Loading…
Loading…
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,276–1,300 of 3,086 · Page 52 of 124
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122646/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppeared
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,276–1,300 of 3,086 · Page 52 of 124
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122646/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppeared
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122633/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar. The learned advocate for the oppos
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122631/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the opposite com
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122621/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the opposite com
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122511/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The opposite company's learned advocate requested 02 weeks' time to upload a prop
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122276/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The opposite company's learned advocate requested 02 weeks' time
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/121945/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite company requested 02 weeks' time to upl
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121917/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite company, on behalf of the oppo
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121890/2024 · for the respondent
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121818/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite company submitted that a corre
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121616/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite com
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121605/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. In this matter, according to the stateme
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121603/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. In this matter, according to the stateme
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121600/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. In this matter, according to the stateme
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121593/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. As stated by the learned advocates of both sid
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121586/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. As stated by the learned advocates of both sid
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121580/2024 · for the respondent
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121579/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for Shri Manendra Kumar. As stated by the learned advocates of both si
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/51466/2020 · Bench 1 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
20 Jan 2026
20 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/12/102537/2022 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
20 Jan 2026
20 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/11/102426/2022 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
20 Jan 2026
20 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. LKO118/02/126858/2025 · for the complainant
20 Jan 2026
20 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/06/109627/2023 · for the respondent
19 Jan 2026
19 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/12/134727/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
19 Jan 2026
19 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/123138/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122633/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar. The learned advocate for the oppos
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122631/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the opposite com
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122621/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the opposite com
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122511/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The opposite company's learned advocate requested 02 weeks' time to upload a prop
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122276/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The opposite company's learned advocate requested 02 weeks' time
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/121945/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite company requested 02 weeks' time to upl
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121917/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite company, on behalf of the oppo
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121890/2024 · for the respondent
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121818/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite company submitted that a corre
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121616/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite com
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121605/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. In this matter, according to the stateme
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121603/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. In this matter, according to the stateme
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121600/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. In this matter, according to the stateme
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121593/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. As stated by the learned advocates of both sid
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121586/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. As stated by the learned advocates of both sid
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121580/2024 · for the respondent
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121579/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for Shri Manendra Kumar. As stated by the learned advocates of both si
23 Jan 2026
23 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/51466/2020 · Bench 1 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
20 Jan 2026
20 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/12/102537/2022 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
20 Jan 2026
20 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/11/102426/2022 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
20 Jan 2026
20 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. LKO118/02/126858/2025 · for the complainant
20 Jan 2026
20 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/06/109627/2023 · for the respondent
19 Jan 2026
19 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/12/134727/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
19 Jan 2026
19 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/123138/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent