IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No.336 of 2024 Date of Decision: 20.8.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Suresh Kaushal ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent No.1/State. Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage. 2. Ordered accordingly. Pending applications also stand disposed of. August 20, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No.336 of 2024 Date of Decision: 20.8.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Suresh Kaushal ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent No.1/State. Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage. 2. Ordered accordingly. Pending applications also stand disposed of. August 20, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge