Law on Tips(LOTS)India's Premier Legal News
⌘K
Submit News
Login
  • Home
  • The Bar Room
  • The Gazette
  • The Library
  • Legal League
  • Judgments
  • Careers

Law on Tips.

A free Indian legal platform. Bringing you the latest judgments, legislative updates, and in-depth legal analysis from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and Tribunals.

© 2026 Law on Tips Media Pvt Ltd.

Explore

  • The Bar Room
  • The Gazette
  • The Library
  • Compare Acts
  • Legal League
  • Judgments
  • Careers

Trust & Standards

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Fact-Checking
  • Corrections
  • Methodology
  • Ownership
  • Masthead
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact

Subscribe

Get the latest legal news delivered to your inbox daily.

BarNewsActsLeague
Login

Judgment Library

Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.

Search in

70,313 judgments, 1857–2026 · 29,505 with full text · 35 courts

Refine

4 judgments

  • The Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Section 34
  1. Supreme Court of India·2001

    Suresh v. State of U.P.

    (2001) 3 SCC 673

    Active physical presence and participation in furtherance of common intention is required under Section 34; overt act by each individual accused is not necessary once common intention is proved.

    • The Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Section 34
  2. Supreme Court of India·1955

    Pandurang v. State of Hyderabad

Judgment Library

Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.

Search in

70,313 judgments, 1857–2026 · 29,505 with full text · 35 courts

Refine

4 judgments

  • The Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Section 34
  1. Supreme Court of India·2001

    Suresh v. State of U.P.

    (2001) 3 SCC 673

    Active physical presence and participation in furtherance of common intention is required under Section 34; overt act by each individual accused is not necessary once common intention is proved.

    • The Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Section 34
  2. Supreme Court of India·1955

    Pandurang v. State of Hyderabad

Clear filters

Courts

  • Privy Council2
  • Supreme Court of India2

Decade

  • 2000s1
  • 1950s1
  • 1940s1
  • 1920s1
Search tips
  • Citations work in any format: (1978) 1 SCC 248, AIR 1973 SC 1461.
  • Name a provision: 302 IPC, Section 41A CrPC, Article 21.
  • Quotes for a phrase: "rarest of rare".
  • OR for alternatives, a minus sign to exclude: bail -anticipatory.
  • Small spelling mistakes in case names are forgiven.

AIR 1955 SC 216

Common intention requires prior concert or meeting of minds; can develop on the spot, but cannot be inferred merely from similar or parallel acts without prior meeting of minds. | Distinction between common intention and similar intention applied under Section 3(5) BNS.

  • The Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Section 34
  • The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 · Section 3
  • Privy Council·1945

    Mahbub Shah v. King Emperor

    AIR 1945 PC 118

    Classic distinction between common intention (pre-arranged plan and meeting of minds) and similar intention; same or similar intention cannot be equated with common intention under Section 34. | Joint liability and prior concert principles applied to Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (corresponding to Section 34 IPC).

    • The Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Section 34
    • The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 · Section 3
  • Privy Council·1924

    Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor

    AIR 1925 PC 1

    They also serve who only stand and wait; physical presence and participation in furtherance of pre-arranged common intention renders all co-accused equally liable under Section 34.

    • The Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Section 34
  • Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis

    Clear filters

    Courts

    • Privy Council2
    • Supreme Court of India2

    Decade

    • 2000s1
    • 1950s1
    • 1940s1
    • 1920s1
    Search tips
    • Citations work in any format: (1978) 1 SCC 248, AIR 1973 SC 1461.
    • Name a provision: 302 IPC, Section 41A CrPC, Article 21.
    • Quotes for a phrase: "rarest of rare".
    • OR for alternatives, a minus sign to exclude: bail -anticipatory.
    • Small spelling mistakes in case names are forgiven.

    AIR 1955 SC 216

    Common intention requires prior concert or meeting of minds; can develop on the spot, but cannot be inferred merely from similar or parallel acts without prior meeting of minds. | Distinction between common intention and similar intention applied under Section 3(5) BNS.

    • The Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Section 34
    • The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 · Section 3
  • Privy Council·1945

    Mahbub Shah v. King Emperor

    AIR 1945 PC 118

    Classic distinction between common intention (pre-arranged plan and meeting of minds) and similar intention; same or similar intention cannot be equated with common intention under Section 34. | Joint liability and prior concert principles applied to Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (corresponding to Section 34 IPC).

    • The Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Section 34
    • The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 · Section 3
  • Privy Council·1924

    Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor

    AIR 1925 PC 1

    They also serve who only stand and wait; physical presence and participation in furtherance of pre-arranged common intention renders all co-accused equally liable under Section 34.

    • The Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Section 34
  • Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis