Supreme Court of India
Lakhan v. State of M.P.
(2010) 10 SCC 643
- Decision date
- 2010
- Text availability
- Summary or case record only
- Bench
- 2-Judge Bench
Source: landmark_precedents seed
Principle
Where there are multiple inconsistent dying declarations, rule of prudence requires corroboration; court must look into surrounding circumstances.
Connected provisions and cases
Related judgments
- Atbir v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi · (2010) 9 SCC 1 · 2010 · 1 shared provision
- Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay · AIR 1958 SC 22 · 1957 · 1 shared provision
- Pakala Narayana Swami v. King Emperor · AIR 1939 PC 47 · 1939 · 1 shared provision
Judgment text
Full judgment text is not available in this record.