7 Dec 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Shefali Nagpal and Rahul Nagpal v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/10/62560/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent

7 Dec 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

MS Opusing Information Pvt Ltd. through its Director Rakesh Arora v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/09/61295/2020 · for the respondent

1 Dec 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Kaushal Kishore Pande and Vasudha Pande v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/09/59745/2020 · for the respondent

13 Nov 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Sapna Gupta v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/07/56612/2020 · for the respondent

9 Nov 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Prabhat Kumar Maheshwari v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/54366/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

(Balvinder Kumar) (Member) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority

21 Oct 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Prabhat Kumar Maheshwari v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/54366/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddha Nagar Hearing Bench-2 E-Court 48-Complaint Number — NCR44/06/54366/2020 Amitabh v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Date: 24/40/2020 Keeping in view COVID-49, hearing was conducted through Video Conferencing & and the complainant's suit was presented.

14 Oct 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Ruhi Bhatia v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/54604/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

14 Oct 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Raag Sethi v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/54590/2020 · Bench 3 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

28 Sep 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Vimal Nagpal v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/52641/2020 · for the respondent

Undated·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Newton Singh v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102370/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Attendance:- T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint Number:-NCR45//02370/2022 Newton Singh versus Rise Projects Private Limited The applicant/complainant's complaint was presented for final arguments through video conferencing on date 30-70-2025. On call, his representative C.A. Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complaina

Undated·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Shailesh Gupta v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/11/102421/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Attendance:- T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint No.—NCR45/I/0242/2022 Shailesh Gupta versus Rise Projects Private Limited The applicant / complainant's complaint was presented for final arguments through video conferencing on date 30-40-2025. On call, his representative C.A. Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complaina

Undated·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Newton Singh v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/11/102370/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Attendance:- T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint Number:-NCR45//02370/2022 Newton Singh versus Rise Projects Private Limited The applicant/complainant's complaint was presented for final arguments through video conferencing on date 30-70-2025. On call, his representative C.A. Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complaina

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Mohd. Shakeel Ahmad v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/10/133311/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent

The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, on behalf of the complainant, learned advocate Shri Harpreet Arora appeared. On behalf of the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Punit Jain appeared. The learned advocate for the opposite company has requested time to uploa

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Dr Chitra v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/10/101281/2022 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. When the matter was called, the complainant's learned advocate Shri Viren appeared for the complainant, and Shri Puneet Jain, learned advocate, appeared for the respondent. The complainant's learned advocate informed that the order passed under Section 34

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Dr Chitra v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/10/101281/2022 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

(Member), UP Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Dr Chitra v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/10/101281/2022 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Hearing Bench-II 26. Complaint No.: NCR45/40/028/2022 Dr. Chitra vs. Rise Projects Pvt. Ltd. Date: 47/04/2023 The complainant's case under Section 34 was presented through video [?]. When the matter was called, the complainant [?] was p

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Dr Chitra v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/10/101281/2022 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Hearing Bench-II 48. Complaint No.: NCRI45/0/0I28i/2022 Dr. Chitra vs. Rise Projects Pvt. Ltd. Date: 04/07/2023 The complainant's case under Section 34 was presented through video conferencing. When the matter was called, the complainan

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Shilpi Singhal and Sandeep Singhal v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/08/111676/2023 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, Ms. Jyoti, learned advocate, appeared on behalf of the complainant. Shri Puneet Jain, learned advocate, appeared on behalf of the opposite party. The arguments of both parties were heard in detail. File reserved for orders. HA

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Shilpi Singhal and Sandeep Singhal v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/08/111676/2023 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

UP Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Hearing [?] 45. Complaint No.: NCRI45/08/I676/2023 Shilpi Singhal and Sandeep Singhal vs. Rise Projects Private Limited Date: 44/42/2023 The complainant's case under Section 34 was presented through video [?]. When the matter was called, both part

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Sumit Kapoor v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/07/121052/2024 · Bench 2 · for the respondent

The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. When the matter was called, the complainant was represented by its representative, C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal, and Shri Puneet Jain, learned advocate, appeared for the respondent. The respondent is directed to upload its written reply to the complaint in ques

Undated·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Suresh Chand Sharma v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/07/111181/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The subject case was presented for hearing under Sections 36, 40 and 63 on 2.07.2025, 40.44.2025, 47.03.2026 and 43.07.2026. Learned advocate Ms. Jyoti appeared for the complainant, and learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for the opposite party. After hearing the arguments of both parties, the file was reserved

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Suresh Chand Sharma v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/07/111181/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. When the matter was called, Ms. Jyoti, learned advocate, appeared for the complainant. Shri Puneet Jain, learned advocate, appeared for the respondent. The complainant's learned advocate informed that the order passed under Section 34 has not yet been com

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Kalpana Sharma and Dineshchand Sharma v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/07/111151/2023 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Hearing Bench-2 44-Complaint No.: NCRI45/07/I452/2023 Kalpana Sharma and Dinesh Chand Sharma Vs. Rise Projects Private Limited Date: 4/42/2023 The complainant's case was presented under [?] through video conferencing [?]. On being called, both p

7 Dec 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Shefali Nagpal and Rahul Nagpal v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/10/62560/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent

7 Dec 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

MS Opusing Information Pvt Ltd. through its Director Rakesh Arora v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/09/61295/2020 · for the respondent

1 Dec 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Kaushal Kishore Pande and Vasudha Pande v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/09/59745/2020 · for the respondent

13 Nov 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Sapna Gupta v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/07/56612/2020 · for the respondent

9 Nov 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Prabhat Kumar Maheshwari v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/54366/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

(Balvinder Kumar) (Member) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority

21 Oct 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Prabhat Kumar Maheshwari v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/54366/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddha Nagar Hearing Bench-2 E-Court 48-Complaint Number — NCR44/06/54366/2020 Amitabh v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Date: 24/40/2020 Keeping in view COVID-49, hearing was conducted through Video Conferencing & and the complainant's suit was presented.

