Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Samir Saxena v. ATS Realty Private Limited
Complaint No. NCR144/11/50882/2020 · for the respondent
Loading…
Loading…
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 476–500 of 3,086 · Page 20 of 124
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/50882/2020 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 476–500 of 3,086 · Page 20 of 124
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/50882/2020 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/1281/2019 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/1259/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
The complainant shall be free to file a case on the RERA portal to get back the deposited amount with interest. It is clear that the respondent has violated the order. Therefore, this file is to be placed before the Authority for action under Section 63. For further action, the file be sent to the Enforcement Cell. Dat
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/114694/2023 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/102905/2022 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/0271/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
The opposite party is directed to complete the complainant's unit and give possession within 4 months, and to pay the complainant interest for the delay as per the order. The complainant shall take possession of its unit as stated above. Both parties shall ensure compliance as stated above. The order shall be uploaded
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/95716/2022 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/63888/2020 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/63888/2020 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/63562/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No. +- NCR44/I0/63562/2020 Naveen Goyal vs. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. In the present matter, the order was reserved on 46.02.2022, and the opposite party was directed to make its written arguments available by 28.02.2022. In compliance, the complainant filed
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/62560/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124062/2024 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124062/2024 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124060/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124051/2024 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124051/2024 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/114482/2023 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/101548/2022 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0739/2019 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0730/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No. — NCRI44/40/0730/20I9 Omkar Nath Tandon versus [?] Promoters and Developers [?] In the case in question, on 23.03.2022, while reserving the file for orders, both parties were directed to file their written arguments by 05.04.2022. The opposite party, in filing its reply
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0704/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar. Bench 2 Present: Shri [?], Member Complaint No.: 8 Serial No. / Complainant | Unit No. | Amount Rs./- I. | NCR44/0/0703/20 9, V Kunal Arora | FE/FS-24 | 5,38,94/- [?]44/0/0704/209 | Kunal [?] | [?]/[?]8-44 | 5,38,94/- versus K.T.N.[?] Infra Ind
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0704/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
"The Appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law. (]) Whether the Appellate Court has erred in Law and misinterpreted the provision of Section 43 (5) of the REAL ESTATE (REGULATION & DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 206 in the light of the order dated 28.02.2020 passed by the learned RERA Authority? (2) Whether si
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0704/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Present: Smt. Kalpana Mishra, Member Complaint [?] NCR44/0/0704/20i9 Kunal Arora versus K.2.N. Infra India [?] This file has been presented for proceedings under Section 63 of the Act and other relevant provisions, for violation of an order passed earlier. In the complainant's complaint, the Bench had passed the follow
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0703/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Present: Smt. Kalpana Mishra, Member Complaint [?] NCR44/0/0703/209 Kunal Arora versus K.2.N. [?] India Pvt. Ltd. This file has been presented for proceedings under Section 63 of the Act and other relevant provisions, for violation of an order passed earlier. In the complainant's complaint, the Bench had passed the fol
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0703/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar. Bench 2 Present: Shri [?], Member Complaint No.: 8 Serial No. / Complainant | Unit No. | Amount Rs./- I. | NCR44/0/0703/20 9, V Kunal Arora | FE/FS-24 | 5,38,94/- [?]44/0/0704/209 | Kunal [?] | [?]/[?]8-44 | 5,38,94/- versus K.T.N.[?] Infra Ind
Complaint No. NCR144/11/1281/2019 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/1259/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
The complainant shall be free to file a case on the RERA portal to get back the deposited amount with interest. It is clear that the respondent has violated the order. Therefore, this file is to be placed before the Authority for action under Section 63. For further action, the file be sent to the Enforcement Cell. Dat
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/114694/2023 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/102905/2022 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/0271/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
The opposite party is directed to complete the complainant's unit and give possession within 4 months, and to pay the complainant interest for the delay as per the order. The complainant shall take possession of its unit as stated above. Both parties shall ensure compliance as stated above. The order shall be uploaded
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/95716/2022 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/63888/2020 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/63888/2020 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/63562/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No. +- NCR44/I0/63562/2020 Naveen Goyal vs. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. In the present matter, the order was reserved on 46.02.2022, and the opposite party was directed to make its written arguments available by 28.02.2022. In compliance, the complainant filed
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/62560/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124062/2024 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124062/2024 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124060/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124051/2024 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124051/2024 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/114482/2023 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/101548/2022 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0739/2019 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0730/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No. — NCRI44/40/0730/20I9 Omkar Nath Tandon versus [?] Promoters and Developers [?] In the case in question, on 23.03.2022, while reserving the file for orders, both parties were directed to file their written arguments by 05.04.2022. The opposite party, in filing its reply
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0704/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar. Bench 2 Present: Shri [?], Member Complaint No.: 8 Serial No. / Complainant | Unit No. | Amount Rs./- I. | NCR44/0/0703/20 9, V Kunal Arora | FE/FS-24 | 5,38,94/- [?]44/0/0704/209 | Kunal [?] | [?]/[?]8-44 | 5,38,94/- versus K.T.N.[?] Infra Ind
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0704/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
"The Appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law. (]) Whether the Appellate Court has erred in Law and misinterpreted the provision of Section 43 (5) of the REAL ESTATE (REGULATION & DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 206 in the light of the order dated 28.02.2020 passed by the learned RERA Authority? (2) Whether si
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0704/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Present: Smt. Kalpana Mishra, Member Complaint [?] NCR44/0/0704/20i9 Kunal Arora versus K.2.N. Infra India [?] This file has been presented for proceedings under Section 63 of the Act and other relevant provisions, for violation of an order passed earlier. In the complainant's complaint, the Bench had passed the follow
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0703/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Present: Smt. Kalpana Mishra, Member Complaint [?] NCR44/0/0703/209 Kunal Arora versus K.2.N. [?] India Pvt. Ltd. This file has been presented for proceedings under Section 63 of the Act and other relevant provisions, for violation of an order passed earlier. In the complainant's complaint, the Bench had passed the fol
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0703/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar. Bench 2 Present: Shri [?], Member Complaint No.: 8 Serial No. / Complainant | Unit No. | Amount Rs./- I. | NCR44/0/0703/20 9, V Kunal Arora | FE/FS-24 | 5,38,94/- [?]44/0/0704/209 | Kunal [?] | [?]/[?]8-44 | 5,38,94/- versus K.T.N.[?] Infra Ind