⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,941–1,960 · Page 98 of 500
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122633/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar. The learned advocate for the oppos…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122631/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments [?] of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122631/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the opposite com…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122621/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments [?] of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122621/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the opposite com…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority29 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122614/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar. The arguments of the learned advoc…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority1 Apr 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122614/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar. As stated by the learned advocates…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority4 Mar 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122614/2024
Hon'ble Chairman, UP RERA // Presiding Officer, Bench-0[?]4 Respectfully submitted that the hearing of complaints before the Hon'ble Bench-04 at the RERA Regional Office, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar, is fixed for 04-03-2026. Because that date is the great festival of Holi, and the U.P. Government has declared a p…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122511/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. If both parties wish,…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122511/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The opposite company's learned advocate requested 02 weeks' time to upload a prop…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority21 Sep 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122388/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 39 - शिकायत संख्या :- NCRI44/08/22388/2024 लुबना शारिक और आसिया बेगम बनाम ओएसिस रियलटेक प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक :- 24 /09 / 2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-34 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतक…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority3 Jun 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122388/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 40 - शिकायत संख्या :— NCRI44/08/I22388/2024 लुबना शारिक और आसिया बेगम बनाम ओएसिस रियलटेक प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक :- 03/06/2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद ost के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता अ…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority10 Sep 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122383/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 24 - शिकायत संख्या :-]४८टार44/08/22383/2024 सुधीर कुमार और सावित्री देवी बनाम पटेल एडवांस जेवी दिनांक :- 0/09 /2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद os के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से अधिव…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority25 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122383/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 25 - शिकायत संख्या —NCRI44/08/22383/2024 सुधीर कुमार एवं सावित्री देवी बनाम पटेल एडवांस जेवी दिनांक :- 25/05/2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-34 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो asia के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से अधिवक्ता श…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Feb 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122383/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 40 - शिकायत संख्या :-्टार44/08/22383/2024 सुधीर कुमार एवं सावित्री देवी बनाम पटेल एडवांस जेवी दिनांक :-23 /02 /2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद ast के अन्तर्गत वीडियो oR के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से अधिवक्ता श्री …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority10 Sep 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122366/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 23 — शिकायत संख्या --NCR44/08/I22366/2024 इकबाल अहमद और रेहाना बनाम पटेल एडवांस जेवी दिनांक :- 40,//09 /2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-34 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से अधिवक्…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Feb 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122366/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 39 - शिकायत संख्या > NCR44/08/22366/2024 इकबाल अहमद एवं रेहाना बनाम पटेल एडवांस जेवी शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-34 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो api के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से अधिवक्ता श्री अनुराग तिवारी उपस्थित | वि…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122276/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. The learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared for the opposite party. The arguments of the learned advocates of both parties were heard at lengt…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122276/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The opposite company's learned advocate requested 02 weeks' time…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority24 Sep 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122165/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 40 — शिकायत संख्या —NCRI44/08/2265/2024 सतेंद्र सिंह बनाम एटीएस Raed प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक :- 24/09 /2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद asi} अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता स्वयं उपस्थित विपक्षी …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
1,941–1,960 · Page 98 of 500
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122633/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar. The learned advocate for the oppos…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122631/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments [?] of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122631/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the opposite com…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122621/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments [?] of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122621/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the opposite com…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority29 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122614/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar. The arguments of the learned advoc…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority1 Apr 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122614/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar. As stated by the learned advocates…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority4 Mar 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122614/2024
Hon'ble Chairman, UP RERA // Presiding Officer, Bench-0[?]4 Respectfully submitted that the hearing of complaints before the Hon'ble Bench-04 at the RERA Regional Office, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar, is fixed for 04-03-2026. Because that date is the great festival of Holi, and the U.P. Government has declared a p…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122511/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. If both parties wish,…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122511/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The opposite company's learned advocate requested 02 weeks' time to upload a prop…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority21 Sep 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122388/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 39 - शिकायत संख्या :- NCRI44/08/22388/2024 लुबना शारिक और आसिया बेगम बनाम ओएसिस रियलटेक प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक :- 24 /09 / 2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-34 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतक…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority3 Jun 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122388/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 40 - शिकायत संख्या :— NCRI44/08/I22388/2024 लुबना शारिक और आसिया बेगम बनाम ओएसिस रियलटेक प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक :- 03/06/2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद ost के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता अ…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority10 Sep 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122383/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 24 - शिकायत संख्या :-]४८टार44/08/22383/2024 सुधीर कुमार और सावित्री देवी बनाम पटेल एडवांस जेवी दिनांक :- 0/09 /2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद os के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से अधिव…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority25 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122383/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 25 - शिकायत संख्या —NCRI44/08/22383/2024 सुधीर कुमार एवं सावित्री देवी बनाम पटेल एडवांस जेवी दिनांक :- 25/05/2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-34 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो asia के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से अधिवक्ता श…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Feb 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122383/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 40 - शिकायत संख्या :-्टार44/08/22383/2024 सुधीर कुमार एवं सावित्री देवी बनाम पटेल एडवांस जेवी दिनांक :-23 /02 /2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद ast के अन्तर्गत वीडियो oR के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से अधिवक्ता श्री …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority10 Sep 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122366/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 23 — शिकायत संख्या --NCR44/08/I22366/2024 इकबाल अहमद और रेहाना बनाम पटेल एडवांस जेवी दिनांक :- 40,//09 /2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-34 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से अधिवक्…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Feb 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122366/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 39 - शिकायत संख्या > NCR44/08/22366/2024 इकबाल अहमद एवं रेहाना बनाम पटेल एडवांस जेवी शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-34 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो api के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से अधिवक्ता श्री अनुराग तिवारी उपस्थित | वि…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122276/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. The learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared for the opposite party. The arguments of the learned advocates of both parties were heard at lengt…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122276/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The opposite company's learned advocate requested 02 weeks' time…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority24 Sep 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122165/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 40 — शिकायत संख्या —NCRI44/08/2265/2024 सतेंद्र सिंह बनाम एटीएस Raed प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक :- 24/09 /2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद asi} अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता स्वयं उपस्थित विपक्षी …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis