⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,921–1,940 · Page 97 of 500
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority20 Feb 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/131885/2025
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant appeared in person. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The complainant's learned Advocate, while clarifying the relief claimed in the memo of complaint…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority17 Sep 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/130002/2025
Hon'ble Chairman, U.P. RERA / Presiding Officer Bench-04 It is respectfully brought to notice that on date t8-09-2026 hearing date is fixed in complaints before the Hon'ble Bench-0 in RERA Regional Office, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddha Nagar. On the said date due to official duties requiring you to be outside headquarte…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority17 Sep 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/130002/2025
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत est दिनांक: 7-09-2026 शिकायत संख्या: NCRI44/08/30002/2025 राज कुमार वर्मा बनाम एस.जे.पी. geod एण्ड रिजॉर्टस प्रा. लि. आदेश शिकायतकर्ता का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प्रस्तुत किया गया…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority15 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/130002/2025
दिनांक: 5-05-2026 शिकायतकर्ता E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-34 शिकायत संख्या: NCRI44/08/I30002/2025 राज कुमार वर्मा बनाम एस.जे.पी. होटल्स एण्ड Roce प्रा. लि. आदेश का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प्रस्तुत किया …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority16 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/130002/2025
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-34 दिनांक: 6-0-2026 शिकायत संख्या: NCRI44/08/I30002/2025 राज कुमार वर्मा बनाम एस.जे.पी. होटल्स एण्ड Roce प्रा. लि. आदेश शिकायतकर्ता का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प्रस्तुत किया ग…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122723/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments [?] of the learned Advocates of both parties were heard at length. If both par…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122723/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122715/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments of the learned Advocates of both parties were heard at length. If both parties…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122715/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122674/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments [?] of the learned Advocates of both parties were heard at length. If both par…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122674/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122673/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. Both…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122673/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122663/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments [?] of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122663/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122659/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. Both…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122659/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122646/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments [?] of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122646/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122633/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments [?] of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
1,921–1,940 · Page 97 of 500
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority20 Feb 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/131885/2025
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant appeared in person. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The complainant's learned Advocate, while clarifying the relief claimed in the memo of complaint…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority17 Sep 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/130002/2025
Hon'ble Chairman, U.P. RERA / Presiding Officer Bench-04 It is respectfully brought to notice that on date t8-09-2026 hearing date is fixed in complaints before the Hon'ble Bench-0 in RERA Regional Office, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddha Nagar. On the said date due to official duties requiring you to be outside headquarte…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority17 Sep 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/130002/2025
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत est दिनांक: 7-09-2026 शिकायत संख्या: NCRI44/08/30002/2025 राज कुमार वर्मा बनाम एस.जे.पी. geod एण्ड रिजॉर्टस प्रा. लि. आदेश शिकायतकर्ता का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प्रस्तुत किया गया…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority15 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/130002/2025
दिनांक: 5-05-2026 शिकायतकर्ता E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-34 शिकायत संख्या: NCRI44/08/I30002/2025 राज कुमार वर्मा बनाम एस.जे.पी. होटल्स एण्ड Roce प्रा. लि. आदेश का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प्रस्तुत किया …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority16 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/130002/2025
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-34 दिनांक: 6-0-2026 शिकायत संख्या: NCRI44/08/I30002/2025 राज कुमार वर्मा बनाम एस.जे.पी. होटल्स एण्ड Roce प्रा. लि. आदेश शिकायतकर्ता का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प्रस्तुत किया ग…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122723/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments [?] of the learned Advocates of both parties were heard at length. If both par…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122723/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122715/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments of the learned Advocates of both parties were heard at length. If both parties…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122715/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122674/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments [?] of the learned Advocates of both parties were heard at length. If both par…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122674/2024
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122673/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. Both…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122673/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122663/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments [?] of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122663/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122659/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. Both…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122659/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122646/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments [?] of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122646/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122633/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments [?] of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis