Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
221–240 · Page 12 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14558/2026
appended with the writ petition as Annexure-P4 shall be decided by the competent Authority, in the light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Moha…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
EX.P./1742/2026
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
221–240 · Page 12 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14558/2026
appended with the writ petition as Annexure-P4 shall be decided by the competent Authority, in the light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Moha…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
EX.P./1742/2026
3. In view of the above, these proceedings are closed. 4. For compliance of this part of the order, list on 24.09.2026. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 25 , 2026 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CMP/21567/2026
Tara Chand Vs. Dr. Nipun Jindal & Ors. COPC No. 847/2025 25.08.2026 Present: Mr. R.K. Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents. CMP No. 21567/2026 Learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record a copy of office letter dated 25.08.2026, which inter alia reads as und…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14547/2026
appended with the writ petition as Annexure-P4 shall be decided by the competent Authority, in the light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Moha…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
OMPM/330/2026
As per the applicant, earlier also, due to inefficiency and lackadaisical attitude of the law firm, namely, M/s M.V. Kini & Co, cases were withdrawn from it on 20.09.2023. It is further submitted that the applicant was under bonafide belief that the instant case is pending before the learned District Judge, Bilaspur an…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14553/2026
appended with the writ petition as Annexure-P4 shall be decided by the competent Authority, in the light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Moha…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:36647 · CWPOA/6281/2019
2026:HHC:36647 dated 9.8.2012 in respect of grant of notional benefits. iii) For directions to the respondents not to discriminate the applicants vis-à-vis HPAS officers in respect of grant of notional benefit of 4-tier of pay scales as made applicable to HPAS officers vide annexure A-4 and A-6 dated 30.8.2012. iv) For…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CMPMO/400/2026
2 2. Parties to the lis are, hereinafter referred to, in the same manner, in which, they were referred to, by the learned Tribunal. 3. The claimant has filed the claim petition, under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter referred to as, ‘the M.V. Act’), against the respondents, being owner, driver and Ins…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
ARB.C/166/2026
-2- resolve the dispute between the parties arising out of agreement dated 28.09.2017, under Section 11 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 and vide order dated 09.08.2024, Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.S. Walia (Retd.) was appointed as sole Arbitrator. 4. The learned sole Arbitrator entered upon the reference after …
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CRMP/3482/2026
3 4. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid judgment passed by learned first appellate court, applicant-accused preferred Criminal Revision No.660 of 2025 in this Court, which also came to be dismissed vide judgment dated 03.07.2026. 5. Since after passing of aforesaid judgment dated 03.07.2026, applicant-…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35824 · COPC/669/2025
2 2026:HHC:35824 petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged. 3. However, if the petitioner is sill still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to him under the law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( Sushil …
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14578/2026
For the respondent(s): Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 4 in all the petitions Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 2 & 3, in all the petitions. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Notice confined to respondents No.1 to 4, which is waived by Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Adv…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35996 · EX.PT/22/2026
2. Similarly, Mr. Sat Pal has been granted work charge status w.e.f. 01.01.2004 on completion of eight years of continuous service on daily wage basis and has been given the benefit of regularization w.e.f. 23.08.2007. 2 2026:HHC:35996 3. Accordingly, the present execution petition is disposed of as having been rendere…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35834 · CMPMO/113/2026
2 ( 2026:HHC:35834 ) 2. It has not been disputed by learned counsel appearing for the parties that the right to file reply to the petition has been closed on the third opportunity. 3. Considering the fact that parties should be given the opportunity to defend the case set up by the opposite party in the above titled ren…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/13782/2026
? Yes…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CR.A/517/2012
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge August 24, 2026 (sunil) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35826 · COPC/1038/2026
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:35826 ) 4. The petition, so also pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 24th August, 2026 Judge (raman)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14576/2026
For the respondent(s): Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 4 in all the petitions Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 2 & 3, in all the petitions. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Notice confined to respondents No.1 to 4, which is waived by Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Adv…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
2026 INSC 48 · OMPM/222/2024
(D) through LRs vs. Gopal, 2026 INSC 48, then, instead of bringing on record the LRs of respondent No. 4, his name is required to be deleted, as his estate is being represented by his sons. Relevant paragraph-40 of the judgment is reproduced as under: “40. The decision in Dwarka Prasad (supra), relied by the learned co…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14417/2026
Judge August 24, 2026 (Vinod)…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
3. In view of the above, these proceedings are closed. 4. For compliance of this part of the order, list on 24.09.2026. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 25 , 2026 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CMP/21567/2026
Tara Chand Vs. Dr. Nipun Jindal & Ors. COPC No. 847/2025 25.08.2026 Present: Mr. R.K. Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents. CMP No. 21567/2026 Learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record a copy of office letter dated 25.08.2026, which inter alia reads as und…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14547/2026
appended with the writ petition as Annexure-P4 shall be decided by the competent Authority, in the light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Moha…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
OMPM/330/2026
As per the applicant, earlier also, due to inefficiency and lackadaisical attitude of the law firm, namely, M/s M.V. Kini & Co, cases were withdrawn from it on 20.09.2023. It is further submitted that the applicant was under bonafide belief that the instant case is pending before the learned District Judge, Bilaspur an…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14553/2026
appended with the writ petition as Annexure-P4 shall be decided by the competent Authority, in the light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Moha…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:36647 · CWPOA/6281/2019
2026:HHC:36647 dated 9.8.2012 in respect of grant of notional benefits. iii) For directions to the respondents not to discriminate the applicants vis-à-vis HPAS officers in respect of grant of notional benefit of 4-tier of pay scales as made applicable to HPAS officers vide annexure A-4 and A-6 dated 30.8.2012. iv) For…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CMPMO/400/2026
2 2. Parties to the lis are, hereinafter referred to, in the same manner, in which, they were referred to, by the learned Tribunal. 3. The claimant has filed the claim petition, under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter referred to as, ‘the M.V. Act’), against the respondents, being owner, driver and Ins…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
ARB.C/166/2026
-2- resolve the dispute between the parties arising out of agreement dated 28.09.2017, under Section 11 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 and vide order dated 09.08.2024, Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.S. Walia (Retd.) was appointed as sole Arbitrator. 4. The learned sole Arbitrator entered upon the reference after …
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CRMP/3482/2026
3 4. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid judgment passed by learned first appellate court, applicant-accused preferred Criminal Revision No.660 of 2025 in this Court, which also came to be dismissed vide judgment dated 03.07.2026. 5. Since after passing of aforesaid judgment dated 03.07.2026, applicant-…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35824 · COPC/669/2025
2 2026:HHC:35824 petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged. 3. However, if the petitioner is sill still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to him under the law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( Sushil …
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14578/2026
For the respondent(s): Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 4 in all the petitions Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 2 & 3, in all the petitions. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Notice confined to respondents No.1 to 4, which is waived by Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Adv…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35996 · EX.PT/22/2026
2. Similarly, Mr. Sat Pal has been granted work charge status w.e.f. 01.01.2004 on completion of eight years of continuous service on daily wage basis and has been given the benefit of regularization w.e.f. 23.08.2007. 2 2026:HHC:35996 3. Accordingly, the present execution petition is disposed of as having been rendere…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35834 · CMPMO/113/2026
2 ( 2026:HHC:35834 ) 2. It has not been disputed by learned counsel appearing for the parties that the right to file reply to the petition has been closed on the third opportunity. 3. Considering the fact that parties should be given the opportunity to defend the case set up by the opposite party in the above titled ren…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/13782/2026
? Yes…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CR.A/517/2012
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge August 24, 2026 (sunil) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:35826 · COPC/1038/2026
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:35826 ) 4. The petition, so also pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 24th August, 2026 Judge (raman)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14576/2026
For the respondent(s): Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 4 in all the petitions Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 2 & 3, in all the petitions. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Notice confined to respondents No.1 to 4, which is waived by Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Adv…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
2026 INSC 48 · OMPM/222/2024
(D) through LRs vs. Gopal, 2026 INSC 48, then, instead of bringing on record the LRs of respondent No. 4, his name is required to be deleted, as his estate is being represented by his sons. Relevant paragraph-40 of the judgment is reproduced as under: “40. The decision in Dwarka Prasad (supra), relied by the learned co…
Himachal Pradesh High Court24 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14417/2026
Judge August 24, 2026 (Vinod)…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis