Privy Council
Mahbub Shah v. King Emperor
AIR 1945 PC 118
- Decision date
- 1945
- Text availability
- Summary or case record only
- Bench
- Privy Council
Source: landmark_precedents seed
Principle
Classic distinction between common intention (pre-arranged plan and meeting of minds) and similar intention; same or similar intention cannot be equated with common intention under Section 34. | Joint liability and prior concert principles applied to Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (corresponding to Section 34 IPC).
Connected provisions and cases
Related judgments
- Pandurang v. State of Hyderabad · AIR 1955 SC 216 · 1955 · 2 shared provisions
- Suresh v. State of U.P. · (2001) 3 SCC 673 · 2001 · 1 shared provision
- Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor · AIR 1925 PC 1 · 1924 · 1 shared provision
Judgment text
Full judgment text is not available in this record.