4 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Mukesh Kumar v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/04/118775/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant appeared in person. On behalf of the opposite party, the proxy advocate of learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar, Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. As stated by both parties, each has uploaded and filed all its d

4 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Ganesh Hire Purchase and Leasing Finance Pvt. Ltd. through Authorised Representative Sanjeev Nasa v. Rudra Buildwell Projects Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/118255/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant

4 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Popular Cap Fin Lease Pvt. Ltd. Now Known as Leelabihari Finance Pvt. Ltd. through Sanjeev Nasa v. Rudra Buildwell Projects Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/118068/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant

Since the file was reserved for judgment, at this stage an application along with an affidavit has been submitted by the respondent, due to which a date is being granted in the file to hear the other party as per law. In such circumstance, the respondent is directed to maintain status quo regarding the unit in question

4 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Satyawan Gupta v. M/s. Jss Buildcon Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/88575/2022 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, the complainant appeared in person. Learned Advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. It was stated by the complainant that the order passed by the Bench under Section-34 has not been complied with by the responde

4 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Anand Singh v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/06/109627/2023 · for the respondent

3 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Baij Nath Saha and Kumud Kumar v. Asgi Properties Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/04/107313/2023 · Bench 2 · for the complainant

The complainants' case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, Mr. Punit Jain, learned counsel for the complainants, appeared. The respondent was absent. The respondent company's learned counsel has uploaded its written reply in respect of the complaint on the Complaint Page of the RERA P

3 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Abhishek Das v. Eco Green Buildtech Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/12/125765/2024 · Bench 2 · for the respondent

2 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Praveen Kumar Vij v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/12/125074/2024 · Bench 2 · for the respondent

2 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Opender Kishan Pandita and Sunita Pandita v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/07/121788/2024 · for the complainant

30 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Rajesh Ranjan v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/07/130889/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant appeared in person. For the opposite party, Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite party requested time to upload and file its objection regarding the complaint

28 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Atul Kumar Singh and Khushboo Rathore v. Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/10/114000/2023 · Bench 3 · for the complainant

Therefore, the RERA System Analyst is directed to ensure recording, on the basis of the application for amendment of amount submitted on behalf of the complainant, the amount Rs. 34,3,644,/- on the complaint page in place of the amount Rs. 28,60,230/- recorded on the RERA portal. The order sheet be presented for the ab

28 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Tapasya Ohri v. PATEL ADVANCE JV Registered Office

Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/10/133170/2025 · for the respondent

The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, complainant absent. Learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. The respondent has filed objections before this court. The complainant, if she so desires, may ensure uploading a rejoinder to the respondent's objectio

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Deepak Goyal and Kirti Goyal v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/11/134338/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Deepak Goyal and Kirti Goyal v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/11/134338/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Mrs. Akansha Singh v. Ats Homes Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/11/134295/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Mrs. Akansha Singh v. Ats Homes Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/11/134295/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Shaleen Agarwal v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/09/123213/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, the proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for Advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate of the opposite company has request

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Vikas Singh v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/122723/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Sanjay Nimkar v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/122715/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Col Joseph George v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/122674/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Col Joseph George v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/122673/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Rohit Soni v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/122663/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Vivek Dhaka v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/122659/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit

4 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Mukesh Kumar v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/04/118775/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant appeared in person. On behalf of the opposite party, the proxy advocate of learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar, Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. As stated by both parties, each has uploaded and filed all its d

4 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Ganesh Hire Purchase and Leasing Finance Pvt. Ltd. through Authorised Representative Sanjeev Nasa v. Rudra Buildwell Projects Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/118255/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant

4 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Popular Cap Fin Lease Pvt. Ltd. Now Known as Leelabihari Finance Pvt. Ltd. through Sanjeev Nasa v. Rudra Buildwell Projects Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/118068/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant

Since the file was reserved for judgment, at this stage an application along with an affidavit has been submitted by the respondent, due to which a date is being granted in the file to hear the other party as per law. In such circumstance, the respondent is directed to maintain status quo regarding the unit in question

4 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Satyawan Gupta v. M/s. Jss Buildcon Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/01/88575/2022 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, the complainant appeared in person. Learned Advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. It was stated by the complainant that the order passed by the Bench under Section-34 has not been complied with by the responde

4 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Anand Singh v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/06/109627/2023 · for the respondent

3 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Baij Nath Saha and Kumud Kumar v. Asgi Properties Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/04/107313/2023 · Bench 2 · for the complainant

The complainants' case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, Mr. Punit Jain, learned counsel for the complainants, appeared. The respondent was absent. The respondent company's learned counsel has uploaded its written reply in respect of the complaint on the Complaint Page of the RERA P

3 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Abhishek Das v. Eco Green Buildtech Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/12/125765/2024 · Bench 2 · for the respondent

2 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Praveen Kumar Vij v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/12/125074/2024 · Bench 2 · for the respondent

2 Feb 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Opender Kishan Pandita and Sunita Pandita v. Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/07/121788/2024 · for the complainant

30 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Rajesh Ranjan v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/07/130889/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant appeared in person. For the opposite party, Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite party requested time to upload and file its objection regarding the complaint

28 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Atul Kumar Singh and Khushboo Rathore v. Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/10/114000/2023 · Bench 3 · for the complainant

Therefore, the RERA System Analyst is directed to ensure recording, on the basis of the application for amendment of amount submitted on behalf of the complainant, the amount Rs. 34,3,644,/- on the complaint page in place of the amount Rs. 28,60,230/- recorded on the RERA portal. The order sheet be presented for the ab

28 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Tapasya Ohri v. PATEL ADVANCE JV Registered Office

Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/10/133170/2025 · for the respondent

The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, complainant absent. Learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. The respondent has filed objections before this court. The complainant, if she so desires, may ensure uploading a rejoinder to the respondent's objectio

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Deepak Goyal and Kirti Goyal v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/11/134338/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Deepak Goyal and Kirti Goyal v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/11/134338/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Mrs. Akansha Singh v. Ats Homes Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/11/134295/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Mrs. Akansha Singh v. Ats Homes Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/11/134295/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Shaleen Agarwal v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/09/123213/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, the proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for Advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate of the opposite company has request

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Vikas Singh v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/122723/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Sanjay Nimkar v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/122715/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Col Joseph George v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/122674/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Col Joseph George v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/122673/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Rohit Soni v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/122663/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit

23 Jan 2026·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Vivek Dhaka v. La Residentia Developers Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/08/122659/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent

The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit