⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1–20 · Page 1 of 500
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 Jul 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102634/2022
Date: 22.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative Shri C.A. Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Reply…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1–20 · Page 1 of 500
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 Jul 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102634/2022
Date: 22.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative Shri C.A. Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Reply…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority21 May 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102634/2022
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Time …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority26 Feb 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102634/2022
Date: 26.02.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, learned advocate Ms. Pragati appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Reply has been …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority5 Feb 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102579/2022
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-2 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-38, 40(2) एवं 63 48-शिकायत संख्या :-- ४टारा45//02579/2022 श्रीमती रमा बनाम राइज प्रोजेक्ट्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक :- 05/02/2026 ह आदेश-पत्र शिकायतकर्ता का वाद वीडियो. कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प्रस्…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 Jul 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102370/2022
Date: 22.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative Shri C.A. Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Reply…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority21 May 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102370/2022
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Time …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority5 Oct 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/12/86925/2021
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 52 - शिकायत संख्या :- Sect-39/I/NCR44/2/86925/202 यशीप प्रियंका गोयल बनाम एटीएस रियल्टी प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक :- 05 /40,/2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-39 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority25 May 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/12/86925/2021
उप्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3, अन्तर्गत धारा 38/40/63 64 - शिकायत संख्या — 'च(]२44/2/86925/202] यशीप प्रियंका गोयल बनाम एटीएस Race प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक :- 25/05/2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-63 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार प…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority11 Mar 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/12/86925/2021
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3, अन्तर्गत धारा 38/40/63 56 - शिकायत संख्या :-+र्टार44॥2/86925/202 यशीप प्रियंका गोयल बनाम एटीएस रियल्टी प्राइवेट लिमिटेड - दिनांक :-44 /03 / 2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-63 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया।…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority12 Sep 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | आदेश पीठ-2 आदेश अन्तर्गत धारा-39 पीठासीन अधिकारी st हरीश त्रिपाठी न्यायनिर्णायक अधिकारी / प्रत्यायोजित अधिकारी शिकायत संख्या- 5०८-३9॥/४८ारा 44/0/033762/2025 निखिल जैन (आवंटी) बनाम राइज प्रोजेक्ट्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड (प्रमोटर) yw (विनियमन एवं विकास) अ…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority30 Jul 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was absent, and learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for the respondent. The respondent's [?] was heard. The file is reserved for orders. Digitally signed by HARISH TRIPATHI, Date: 2026.08.0 4:03:00 +05'…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority26 May 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025
Judgment and Order under Section 34 read with Section 37 Present: Shri T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint No.: NCR44/I0/733762/2025 Nikhil Jain vs. Rise Projects Pvt. Ltd. The present complaint application has been instituted by the complainant against the opposite party seeking possession of the unit and interest for the …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority7 May 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Kush Vats appeared for the complainant. For the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The parties may, if they wish, file their respective written arguments before the Authority within …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority8 Jan 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Kushvats appeared for the complainant. For the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The respondent's learned advocate has requested time to…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority8 Jan 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025
Hon'ble Chairman, U.P. RERA / Presiding Officer Bench-04 It is respectfully brought to notice that on date 24-42-2025 hearing date is fixed in complaints before the Hon'ble Bench-0॥ in RERA Regional Office, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddha Nagar, but on the said date due to unavoidable reasons, it is proposed to adjourn co…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority19 Aug 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/06/109377/2023
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-39 दिनांक: 9-08-2026 शिकायत संख्या: 5००-39//#0८744/06/09377/2023 महालक्ष्मी इन्फ्राहोम प्रा. लि. बनाम मुकेश पाल सिंह यादव व अन्य आदेश प्रार्थी / बिल्डर का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority8 Jul 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/06/109377/2023
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-39 दिनांक: 08-07-2026 शिकायत संख्या: Sect-39/I/NCR44/06/09377/2023 महालक्ष्मी इन्फ्राहोम प्रा. लि. बनाम मुकेश पाल सिंह यादव व अन्य आदेश प्रार्थी / बिल्डर का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवा…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority19 Jun 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/06/109377/2023
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-39 दिनांक: 9-06-2026 शिकायत संख्या: Sect-39/l/NCR44/06/09377/2023 महालक्ष्मी इन्फ्राहोम प्रा. लि. बनाम मुकेश पाल सिंह व अन्य आदेश weft ,/, बिल्डर का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority18 Mar 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/06/109377/2023
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-39 दिनांक: 8-03-2026 शिकायत संख्या: Sect-39//NCR44/06/]09377/2023 महालक्ष्मी इन्फ्राहोम प्रा. लि. बनाम मुकेश पाल सिंह यादव व अन्य प्रार्थी / बिल्डर का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority20 Aug 2026
Complaint No. NCR169/12/135461/2025
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 4 - शिकायत संख्या — NCR69/2/3546/2025 प्रदीप कुमार त्यागी बनाम अंसल लैंडमार्क टाउनशिप्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक :- 20/08 /2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-34 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority21 May 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102634/2022
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Time …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority26 Feb 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102634/2022
Date: 26.02.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, learned advocate Ms. Pragati appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Reply has been …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority5 Feb 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102579/2022
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-2 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-38, 40(2) एवं 63 48-शिकायत संख्या :-- ४टारा45//02579/2022 श्रीमती रमा बनाम राइज प्रोजेक्ट्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक :- 05/02/2026 ह आदेश-पत्र शिकायतकर्ता का वाद वीडियो. कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प्रस्…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 Jul 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102370/2022
Date: 22.07.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative Shri C.A. Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Reply…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority21 May 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102370/2022
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Time …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority5 Oct 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/12/86925/2021
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 52 - शिकायत संख्या :- Sect-39/I/NCR44/2/86925/202 यशीप प्रियंका गोयल बनाम एटीएस रियल्टी प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक :- 05 /40,/2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-39 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority25 May 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/12/86925/2021
उप्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3, अन्तर्गत धारा 38/40/63 64 - शिकायत संख्या — 'च(]२44/2/86925/202] यशीप प्रियंका गोयल बनाम एटीएस Race प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक :- 25/05/2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-63 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार प…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority11 Mar 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/12/86925/2021
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3, अन्तर्गत धारा 38/40/63 56 - शिकायत संख्या :-+र्टार44॥2/86925/202 यशीप प्रियंका गोयल बनाम एटीएस रियल्टी प्राइवेट लिमिटेड - दिनांक :-44 /03 / 2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-63 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया।…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority12 Sep 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | आदेश पीठ-2 आदेश अन्तर्गत धारा-39 पीठासीन अधिकारी st हरीश त्रिपाठी न्यायनिर्णायक अधिकारी / प्रत्यायोजित अधिकारी शिकायत संख्या- 5०८-३9॥/४८ारा 44/0/033762/2025 निखिल जैन (आवंटी) बनाम राइज प्रोजेक्ट्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड (प्रमोटर) yw (विनियमन एवं विकास) अ…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority30 Jul 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was absent, and learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for the respondent. The respondent's [?] was heard. The file is reserved for orders. Digitally signed by HARISH TRIPATHI, Date: 2026.08.0 4:03:00 +05'…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority26 May 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025
Judgment and Order under Section 34 read with Section 37 Present: Shri T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint No.: NCR44/I0/733762/2025 Nikhil Jain vs. Rise Projects Pvt. Ltd. The present complaint application has been instituted by the complainant against the opposite party seeking possession of the unit and interest for the …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority7 May 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Kush Vats appeared for the complainant. For the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The parties may, if they wish, file their respective written arguments before the Authority within …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority8 Jan 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Kushvats appeared for the complainant. For the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The respondent's learned advocate has requested time to…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority8 Jan 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/10/133762/2025
Hon'ble Chairman, U.P. RERA / Presiding Officer Bench-04 It is respectfully brought to notice that on date 24-42-2025 hearing date is fixed in complaints before the Hon'ble Bench-0॥ in RERA Regional Office, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddha Nagar, but on the said date due to unavoidable reasons, it is proposed to adjourn co…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority19 Aug 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/06/109377/2023
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-39 दिनांक: 9-08-2026 शिकायत संख्या: 5००-39//#0८744/06/09377/2023 महालक्ष्मी इन्फ्राहोम प्रा. लि. बनाम मुकेश पाल सिंह यादव व अन्य आदेश प्रार्थी / बिल्डर का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority8 Jul 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/06/109377/2023
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-39 दिनांक: 08-07-2026 शिकायत संख्या: Sect-39/I/NCR44/06/09377/2023 महालक्ष्मी इन्फ्राहोम प्रा. लि. बनाम मुकेश पाल सिंह यादव व अन्य आदेश प्रार्थी / बिल्डर का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवा…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority19 Jun 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/06/109377/2023
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-39 दिनांक: 9-06-2026 शिकायत संख्या: Sect-39/l/NCR44/06/09377/2023 महालक्ष्मी इन्फ्राहोम प्रा. लि. बनाम मुकेश पाल सिंह व अन्य आदेश weft ,/, बिल्डर का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority18 Mar 2026
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR144/06/109377/2023
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-39 दिनांक: 8-03-2026 शिकायत संख्या: Sect-39//NCR44/06/]09377/2023 महालक्ष्मी इन्फ्राहोम प्रा. लि. बनाम मुकेश पाल सिंह यादव व अन्य प्रार्थी / बिल्डर का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority20 Aug 2026
Complaint No. NCR169/12/135461/2025
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 4 - शिकायत संख्या — NCR69/2/3546/2025 प्रदीप कुमार त्यागी बनाम अंसल लैंडमार्क टाउनशिप्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक :- 20/08 /2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-34 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis