8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Shrawan kumar v. Patel Advance Jv Neotown Phase-1
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133714/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
Loading…
Loading…
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,326–1,350 of 3,086 · Page 54 of 124
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133714/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,326–1,350 of 3,086 · Page 54 of 124
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133714/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133714/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133487/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133487/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133485/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133485/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133291/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133291/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/132137/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/132137/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. LKO118/02/126858/2025 · for the complainant
7 Jan 2026
7 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/132098/2025 · Bench 2 · for the complainant
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. Upon call, learned counsel Mr. Punit Jain, proxy counsel for learned counsel Mr. Manendra Kumar, appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Ms. Saheli Chakraborty, proxy counsel for learned counsel Mr. C.K. Jha, appeared on be
7 Jan 2026
7 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/131268/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
2 Jan 2026
2 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133400/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
2 Jan 2026
2 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81402/2021 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant was absent. For the opposite party, the proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for Advocate Shri Manendra Kumar. Notice is to be issued for the complainant's appearance. The learned advocate of the opposite c
2 Jan 2026
2 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/110671/2023 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Shiv Tyagi appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for Shri Manendra Kumar. On behalf of the complainant, learned advocate requested
2 Jan 2026
2 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/116952/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When the matter was called, Shri Dhiresh Pandey, learned advocate, appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri Punit Jain, proxy advocate for Shri Manendra Kumar, appeared. The complainant's learned advocate has requested 0
1 Jan 2026
1 Jan 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/04/74269/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
Date: 04.04.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was taken up. On call, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the complainant. Respondent absent. Heard and the file was perused. An adjournment application has been filed by the respondent. The revised calculatio
1 Jan 2026
1 Jan 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/12/0157/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
1 Jan 2026
1 Jan 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0730/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
Date: 04.04.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented. On call, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the complainant. Respondent absent. Heard and the file was perused. An adjournment application has been filed by the respondent. It was stated by the
1 Jan 2026
1 Jan 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/67504/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
1 Jan 2026
1 Jan 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/108543/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
1 Jan 2026
1 Jan 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/105430/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 04.04.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented. On call, learned counsel Mr. Utkarsh Shubham appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. The compla
31 Dec 2025
31 Dec 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/101997/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
31 Dec 2025
31 Dec 2025Application orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/90805/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Presiding Officer: Shri Sanjay R. Bhusareddy, Chairman Complaint No.: Sect-39/l/NCR44/03/90805/2022 La Residencia Developers Pvt. Ltd. Versus Seema Singhal The case was heard through video conferencing on [?] 44--0-2025. When called, on behalf of the applicant/builder, the proxy advocate of learned advocate Shri [?] Ku
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133714/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133487/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133487/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133485/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133485/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133291/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133291/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/132137/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/132137/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. LKO118/02/126858/2025 · for the complainant
7 Jan 2026
7 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/132098/2025 · Bench 2 · for the complainant
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. Upon call, learned counsel Mr. Punit Jain, proxy counsel for learned counsel Mr. Manendra Kumar, appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Ms. Saheli Chakraborty, proxy counsel for learned counsel Mr. C.K. Jha, appeared on be
7 Jan 2026
7 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/131268/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
2 Jan 2026
2 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133400/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
2 Jan 2026
2 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81402/2021 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant was absent. For the opposite party, the proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for Advocate Shri Manendra Kumar. Notice is to be issued for the complainant's appearance. The learned advocate of the opposite c
2 Jan 2026
2 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/110671/2023 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Shiv Tyagi appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for Shri Manendra Kumar. On behalf of the complainant, learned advocate requested
2 Jan 2026
2 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/116952/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When the matter was called, Shri Dhiresh Pandey, learned advocate, appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri Punit Jain, proxy advocate for Shri Manendra Kumar, appeared. The complainant's learned advocate has requested 0
1 Jan 2026
1 Jan 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/04/74269/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
Date: 04.04.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was taken up. On call, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the complainant. Respondent absent. Heard and the file was perused. An adjournment application has been filed by the respondent. The revised calculatio
1 Jan 2026
1 Jan 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/12/0157/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
1 Jan 2026
1 Jan 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/0730/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
Date: 04.04.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented. On call, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the complainant. Respondent absent. Heard and the file was perused. An adjournment application has been filed by the respondent. It was stated by the
1 Jan 2026
1 Jan 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/67504/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
1 Jan 2026
1 Jan 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/108543/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
1 Jan 2026
1 Jan 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/105430/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 04.04.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented. On call, learned counsel Mr. Utkarsh Shubham appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. The compla
31 Dec 2025
31 Dec 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/101997/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
31 Dec 2025
31 Dec 2025Application orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/90805/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Presiding Officer: Shri Sanjay R. Bhusareddy, Chairman Complaint No.: Sect-39/l/NCR44/03/90805/2022 La Residencia Developers Pvt. Ltd. Versus Seema Singhal The case was heard through video conferencing on [?] 44--0-2025. When called, on behalf of the applicant/builder, the proxy advocate of learned advocate Shri [?] Ku