Buildmart India Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. 2201931132 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Date: 40.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. Upon call, learned counsel Mr. Jitendra Singh appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. The objectio

8 Jul 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Sumit Narula v. Apex Dream Homes Private Limited

Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/08/132286/2025 · for the complainant

7 Jul 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Tapasya Ohri v. PATEL ADVANCE JV Registered Office

Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/10/133170/2025 · for the respondent

Due to unavailability of the Bench, it is not possible to conduct hearing of the said complaint fixed on date: 07-07-2026. Therefore, in view of the above, the file be put up for hearing on date 23-07-2006. Date: 06-07-2026 fog (Chandrasen Yadav) L.C.R.A. A.O. Bench, Lucknow

6 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Preeti Goel v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/11/102577/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Date: 06.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, learned advocate Ms. Pragati Bhardwaj appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Reply dat

6 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Deepanshu Agarwal and Lokesh Mohan Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/51460/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Date: 06.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, on behalf of the complainant, learned Advocate Mr. Punit Jain appeared. On behalf of the respondent, learned Advocate Mr. Asit Kumar appeared. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. It was stated b

3 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Pooja Bansal v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/05/93964/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Date: 03.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented. On being called, learned advocate Ms. Jyoti appeared for the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for the opposite party. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. In the complaint in que

3 Jul 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Sheela Devi v. Suncity Hi-Tech Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/03/137428/2026 · Bench 1 · for the complainant

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. Upon call, learned counsel Mr. Punit Jain, proxy counsel for learned counsel Mr. Manendra Kumar, appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Mr. Kanik appeared on behalf of the respondent. The learned counsel for the complainan

3 Jul 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Sourabh Verma v. Royce Promoters & Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR145/02/136819/2026 · Bench 1 · for the complainant

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. Upon call, learned counsel Mr. Punit Jain, proxy counsel for learned counsel Mr. Manendra Kumar, appeared on behalf of the complainant. C.S. Mr. Vijay Gupta appeared on behalf of the respondent. In the matter, on the previous date / heari

3 Jul 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Pramod Kumar Dash v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/58959/2020 · Bench 1 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The applicant / complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant's proxy, Advocate Shri Anish Kumar Singh, appeared on behalf of the complainant's learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy,

3 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

seema singhal v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/90805/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Date: 03.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented [?]. When called, learned advocate Shri Manas Roy appeared for the complainant, and learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for the opposite party. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. In the complai

3 Jul 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Suresh Kumar Kardar v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/69225/2021 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant was absent. On behalf of the opposite party, Mr. Manendra Kumar's proxy, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain, appeared. The arguments of the learned advocate for the opposite company were heard in detail. Bot

1 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Snehlata Tomar v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/04/74269/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Date: 04.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was taken up. On call, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Mr. Asit appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. In compliance of the

1 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Sudhir Gupta v. Wave Megacity Centre Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/11/0271/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Date: 04.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented. On call, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Mr. Asit appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. The reply has been

1 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Manoj Kumar Tomar and Mamta Tomar v. Sanjeev Kumar C-26, 1ST Floor

Complaint No. NCR144/08/80546/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

1 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Veena Dhingra and Aakash Dhingra v. Mahaluxmi Infrahome Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/07/96863/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Date: 04.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, on behalf of the complainant, learned Advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared. The respondent was absent. Heard and the file was perused. Reply dated 22.062026 has been filed by the respondent, against which time w

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Surbhi Agarwal v. Logix Infrastructure Pvt.ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/08/0517/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Arpit Agarwal v. Project Category-Un-Register LOGIX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD

Complaint No. NCR144/08/0383/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Narain and Sonal Ramchandani v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/07/96870/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Ashish Narula v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/07/95955/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Abhiraj Singh Rathore v. Logix Infrastructure Pvt.ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/07/0675/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Rajesh Mohan v. Logix Infrastructure Pvt.ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/07/0441/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Mrs Surbhi Anand and Mr Nikhil Agarwal v. Logix Infrastructure Pvt.ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/1212/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Prashant Jagwani v. Logix Infrastructure Pvt.ltd

Complaint No. 2201931471 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Date: 40.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. Upon call, complainant absent. Learned counsel Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Heard and the file was perused. In the complaint in question, following hearing as per rules, the Hon'ble Bench-01 p

10 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Sneh Lata Srivastava v. Oasis Buildmart India Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. 2201931132 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Date: 40.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. Upon call, learned counsel Mr. Jitendra Singh appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. The objectio

8 Jul 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Sumit Narula v. Apex Dream Homes Private Limited

Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/08/132286/2025 · for the complainant

7 Jul 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Tapasya Ohri v. PATEL ADVANCE JV Registered Office

Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/10/133170/2025 · for the respondent

Due to unavailability of the Bench, it is not possible to conduct hearing of the said complaint fixed on date: 07-07-2026. Therefore, in view of the above, the file be put up for hearing on date 23-07-2006. Date: 06-07-2026 fog (Chandrasen Yadav) L.C.R.A. A.O. Bench, Lucknow

6 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Preeti Goel v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/11/102577/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Date: 06.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, learned advocate Ms. Pragati Bhardwaj appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Reply dat

6 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Deepanshu Agarwal and Lokesh Mohan Agarwal v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/03/51460/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Date: 06.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, on behalf of the complainant, learned Advocate Mr. Punit Jain appeared. On behalf of the respondent, learned Advocate Mr. Asit Kumar appeared. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. It was stated b

3 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Pooja Bansal v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/05/93964/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Date: 03.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented. On being called, learned advocate Ms. Jyoti appeared for the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for the opposite party. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. In the complaint in que

3 Jul 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Sheela Devi v. Suncity Hi-Tech Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/03/137428/2026 · Bench 1 · for the complainant

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. Upon call, learned counsel Mr. Punit Jain, proxy counsel for learned counsel Mr. Manendra Kumar, appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Mr. Kanik appeared on behalf of the respondent. The learned counsel for the complainan

3 Jul 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Sourabh Verma v. Royce Promoters & Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR145/02/136819/2026 · Bench 1 · for the complainant

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. Upon call, learned counsel Mr. Punit Jain, proxy counsel for learned counsel Mr. Manendra Kumar, appeared on behalf of the complainant. C.S. Mr. Vijay Gupta appeared on behalf of the respondent. In the matter, on the previous date / heari

3 Jul 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Pramod Kumar Dash v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/58959/2020 · Bench 1 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The applicant / complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant's proxy, Advocate Shri Anish Kumar Singh, appeared on behalf of the complainant's learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy,

3 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

seema singhal v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/90805/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Date: 03.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented [?]. When called, learned advocate Shri Manas Roy appeared for the complainant, and learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for the opposite party. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. In the complai

3 Jul 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Suresh Kumar Kardar v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/69225/2021 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant was absent. On behalf of the opposite party, Mr. Manendra Kumar's proxy, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain, appeared. The arguments of the learned advocate for the opposite company were heard in detail. Bot

1 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Snehlata Tomar v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/04/74269/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Date: 04.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was taken up. On call, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Mr. Asit appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. In compliance of the

1 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Sudhir Gupta v. Wave Megacity Centre Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/11/0271/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Date: 04.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented. On call, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Mr. Asit appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. The reply has been

1 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Manoj Kumar Tomar and Mamta Tomar v. Sanjeev Kumar C-26, 1ST Floor

Complaint No. NCR144/08/80546/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

1 Jul 2026·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Veena Dhingra and Aakash Dhingra v. Mahaluxmi Infrahome Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/07/96863/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant

Date: 04.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, on behalf of the complainant, learned Advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared. The respondent was absent. Heard and the file was perused. Reply dated 22.062026 has been filed by the respondent, against which time w