Privy Council
Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor
AIR 1925 PC 1
- Decision date
- 1924
- Text availability
- Summary or case record only
- Bench
- Privy Council
Source: landmark_precedents seed
Principle
They also serve who only stand and wait; physical presence and participation in furtherance of pre-arranged common intention renders all co-accused equally liable under Section 34.
Connected provisions and cases
Related judgments
- Suresh v. State of U.P. · (2001) 3 SCC 673 · 2001 · 1 shared provision
- Pandurang v. State of Hyderabad · AIR 1955 SC 216 · 1955 · 1 shared provision
- Mahbub Shah v. King Emperor · AIR 1945 PC 118 · 1945 · 1 shared provision
Judgment text
Full judgment text is not available in this record.