IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No.517 of 2012 Date of Decision: 24.08.2026 _______________________________________________________ Smt. Sangeet Sud …….Appellant Versus Sunil Sud & Anr. … Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Appellant: Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P. Sood & Mr. Praveen Chauhan, Advocates. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel for the appellant states that on account of amicable settlement arrived inter se parties, factum whereof has been recorded in the judgment dated 22.07.2026 passed in Cr. Revision No.341 of 2014, present appeal has been rendered infructuous and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the same. Ordered accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge August 24, 2026 (sunil) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No.517 of 2012 Date of Decision: 24.08.2026 _______________________________________________________ Smt. Sangeet Sud …….Appellant Versus Sunil Sud & Anr. … Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Appellant: Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P. Sood & Mr. Praveen Chauhan, Advocates. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel for the appellant states that on account of amicable settlement arrived inter se parties, factum whereof has been recorded in the judgment dated 22.07.2026 passed in Cr. Revision No.341 of 2014, present appeal has been rendered infructuous and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the same. Ordered accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge August 24, 2026 (sunil) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?