⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,621–7,628 · Page 382 of 382
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 101 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 852
Appellants were working on daily wage basis. At the threat of removal, they approached the Labour Court. A E compromise was entered into between the parties in terms of which the respondent-management agreed to reinstate the appellants. The Labour Court passed award in terms of the compromise. F The appellants were lat…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 100 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 845
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,621–7,628 · Page 382 of 382
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 101 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 852
Appellants were working on daily wage basis. At the threat of removal, they approached the Labour Court. A E compromise was entered into between the parties in terms of which the respondent-management agreed to reinstate the appellants. The Labour Court passed award in terms of the compromise. F The appellants were lat…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 100 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 845
845 H 846 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010) 2 S.C.R. A Sanjiv Sen, Prashant Kumar, Anuja Chopra for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was delivered ORDER B T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. In this petition for special leave to appeal the petitioners call in question the correctness of an order dated 20th July, 2009 passed by a Divi…
Supreme Court of India2010
(2010) 8 SCC 249
Answers in Section 313 can be taken into consideration but cannot form the sole basis of conviction without substantive prosecution evidence.
Supreme Court of India2010
(2010) 11 SCC 441
Presumption under Section 139 includes existence of legally enforceable debt; reverse burden of proof shifts to accused on standard of preponderance of probabilities.
Supreme Court of India2010Cited by 1
(2010) 7 SCC 667
Expressed concern over mechanical implication of distant relatives in matrimonial disputes under Section 498A without specific allegations of cruelty.
Supreme Court of India2010
(2010) 14 SCC 496
Formulated comprehensive 8-point checklist of factors to be considered while granting regular bail under Section 439.
Supreme Court of India2010
(2010) 10 SCC 643
Where there are multiple inconsistent dying declarations, rule of prudence requires corroboration; court must look into surrounding circumstances.
Supreme Court of India2010
(2010) 9 SCC 1
Enunciated comprehensive 10-point guideline for appreciation and evidentiary reliability of dying declarations under Section 32(1). | Ten-point guidelines for evaluating dying declarations applied to Section 26 BSA.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
845 H 846 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010) 2 S.C.R. A Sanjiv Sen, Prashant Kumar, Anuja Chopra for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was delivered ORDER B T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. In this petition for special leave to appeal the petitioners call in question the correctness of an order dated 20th July, 2009 passed by a Divi…
Supreme Court of India2010
(2010) 8 SCC 249
Answers in Section 313 can be taken into consideration but cannot form the sole basis of conviction without substantive prosecution evidence.
Supreme Court of India2010
(2010) 11 SCC 441
Presumption under Section 139 includes existence of legally enforceable debt; reverse burden of proof shifts to accused on standard of preponderance of probabilities.
Supreme Court of India2010Cited by 1
(2010) 7 SCC 667
Expressed concern over mechanical implication of distant relatives in matrimonial disputes under Section 498A without specific allegations of cruelty.
Supreme Court of India2010
(2010) 14 SCC 496
Formulated comprehensive 8-point checklist of factors to be considered while granting regular bail under Section 439.
Supreme Court of India2010
(2010) 10 SCC 643
Where there are multiple inconsistent dying declarations, rule of prudence requires corroboration; court must look into surrounding circumstances.
Supreme Court of India2010
(2010) 9 SCC 1
Enunciated comprehensive 10-point guideline for appreciation and evidentiary reliability of dying declarations under Section 32(1). | Ten-point guidelines for evaluating dying declarations applied to Section 26 BSA.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis