Loading…
Loading…
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 501–525 of 3,086 · Page 21 of 124
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0703/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
"The Appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law. (l) Whether the Appellate Court has erred in Law and misinterpreted the provision of Section 43 (5) of the REAL ESTATE (REGULATION & DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 206 in the light of the order dated 28.02.2020 passed by the learned RERA Authority? (2) Whether si
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 501–525 of 3,086 · Page 21 of 124
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0703/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
"The Appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law. (l) Whether the Appellate Court has erred in Law and misinterpreted the provision of Section 43 (5) of the REAL ESTATE (REGULATION & DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 206 in the light of the order dated 28.02.2020 passed by the learned RERA Authority? (2) Whether si
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0175/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint PEMT—NCRI44/20/075/209 Sanjeev Mangotra versus Logix Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. In the case in question, on 06.0.2024 the file was reserved for orders, and both parties had been directed to file their respective written arguments by 43.40.2020. However, neither party has file
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/82761/2021 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/82759/2021 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81574/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Heard both parties and perused the record. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the following points for determination were framed: 1. Whether construction work of the opposite party's project was affected due to force majeure events, i.e., various reasons? If so, its effect? 2. Whether the complainant is enti
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81574/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint PST—NCR44/09/8574/2024 [?] Saxena vs. ATS Realty Pvt. Ltd. In this case the file was reserved for order on 34.08.2022. Both parties were directed to file their respective written arguments by 20.09.2022, but neither party has filed any written arguments. The opposite party
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81571/2021 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81570/2021 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81569/2021 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81568/2021 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81566/2021 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81564/2021 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81561/2021 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81402/2021 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No. NCR44/09/8 402/202I Navneet Kumar vs. La Residencia Developers [?] In the case in question, the file was reserved for orders on 25.04.2022. Thereafter, on checking the RERA portal, it has come to the notice of the Bench that the proceedings relating to the project in qu
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/61295/2020 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/61295/2020 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/59745/2020 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/59745/2020 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/98732/2022 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/98172/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/98170/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/98170/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/98137/2022 · Bench 3 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/98137/2022 · Bench 3 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/79308/2021 · for the respondent
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0175/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint PEMT—NCRI44/20/075/209 Sanjeev Mangotra versus Logix Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. In the case in question, on 06.0.2024 the file was reserved for orders, and both parties had been directed to file their respective written arguments by 43.40.2020. However, neither party has file
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/82761/2021 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/82759/2021 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81574/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Heard both parties and perused the record. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the following points for determination were framed: 1. Whether construction work of the opposite party's project was affected due to force majeure events, i.e., various reasons? If so, its effect? 2. Whether the complainant is enti
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81574/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint PST—NCR44/09/8574/2024 [?] Saxena vs. ATS Realty Pvt. Ltd. In this case the file was reserved for order on 34.08.2022. Both parties were directed to file their respective written arguments by 20.09.2022, but neither party has filed any written arguments. The opposite party
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81571/2021 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81570/2021 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81569/2021 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81568/2021 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81566/2021 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81564/2021 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81561/2021 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81402/2021 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
Shri Rajeev Kumar, Hon'ble Chairman Complaint No. NCR44/09/8 402/202I Navneet Kumar vs. La Residencia Developers [?] In the case in question, the file was reserved for orders on 25.04.2022. Thereafter, on checking the RERA portal, it has come to the notice of the Bench that the proceedings relating to the project in qu
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/61295/2020 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/61295/2020 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/59745/2020 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/59745/2020 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/98732/2022 · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/98172/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/98170/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/98170/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/98137/2022 · Bench 3 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/98137/2022 · Bench 3 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Undated
UndatedFinal orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/79308/2021 · for the respondent