14 Oct 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Ruhi Bhatia v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/54604/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

14 Oct 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Raag Sethi v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/06/54590/2020 · Bench 3 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

28 Sep 2020·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Vimal Nagpal v. ATS Realty Private Limited

Complaint No. NCR144/03/52641/2020 · for the respondent

Undated·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Newton Singh v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102370/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Attendance:- T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint Number:-NCR45//02370/2022 Newton Singh versus Rise Projects Private Limited The applicant/complainant's complaint was presented for final arguments through video conferencing on date 30-70-2025. On call, his representative C.A. Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complaina

Undated·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Shailesh Gupta v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/11/102421/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Attendance:- T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint No.—NCR45/I/0242/2022 Shailesh Gupta versus Rise Projects Private Limited The applicant / complainant's complaint was presented for final arguments through video conferencing on date 30-40-2025. On call, his representative C.A. Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complaina

Undated·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Newton Singh v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/11/102370/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Attendance:- T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint Number:-NCR45//02370/2022 Newton Singh versus Rise Projects Private Limited The applicant/complainant's complaint was presented for final arguments through video conferencing on date 30-70-2025. On call, his representative C.A. Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complaina

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Mohd. Shakeel Ahmad v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/10/133311/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent

The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, on behalf of the complainant, learned advocate Shri Harpreet Arora appeared. On behalf of the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Punit Jain appeared. The learned advocate for the opposite company has requested time to uploa

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Dr Chitra v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/10/101281/2022 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. When the matter was called, the complainant's learned advocate Shri Viren appeared for the complainant, and Shri Puneet Jain, learned advocate, appeared for the respondent. The complainant's learned advocate informed that the order passed under Section 34

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Dr Chitra v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/10/101281/2022 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

(Member), UP Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Dr Chitra v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/10/101281/2022 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Hearing Bench-II 26. Complaint No.: NCR45/40/028/2022 Dr. Chitra vs. Rise Projects Pvt. Ltd. Date: 47/04/2023 The complainant's case under Section 34 was presented through video [?]. When the matter was called, the complainant [?] was p

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Dr Chitra v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/10/101281/2022 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Hearing Bench-II 48. Complaint No.: NCRI45/0/0I28i/2022 Dr. Chitra vs. Rise Projects Pvt. Ltd. Date: 04/07/2023 The complainant's case under Section 34 was presented through video conferencing. When the matter was called, the complainan

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Shilpi Singhal and Sandeep Singhal v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/08/111676/2023 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, Ms. Jyoti, learned advocate, appeared on behalf of the complainant. Shri Puneet Jain, learned advocate, appeared on behalf of the opposite party. The arguments of both parties were heard in detail. File reserved for orders. HA

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Shilpi Singhal and Sandeep Singhal v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/08/111676/2023 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

UP Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Hearing [?] 45. Complaint No.: NCRI45/08/I676/2023 Shilpi Singhal and Sandeep Singhal vs. Rise Projects Private Limited Date: 44/42/2023 The complainant's case under Section 34 was presented through video [?]. When the matter was called, both part

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Sumit Kapoor v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/07/121052/2024 · Bench 2 · for the respondent

The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. When the matter was called, the complainant was represented by its representative, C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal, and Shri Puneet Jain, learned advocate, appeared for the respondent. The respondent is directed to upload its written reply to the complaint in ques

Undated·Execution order·Appeared·Verified

Suresh Chand Sharma v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/07/111181/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The subject case was presented for hearing under Sections 36, 40 and 63 on 2.07.2025, 40.44.2025, 47.03.2026 and 43.07.2026. Learned advocate Ms. Jyoti appeared for the complainant, and learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for the opposite party. After hearing the arguments of both parties, the file was reserved

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Suresh Chand Sharma v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/07/111181/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. When the matter was called, Ms. Jyoti, learned advocate, appeared for the complainant. Shri Puneet Jain, learned advocate, appeared for the respondent. The complainant's learned advocate informed that the order passed under Section 34 has not yet been com

Undated·Hearing order·Appeared·Verified

Kalpana Sharma and Dineshchand Sharma v. Rise Projects Pvt Ltd

Complaint No. NCR145/07/111151/2023 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent

U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddh Nagar Hearing Bench-2 44-Complaint No.: NCRI45/07/I452/2023 Kalpana Sharma and Dinesh Chand Sharma Vs. Rise Projects Private Limited Date: 4/42/2023 The complainant's case was presented under [?] through video conferencing [?]. On being called, both p