Dagu Ram Vs. Lakshmi Kant and Anr. Cr. MP No.3632 of 2026 in Cr.MMO No.1264 of 2024 21.08.2026 Present: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for respondent No.1. Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2/State. Mr. Vikas Bhatnagar, Superintendent, Central Jail, Kanda, Mr. Anil Kumar, Deputy Superintendent, Jail, Kanda, and Mr. Mohan Naryal, Head Warder, Central Jail, Kanda, are present in person. Cr. MP No.3632 of 2026 The Jail Superintendent, Model Central Jail, Kanda, is present in Court. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has placed on record the instructions imparted by the said Jail Superintendent, Model Central Jail, Kanda. The instructions are taken on record. The instructions, along with the documents appended therewith, in detail, mention what transpired post the passing of the order dated 14.08.2026. From a perusal of the same, it is evident that the applicant in the case at hand was released on 20th August, 2026, subsequent to the deposit of the compounding fee in the case at hand with the concerned Legal Services Authority. In the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant does not press the present application. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of as having become infructuous on account of subsequent events. (Bipin C. Negi) Judge 21st August, 2026 (Tarun)

Dagu Ram Vs. Lakshmi Kant and Anr. Cr. MP No.3632 of 2026 in Cr.MMO No.1264 of 2024 21.08.2026 Present: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for respondent No.1. Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2/State. Mr. Vikas Bhatnagar, Superintendent, Central Jail, Kanda, Mr. Anil Kumar, Deputy Superintendent, Jail, Kanda, and Mr. Mohan Naryal, Head Warder, Central Jail, Kanda, are present in person. Cr. MP No.3632 of 2026 The Jail Superintendent, Model Central Jail, Kanda, is present in Court. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has placed on record the instructions imparted by the said Jail Superintendent, Model Central Jail, Kanda. The instructions are taken on record. The instructions, along with the documents appended therewith, in detail, mention what transpired post the passing of the order dated 14.08.2026. From a perusal of the same, it is evident that the applicant in the case at hand was released on 20th August, 2026, subsequent to the deposit of the compounding fee in the case at hand with the concerned Legal Services Authority. In the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant does not press the present application. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of as having become infructuous on account of subsequent events. (Bipin C. Negi) Judge 21st August, 2026 (Tarun)