⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
241–260 · Page 13 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CMP.M/1311/2026
Office shall also give a report regarding pendency of the Reference as per order dated 05.09.2018. On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the sole respondent, returnable on or before the next date of hearing. List on 27.08.2026 a/w LPA No.403 of 2026. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice ( Bipin C. Negi ) Augus…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
241–260 · Page 13 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CMP.M/1311/2026
Office shall also give a report regarding pendency of the Reference as per order dated 05.09.2018. On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the sole respondent, returnable on or before the next date of hearing. List on 27.08.2026 a/w LPA No.403 of 2026. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice ( Bipin C. Negi ) Augus…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14414/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.14414 of 2026 Decided on 24th August, 2026 Deepak Thakur …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Yogesgh Kumar Chandel, Advocate. …
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CARAP(M)/19/2026
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge August 24, 2026 (Sunil)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Aug 2026Full text
CR.A/283/2011
2. Since common questions of facts and law are involved in the above captioned appeals and all the appeals are directed against common judgment dated 22.7.2011, this Court after having clubbed them together, heard the same together and are now being disposed of vide this common judgment. 3. Quintessential facts, which …
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35780 · LPA/72/2020
2026:HHC:35780 aggrieved by the said directions whereby Sudama Ram Sharma was given certain benefits and the Centre Government and the State Government had been directed to take a lenient view, permitting him to use the land keeping in view the fact that there was no approach road to his land. 2. It is to be noticed th…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35780 · LPA/7/2021
2026:HHC:35780 aggrieved by the said directions whereby Sudama Ram Sharma was given certain benefits and the Centre Government and the State Government had been directed to take a lenient view, permitting him to use the land keeping in view the fact that there was no approach road to his land. 2. It is to be noticed th…
Himachal Pradesh High Court21 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/8574/2025
miscellaneous applications, if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 21st August, 2026 (anita)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court21 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35836 · ARB.C/159/2026
2026:HHC:35836 Contract Agreement vide letter dated 17.11.2025 (Annexure A-7), for the appointment of a sole Arbitrator. 3. The respondents had responded to the same, whereby an offer had been made that the view of the respondents was that the Clause 12 (5) of the Act be waived off, which was regarding the ineligible p…
Himachal Pradesh High Court21 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14259/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court21 Aug 2026Full text
CRMP/3632/2026
From a perusal of the same, it is evident that the applicant in the case at hand was released on 20th August, 2026, subsequent to the deposit of the compounding fee in the case at hand with the concerned Legal Services Authority. In the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances, learned counsel appearing on behalf of…
Himachal Pradesh High Court21 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14412/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
EX.P./1691/2026
3. In view of the above, these proceedings are closed, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, with directions to the respondents to file compliance affidavit on or before 23.09.2026. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 20 2026 (Rishi) 22 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgmen…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
CRMMO/336/2024
August 20, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
EX.P./1696/2026
3. In view of the above, these proceedings are closed, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, with directions to the respondents to file compliance affidavit on or before 23.09.2026. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 20 2026 (Rishi) 23 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgmen…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14211/2026
4. This could not be disputed on behalf of the respondents-Department, though learned Additional Advocate General submitted that any order passed in these petitions shall be subject to the right of the State to assail the judgment passed by this Court in Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P (supra). Ordered accordingly…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
CRMPM/330/2026
Therefore, in view of the above, the application stands dismissed. Application stands disposed of. Cr.R (ST) No. 582 of 2026 Since, application for condonation has been dismissed, hence, the proposed revision is also disposed of so also the pending miscellaneous applications, if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 20th August…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35247 · COPC/571/2026
2026:HHC:35247 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, the same is closed. 3. However, if the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to them under the law. The petition is dispo…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35429 · CWP/6167/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35218 · CWP/10560/2026
2026:HHC:35218 including the previous writ petition instituted by him as also the orders/judgments passed therein, as under:-“CMP No. 15523/2026 Heard and considered the case file. 2. The petitioner seeks direction to allow him to provisionally attend the classes of the 9th Semester as, according to him, he has already…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14209/2026
4. This could not be disputed on behalf of the respondents-Department, though learned Additional Advocate General submitted that any order passed in these petitions shall be subject to the right of the State to assail the judgment passed by this Court in Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P (supra). Ordered accordingly…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
CWP/14414/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.14414 of 2026 Decided on 24th August, 2026 Deepak Thakur …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Yogesgh Kumar Chandel, Advocate. …
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CARAP(M)/19/2026
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge August 24, 2026 (Sunil)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Aug 2026Full text
CR.A/283/2011
2. Since common questions of facts and law are involved in the above captioned appeals and all the appeals are directed against common judgment dated 22.7.2011, this Court after having clubbed them together, heard the same together and are now being disposed of vide this common judgment. 3. Quintessential facts, which …
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35780 · LPA/72/2020
2026:HHC:35780 aggrieved by the said directions whereby Sudama Ram Sharma was given certain benefits and the Centre Government and the State Government had been directed to take a lenient view, permitting him to use the land keeping in view the fact that there was no approach road to his land. 2. It is to be noticed th…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35780 · LPA/7/2021
2026:HHC:35780 aggrieved by the said directions whereby Sudama Ram Sharma was given certain benefits and the Centre Government and the State Government had been directed to take a lenient view, permitting him to use the land keeping in view the fact that there was no approach road to his land. 2. It is to be noticed th…
Himachal Pradesh High Court21 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/8574/2025
miscellaneous applications, if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 21st August, 2026 (anita)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court21 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35836 · ARB.C/159/2026
2026:HHC:35836 Contract Agreement vide letter dated 17.11.2025 (Annexure A-7), for the appointment of a sole Arbitrator. 3. The respondents had responded to the same, whereby an offer had been made that the view of the respondents was that the Clause 12 (5) of the Act be waived off, which was regarding the ineligible p…
Himachal Pradesh High Court21 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14259/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court21 Aug 2026Full text
CRMP/3632/2026
From a perusal of the same, it is evident that the applicant in the case at hand was released on 20th August, 2026, subsequent to the deposit of the compounding fee in the case at hand with the concerned Legal Services Authority. In the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances, learned counsel appearing on behalf of…
Himachal Pradesh High Court21 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14412/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
EX.P./1691/2026
3. In view of the above, these proceedings are closed, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, with directions to the respondents to file compliance affidavit on or before 23.09.2026. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 20 2026 (Rishi) 22 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgmen…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
CRMMO/336/2024
August 20, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
EX.P./1696/2026
3. In view of the above, these proceedings are closed, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, with directions to the respondents to file compliance affidavit on or before 23.09.2026. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 20 2026 (Rishi) 23 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgmen…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14211/2026
4. This could not be disputed on behalf of the respondents-Department, though learned Additional Advocate General submitted that any order passed in these petitions shall be subject to the right of the State to assail the judgment passed by this Court in Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P (supra). Ordered accordingly…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
CRMPM/330/2026
Therefore, in view of the above, the application stands dismissed. Application stands disposed of. Cr.R (ST) No. 582 of 2026 Since, application for condonation has been dismissed, hence, the proposed revision is also disposed of so also the pending miscellaneous applications, if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 20th August…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35247 · COPC/571/2026
2026:HHC:35247 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, the same is closed. 3. However, if the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to them under the law. The petition is dispo…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35429 · CWP/6167/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35218 · CWP/10560/2026
2026:HHC:35218 including the previous writ petition instituted by him as also the orders/judgments passed therein, as under:-“CMP No. 15523/2026 Heard and considered the case file. 2. The petitioner seeks direction to allow him to provisionally attend the classes of the 9th Semester as, according to him, he has already…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14209/2026
4. This could not be disputed on behalf of the respondents-Department, though learned Additional Advocate General submitted that any order passed in these petitions shall be subject to the right of the State to assail the judgment passed by this Court in Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P (supra). Ordered accordingly…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis