Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority
Kunal Arora v. K2N Infra India Private Limited
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0704/2019
Verified by Puneet Jain, Editor
- Decision date
- Not recorded
- Text availability
- Machine-read (OCR) text, unverified
- Bench
- Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar
- Counsel
- Puneet Jain (in this matter)
Source: UP RERA order
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
English translation. Machine translation from the Hindi by AI (Claude Haiku), not reviewed. The original order below is the authoritative text.
U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar. Bench II Proceedings under Sections 38 / 40 / 63 Complaint No. —NCRI44/0/0704/209 Kunal Arora versus M/s K.T.N.[?] Infra India Pvt. Ltd. Date: 49/40/2023 The complainant's case under Section 63 was presented through video conferencing on 26.06.2023. On being called, the counsel for both parties appeared. The complainant's counsel informed that the opposite party has not yet complied with the order passed by the RERA Bench under Section 34. The opposite party's counsel argued that another case relating to the matter in question has been filed by the opposite party in the Hon'ble High Court at Allahabad, which is still pending, being Second Appeal No. 4 / 202, in which the following orders were passed on 44.04.2024: "The Appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law. (]) Whether the Appellate Court has erred in Law and misinterpreted the provision of Section 43 (5) of the REAL ESTATE (REGULATION & DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 206 in the light of the order dated 28.02.2020 passed by the learned RERA Authority? (2) Whether since the provision of the Section 43 (5) of the REAL ESTATE (REGULATION & DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 20I6 mandates a pre-deposit at least 30% of the penalty, interest or compensation and the Authority has not imposed any penalty, interest or compensation upon the appellant, how can a compliance of pre-deposit can be made by the Appellant ?
(3) Whether the Appellate Tribunal was correct in rejecting the Appeal of the Appellant without hearing the Application for Waiver of Pre-deposit in compliance of Section 43 (5) of the Act, in such matters where there is no penalty or compensation imposed by the RERA Authority?. Issue notice to the opposite party. The appellant shall take steps within one week. The office shall indicate the matter to be listed in the first week of March, 202]." In support of its statement, the opposite party has filed a photocopy of the order dated 44.04.2024 passed by the [?] High Court, Allahabad, and has requested that the file be kept in abeyance until the final decision of the Hon'ble High Court at Allahabad. From perusal of the file it is known that the appeal filed by the opposite party in the Hon'ble High Court at Allahabad is presently under consideration. In such a situation, the request of the opposite party is accepted, and the file is kept in abeyance until the final decision of the Hon'ble High Court at Allahabad. The order shall be uploaded on the portal. The file be consigned to records. [?] (Member) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority
उ0प्र0 भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | पीठ-॥ कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-38 /40 / 63 शिकायत संख्या -—NCRI44/0/0704/209 कुनाल अरोड़ा बनाम मैसर्स के.टूएन. इंफ्रा इंडिया प्रा० लि० दिनांक :- 49/40/2023 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-63 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से दिनांक 26.06.2023 को प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर उभयपक्ष के अधिवक्तागण उपस्थित हुए। शिकायतकर्ता के अधिवक्ता द्वारा अवगत कराया गया कि रेरा की पीठ द्वारा धारा-34 के अन्तर्गत पारित आदेश का विपक्षी द्वारा अभी तक अनुपालन नहीं किया गया है। विपक्षी के अधिवक्ता द्वारा तर्क प्रस्तुत किया गया कि उनके द्वारा प्रश्नगत प्रकरण से सम्बन्धित एक अन्य वाद माननीय उच्च न्यायालय, इलाहाबाद में योजित किया गया है, जोकि अभी विचाराधीन है, जिसकी द्वितीय अपील संख्या-4 / 202 है, जिसमें दिनांक 44.04.2024 को निम्नवत् आदेश पारित किये गये हैं :- The Appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law. (]) Whether the Appellate Court has erred in Law and misinterpreted the provision of Section 43 (5) of the REAL ESTATE (REGULATION & DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 206 in the light of the order dated 28.02.2020 passed by the learned RERA Authority? (2) Whether since the provision of the Section 43 (5) of the REAL ESTATE (REGULATION & DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 20I6 mandates a pre-deposit at least 30% of the penalty, interest or compensation and the Authority has not imposed any penalty, interest or compensation upon the appellant, how can a compliance of pre-deposit can be made by the Appellant ? Page 3
(3) Whether the Appellate Tribunal was correct in rejecting the Appeal of the Appellant without hearing the Application for Waiver of Pre-deposit in compliance of Section 43 (5) of the Act, in such matters where there is no penalty or compensation imposed by the RERA Authority?. Issue notice to the opposite party. The appellant shall take steps within one week. The office shall indicate the matter to be listed in the first week of March, 202]." विपक्षी द्वारा अपने कथन के समर्थन में Fo उच्च न्यायालय, इलाहाबाद द्वारा पारित आदेश दिनांक 44.04.2024 की छायाप्रति दाखिल की गयी है और विपक्षी द्वारा अनुरोध किया गया है कि माननीय उच्च न्यायालय, इलाहाबाद के अंतिम निर्णय तक पत्रावली को abeyance में रखा जाए। पत्रावली के अवलोकन से विदित है कि विपक्षी द्वारा माननीय उच्च न्यायालय, इलाहाबाद में योजित अपील वर्तमान समय में विचाराधीन है, ऐसी स्थिति में विपक्षी का अनुरोध स्वीकार किया जाता है और माननीय उच्च न्यायालय, इलाहाबाद के अंतिम निर्णय तक पत्रावली को abeyance में रखा जाता है। आदेश पोर्टल पर अपलोड किया जाए। पत्रावली दाखिल दफ्तर हो | Cat ॥ los 0 (सदस्य) sono भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण Page 4