Supreme Court of India
Suresh v. State of U.P.
(2001) 3 SCC 673
- Decision date
- 2001
- Text availability
- Summary or case record only
- Bench
- 3-Judge Bench
Source: landmark_precedents seed
Principle
Active physical presence and participation in furtherance of common intention is required under Section 34; overt act by each individual accused is not necessary once common intention is proved.
Connected provisions and cases
Related judgments
- Pandurang v. State of Hyderabad · AIR 1955 SC 216 · 1955 · 1 shared provision
- Mahbub Shah v. King Emperor · AIR 1945 PC 118 · 1945 · 1 shared provision
- Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor · AIR 1925 PC 1 · 1924 · 1 shared provision
Judgment text
Full judgment text is not available in this record.