⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,601–3,620 · Page 181 of 382
Supreme Court of India17 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 672 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 1020
2. Petitioner No.1 has described itself as "Committee for Citizenship Rights of the Chakmas of Arunachal Pradesh" ("CCRC"). According to the averments in the petition, representations were filed with the National Human Rights G Commission ("NHRC") alleging persecution ofChakmas and Hajongs in the State of Arunachal Pra…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 669 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 305
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,601–3,620 · Page 181 of 382
Supreme Court of India17 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 672 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 1020
2. Petitioner No.1 has described itself as "Committee for Citizenship Rights of the Chakmas of Arunachal Pradesh" ("CCRC"). According to the averments in the petition, representations were filed with the National Human Rights G Commission ("NHRC") alleging persecution ofChakmas and Hajongs in the State of Arunachal Pra…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 669 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 305
Allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1. The order passed by the Family Court clearly showed that before passing the impugned order under Section 13-8(1) of the Act, the Family Court made necessary efforts for reconciliation between the parties but the efforts yielded no fruitful result. The Family Court, G before pas…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 668 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 569
570 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 10 S.C.R. A High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No. 8009 of 2015. Malini Poduval for the Appellant. P.H. Parekh (for Parekh & Co.,) for the Respondents. B The Order of the Court was delivered by M. Y. EQBAL, J.: 1. The petitioner has preferred this special leave petiti…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 665 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 402
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. v. PAWAN KUMAR 405 GUPTA With A C.A. No. 3420of2012 C.A. No. 2409 of 2009 R. D.Agrawala, Pavan Kumar, Maneesha Dhir, G…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 664 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 48
Dismissing the appeals, the Court B HELD: 1. The High Court pointed out various discrepancies in the said complaint. Neither any expert evidence was examined nor any acquaintance was called to establish that the complaint was written by c deceased. PW1, wife of deceased also denied the signature on the said complaint a…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 663 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 773
774 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. A asking the Vice-Chairperson to take over the charge of the Chairperson in his place is not only untenable in law but also perverse - Division Bench failed to see that so long as the final adjudication is not done in accordance with law on merits in the election petitions, th…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 661 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 1124
[2015) 9 S.C.R. 1124 ~ A BHANUBENANDANR. v. STATE OF GUJARAT (Criminal Appeal No. 1209 of 2015) B SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 [T. S.THAKUR AND V. GOPALA GOWDA, JJ.) Penal Code, 1860: s.498A, 306 - Dowry death -c Allegation that deceased committed suicide by taking poison as she was harassed for bringing dowry - Conviction of hu…
Supreme Court of India27 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 66 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 779
3. Section 107 of C.P.C. empowers the appellate H ZARIF AHMAD (D) THROUGH LRS. v. MOHD. 781 FAROOQ court to remand a case, but it simultaneously empowers A the appellate court to take additional evidence or to require such evidence to be taken. Rule 24 of Order XU C.P.C. provides that where evidence on record is suffic…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 659 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 1
- On appeal, held: In view of difference of opinion between F two judges, matter referred to larger Bench. Referring the matter to larger Bench, the Court PER V. GOPALA GOWDA.J: G HELD: 1.1 From the interpretation of provisions of Sections 11, 15, 23, 24 and 31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, it is clear that the am…
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 654 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 455
455 H 456 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015) 10 S.C.R. A Judicial notice - Retrial on the ground of unfitness of the counsel- Court taking notice of- Since interest of society is paramount and instead of trials being conducted again on account of unfitness of the counsel, reforms are necessary so that such a situation does n…
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 651 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 445
The State of Meghalaya vs. U. William Mynsong 1987 (2) GLR 221; Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs. G Shillong City Bus Syndicate & Ors. 1996 (8) SCC 7 41: 1996 (3) SCR 942 - referred to. 445 H 446 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 9 S.C.R. A Case Law Reference 1987 (2) GLR 221 referred to. Para 10 1996 (3) SCR 942 ref…
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 65 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 491
PATHUBHA GOVINDJI RATHOD v. STATE OF 493 GUJARAT Meenakshi Arora, Tulika Prakash, Sheeba Khan,Vasav A Anantharaman for the Appellants. Jesal, Hemantika Wahi, Preeti Bhardwaj, Puja Singh for the Respondent. B The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. This appeal is directed against judgment and …
Supreme Court of India7 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 647 · [2015] 13 S.C.R. 1057
1058 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015) 13 S.C.R. ...- A are lapses on the part of the State in the manner in which it conducted the acquisition - No compensation was paid at the time of invocation of urgency provision - Once the State invoked s. 17, it was necessary for it to tend the payment of 80% of the compensation- Sec…
Supreme Court of India7 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 646 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 373
G Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD 1. The order of the'Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission appears to be largely 373 H 374 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 108.C.R. A influenced by a conclusion that the appellant should not have asked for deposit of an amount above the basic price, because in the opini…
Supreme Court of India4 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 644 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 600
[2015] 9 S.C.R. 600 A SMITASUBHASH SAWANT · v. JAGDEESHWARI JAGDISHAMIN & ORS. (Civil Appeal No.6848 of 2015) B SEPTEMBER 04, 2015 [J. CHELAMESWAR AND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.] Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888: c s. 33(1) and 28(k) - Limitation period - For filing election petition - Challenging election of Munic…
Supreme Court of India4 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 643 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 309
Paragraphs 5, 6, 7 and 9- Competent authority to initiate C disciplinary action in terms of Paragraph 9-Against the agent holding licence for carrying on business of superior kerosene oil - Show Cause Notice issued to the agent by Sub-Divisional Controller, Food and Supplies (SCFS) (who represents the District Magistra…
Supreme Court of India4 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 642 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 781
12. 04. 200~ - Therefore he will become eligible for promotion only in the year 2007 i.e. on completion of period of five years after he was absorbed on the post of Steno-typist - His promotion was rightly cancelled for not F having fulfilled the eligibility criteria for promotion -Appeals dismissed. CIVILAPPELLATE JUR…
Supreme Court of India4 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 641 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 395
G CIVIL.APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 216 of2007. Frorn the Judgment and Order Nos. 260-261/2005 -395 H 396 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 9 S.C.R. A NB(C) No. 1343 dated 22.02.2005 of the Customs, Excise and Service TaxAppellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Appeals Nos. E/225-226 of 2004- NB(C). Arijit Prasad, Bald…
Supreme Court of India4 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 640 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 786
[2015] 10 S.C.R. 786 A NIZAM&ANR. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN (Criminal Appeal No.413 of 2007) B SEPTEMBER 04, 2015 [DIPAK MISRA AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860- ss. 302 and 201 - Prosecution under - Based on circumstantial evidence - Conviction by courts C below - On appeal, held: For establishing the guilt on the b…
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 64 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 165
[2015] 1 S.C.R. 165 BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA A v. CRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 4235 of 2014 JANUARY 22, 2015 s. [T.S. THAKUR AND FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, JJ.] Constitution of India, 1950: Article 12 - BCCI - Whether 'State' within the meaning of Article 12 and if not wheth…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1. The order passed by the Family Court clearly showed that before passing the impugned order under Section 13-8(1) of the Act, the Family Court made necessary efforts for reconciliation between the parties but the efforts yielded no fruitful result. The Family Court, G before pas…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 668 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 569
570 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 10 S.C.R. A High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No. 8009 of 2015. Malini Poduval for the Appellant. P.H. Parekh (for Parekh & Co.,) for the Respondents. B The Order of the Court was delivered by M. Y. EQBAL, J.: 1. The petitioner has preferred this special leave petiti…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 665 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 402
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. v. PAWAN KUMAR 405 GUPTA With A C.A. No. 3420of2012 C.A. No. 2409 of 2009 R. D.Agrawala, Pavan Kumar, Maneesha Dhir, G…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 664 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 48
Dismissing the appeals, the Court B HELD: 1. The High Court pointed out various discrepancies in the said complaint. Neither any expert evidence was examined nor any acquaintance was called to establish that the complaint was written by c deceased. PW1, wife of deceased also denied the signature on the said complaint a…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 663 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 773
774 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. A asking the Vice-Chairperson to take over the charge of the Chairperson in his place is not only untenable in law but also perverse - Division Bench failed to see that so long as the final adjudication is not done in accordance with law on merits in the election petitions, th…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 661 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 1124
[2015) 9 S.C.R. 1124 ~ A BHANUBENANDANR. v. STATE OF GUJARAT (Criminal Appeal No. 1209 of 2015) B SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 [T. S.THAKUR AND V. GOPALA GOWDA, JJ.) Penal Code, 1860: s.498A, 306 - Dowry death -c Allegation that deceased committed suicide by taking poison as she was harassed for bringing dowry - Conviction of hu…
Supreme Court of India27 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 66 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 779
3. Section 107 of C.P.C. empowers the appellate H ZARIF AHMAD (D) THROUGH LRS. v. MOHD. 781 FAROOQ court to remand a case, but it simultaneously empowers A the appellate court to take additional evidence or to require such evidence to be taken. Rule 24 of Order XU C.P.C. provides that where evidence on record is suffic…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 659 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 1
- On appeal, held: In view of difference of opinion between F two judges, matter referred to larger Bench. Referring the matter to larger Bench, the Court PER V. GOPALA GOWDA.J: G HELD: 1.1 From the interpretation of provisions of Sections 11, 15, 23, 24 and 31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, it is clear that the am…
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 654 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 455
455 H 456 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015) 10 S.C.R. A Judicial notice - Retrial on the ground of unfitness of the counsel- Court taking notice of- Since interest of society is paramount and instead of trials being conducted again on account of unfitness of the counsel, reforms are necessary so that such a situation does n…
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 651 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 445
The State of Meghalaya vs. U. William Mynsong 1987 (2) GLR 221; Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs. G Shillong City Bus Syndicate & Ors. 1996 (8) SCC 7 41: 1996 (3) SCR 942 - referred to. 445 H 446 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 9 S.C.R. A Case Law Reference 1987 (2) GLR 221 referred to. Para 10 1996 (3) SCR 942 ref…
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 65 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 491
PATHUBHA GOVINDJI RATHOD v. STATE OF 493 GUJARAT Meenakshi Arora, Tulika Prakash, Sheeba Khan,Vasav A Anantharaman for the Appellants. Jesal, Hemantika Wahi, Preeti Bhardwaj, Puja Singh for the Respondent. B The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. This appeal is directed against judgment and …
Supreme Court of India7 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 647 · [2015] 13 S.C.R. 1057
1058 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015) 13 S.C.R. ...- A are lapses on the part of the State in the manner in which it conducted the acquisition - No compensation was paid at the time of invocation of urgency provision - Once the State invoked s. 17, it was necessary for it to tend the payment of 80% of the compensation- Sec…
Supreme Court of India7 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 646 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 373
G Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD 1. The order of the'Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission appears to be largely 373 H 374 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 108.C.R. A influenced by a conclusion that the appellant should not have asked for deposit of an amount above the basic price, because in the opini…
Supreme Court of India4 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 644 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 600
[2015] 9 S.C.R. 600 A SMITASUBHASH SAWANT · v. JAGDEESHWARI JAGDISHAMIN & ORS. (Civil Appeal No.6848 of 2015) B SEPTEMBER 04, 2015 [J. CHELAMESWAR AND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.] Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888: c s. 33(1) and 28(k) - Limitation period - For filing election petition - Challenging election of Munic…
Supreme Court of India4 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 643 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 309
Paragraphs 5, 6, 7 and 9- Competent authority to initiate C disciplinary action in terms of Paragraph 9-Against the agent holding licence for carrying on business of superior kerosene oil - Show Cause Notice issued to the agent by Sub-Divisional Controller, Food and Supplies (SCFS) (who represents the District Magistra…
Supreme Court of India4 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 642 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 781
12. 04. 200~ - Therefore he will become eligible for promotion only in the year 2007 i.e. on completion of period of five years after he was absorbed on the post of Steno-typist - His promotion was rightly cancelled for not F having fulfilled the eligibility criteria for promotion -Appeals dismissed. CIVILAPPELLATE JUR…
Supreme Court of India4 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 641 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 395
G CIVIL.APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 216 of2007. Frorn the Judgment and Order Nos. 260-261/2005 -395 H 396 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 9 S.C.R. A NB(C) No. 1343 dated 22.02.2005 of the Customs, Excise and Service TaxAppellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Appeals Nos. E/225-226 of 2004- NB(C). Arijit Prasad, Bald…
Supreme Court of India4 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 640 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 786
[2015] 10 S.C.R. 786 A NIZAM&ANR. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN (Criminal Appeal No.413 of 2007) B SEPTEMBER 04, 2015 [DIPAK MISRA AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860- ss. 302 and 201 - Prosecution under - Based on circumstantial evidence - Conviction by courts C below - On appeal, held: For establishing the guilt on the b…
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 64 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 165
[2015] 1 S.C.R. 165 BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA A v. CRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 4235 of 2014 JANUARY 22, 2015 s. [T.S. THAKUR AND FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, JJ.] Constitution of India, 1950: Article 12 - BCCI - Whether 'State' within the meaning of Article 12 and if not wheth…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis