2026:HHC:35247 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.571 of 2026 Date of Decision: 20.08.2026 ___________________________________________________ Vikas and another ....Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar and another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Afreen Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 19.08.2026, wherein it has been stated that an amount of Rs.30,858/- has been credited to the account of petitioner No.1, and the bills of petitioner No.2 have been re-submitted to the concerned Treasury after removal of the objections. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2026:HHC:35247 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, the same is closed. 3. However, if the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to them under the law. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) August 20, 2026 Judge (Kiran)

2026:HHC:35247 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.571 of 2026 Date of Decision: 20.08.2026 ___________________________________________________ Vikas and another ....Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar and another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Afreen Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 19.08.2026, wherein it has been stated that an amount of Rs.30,858/- has been credited to the account of petitioner No.1, and the bills of petitioner No.2 have been re-submitted to the concerned Treasury after removal of the objections. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2026:HHC:35247 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, the same is closed. 3. However, if the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to them under the law. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) August 20, 2026 Judge (Kiran)