IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 13782 of 2026 Decided on: 24.8.2026 Dr. Anish Kumar. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Another …Respondents. Corum Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner. Mr.Rajnish Maniktala, Senior Advocate with Mr.Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge As prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, which is not opposed, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh on same cause of action with better particulars. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. (Ranjan Sharma), Judge. 24th August, 2026 (Keshav) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 13782 of 2026 Decided on: 24.8.2026 Dr. Anish Kumar. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Another …Respondents. Corum Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner. Mr.Rajnish Maniktala, Senior Advocate with Mr.Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge As prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, which is not opposed, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh on same cause of action with better particulars. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. (Ranjan Sharma), Judge. 24th August, 2026 (Keshav) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes