Loading…
Loading…
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,301–1,325 of 3,086 · Page 53 of 124
19 Jan 2026
19 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/122850/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
Dr. Deepak Swarup Saxena (Member) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority
19 Jan 2026
19 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,301–1,325 of 3,086 · Page 53 of 124
19 Jan 2026
19 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/122850/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
Dr. Deepak Swarup Saxena (Member) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority
19 Jan 2026
19 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/119663/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
19 Jan 2026
19 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/117514/2024 · for the respondent
16 Jan 2026
16 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/04/92781/2022 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
16 Jan 2026
16 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/101438/2022 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant's learned advocate Shri Tushar Jeet Singh appeared. For the opposite party, the proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for Advocate Shri Manendra Kumar. The complainant's learned advocate has requested 02 wee
16 Jan 2026
16 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/79910/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
The [?] complaint of the applicant / complainant was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the applicant / complainant's learned Advocate Shri Arnav Yadav appeared. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The arguments of the le
16 Jan 2026
16 Jan 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/06/96120/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
15 Jan 2026
15 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. LKO118/02/126858/2025 · for the complainant
14 Jan 2026
14 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/11/134260/2025 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
14 Jan 2026
14 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/129258/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
14 Jan 2026
14 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/96578/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
The complaint of the applicant / complainant was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain, proxy advocate for learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar, appeared on behalf of the applicant / complainant. Learned advocate Ms. Ashu Chaudhary appeared on behalf of the respond
14 Jan 2026
14 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/04/128483/2025 · Bench 1 · for the complainant
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, proxy counsel Mr. Punit Jain for learned counsel Mr. We Kumar appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Mr. Amit Kumar appeared on behalf of the respondent. A request has been made by the learned counsel for the resp
14 Jan 2026
14 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/04/107329/2023 · Bench 1 · for the complainant
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, proxy counsel Mr. Punit Jain for learned counsel Mr. Ae Kumar appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Mr. Amit Kumar appeared on behalf of the respondent. A request has been made by the learned counsel for the resp
9 Jan 2026
9 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/134277/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, Ms. Sarika Gupta, learned advocate for the complainant, appeared. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Punit Jain appeared on behalf of the learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate for the complainant has
9 Jan 2026
9 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/94729/2022 · for the respondent
9 Jan 2026
9 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/106090/2023 · for the complainant
9 Jan 2026
9 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/10/133170/2025 · for the respondent
Due to unavailability of the Bench, it has not been possible to conduct hearing of the said complaint fixed under Section-34 on date: 09--.04-2026. Therefore, in view of the above, the file be put up for hearing on date 28-04-2026. Date: 09—-04—2026 Adjudicating Officer
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Kushvats appeared for the complainant. For the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The respondent's learned advocate has requested time to
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/134008/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, Ms. Avika Arya, learned advocate for the complainant, appeared. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Punit Jain appeared on behalf of the learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate for the complainant has re
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/133935/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/133935/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133762/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Kushvats appeared for the complainant. For the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The respondent's learned advocate has requested time to
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133715/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133715/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
Complaint No. NCR144/05/119663/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
19 Jan 2026
19 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/117514/2024 · for the respondent
16 Jan 2026
16 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/04/92781/2022 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
16 Jan 2026
16 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/101438/2022 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant's learned advocate Shri Tushar Jeet Singh appeared. For the opposite party, the proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for Advocate Shri Manendra Kumar. The complainant's learned advocate has requested 02 wee
16 Jan 2026
16 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/79910/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
The [?] complaint of the applicant / complainant was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the applicant / complainant's learned Advocate Shri Arnav Yadav appeared. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The arguments of the le
16 Jan 2026
16 Jan 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/06/96120/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
15 Jan 2026
15 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. LKO118/02/126858/2025 · for the complainant
14 Jan 2026
14 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/11/134260/2025 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
14 Jan 2026
14 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/129258/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
14 Jan 2026
14 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/96578/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
The complaint of the applicant / complainant was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain, proxy advocate for learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar, appeared on behalf of the applicant / complainant. Learned advocate Ms. Ashu Chaudhary appeared on behalf of the respond
14 Jan 2026
14 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/04/128483/2025 · Bench 1 · for the complainant
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, proxy counsel Mr. Punit Jain for learned counsel Mr. We Kumar appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Mr. Amit Kumar appeared on behalf of the respondent. A request has been made by the learned counsel for the resp
14 Jan 2026
14 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/04/107329/2023 · Bench 1 · for the complainant
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, proxy counsel Mr. Punit Jain for learned counsel Mr. Ae Kumar appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Mr. Amit Kumar appeared on behalf of the respondent. A request has been made by the learned counsel for the resp
9 Jan 2026
9 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/134277/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, Ms. Sarika Gupta, learned advocate for the complainant, appeared. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Punit Jain appeared on behalf of the learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate for the complainant has
9 Jan 2026
9 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/94729/2022 · for the respondent
9 Jan 2026
9 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/106090/2023 · for the complainant
9 Jan 2026
9 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/10/133170/2025 · for the respondent
Due to unavailability of the Bench, it has not been possible to conduct hearing of the said complaint fixed under Section-34 on date: 09--.04-2026. Therefore, in view of the above, the file be put up for hearing on date 28-04-2026. Date: 09—-04—2026 Adjudicating Officer
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Kushvats appeared for the complainant. For the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The respondent's learned advocate has requested time to
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/134008/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, Ms. Avika Arya, learned advocate for the complainant, appeared. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Punit Jain appeared on behalf of the learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate for the complainant has re
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/133935/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/133935/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133762/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Kushvats appeared for the complainant. For the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The respondent's learned advocate has requested time to
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133715/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
8 Jan 2026
8 Jan 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/133715/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent