1 ( 2026:HHC:35834 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No.113 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.08.2026 Yudhvir Singh …Petitioner Versus Sumeer Nath …..Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate. __________________________________________________________ Virender Singh, Judge (Oral) The petitioner, who has been arrayed as respondent/tenant in the rent petition, titled as Sumeer Nath versus Yudhvir Singh @ Vijay Chandel, bearing Rent Case No.234 of 2024, pending adjudication before the Court of learned Rent Controller, Court No.1, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the Rent Controller), has approached this Court to permit him to file reply to the rent petition. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:35834 ) 2. It has not been disputed by learned counsel appearing for the parties that the right to file reply to the petition has been closed on the third opportunity.

3. Considering the fact that parties should be given the opportunity to defend the case set up by the opposite party in the above titled rent petition, the order dated 01.12.2025, is set-aside and the tenant is directed to file reply, within a period of seven days, subject to cost of Rs.5,000/-. 4. The parties to the present petition are directed to appear before the Rent Controller, Court No.1, Shimla, on 01.09.2026. On that day, the tenant will file the reply to the petition. 5. Consequently, the present petition disposed of accordingly. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge August 24, 2026 (subhash)

1 ( 2026:HHC:35834 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No.113 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.08.2026 Yudhvir Singh …Petitioner Versus Sumeer Nath …..Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate. __________________________________________________________ Virender Singh, Judge (Oral) The petitioner, who has been arrayed as respondent/tenant in the rent petition, titled as Sumeer Nath versus Yudhvir Singh @ Vijay Chandel, bearing Rent Case No.234 of 2024, pending adjudication before the Court of learned Rent Controller, Court No.1, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the Rent Controller), has approached this Court to permit him to file reply to the rent petition. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:35834 ) 2. It has not been disputed by learned counsel appearing for the parties that the right to file reply to the petition has been closed on the third opportunity.

3. Considering the fact that parties should be given the opportunity to defend the case set up by the opposite party in the above titled rent petition, the order dated 01.12.2025, is set-aside and the tenant is directed to file reply, within a period of seven days, subject to cost of Rs.5,000/-. 4. The parties to the present petition are directed to appear before the Rent Controller, Court No.1, Shimla, on 01.09.2026. On that day, the tenant will file the reply to the petition. 5. Consequently, the present petition disposed of accordingly. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge August 24, 2026 (subhash)