Law on Tips(LOTS)India's Premier Legal News

⌘K

Home
The Bar Room
The Gazette
The Library
Legal League
Judgments
Careers

⚖

Loading…

Law on Tips.

A free Indian legal platform. Bringing you the latest judgments, legislative updates, and in-depth legal analysis from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and Tribunals.

Explore

The Bar Room
The Gazette
The Library
Compare Acts
Legal League
Judgments
Careers

Trust & Standards

About Us
Editorial Policy
Fact-Checking
Corrections
Methodology
Ownership
Masthead
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact

Subscribe

Get the latest legal news delivered to your inbox daily.

Bar News Acts League

Login

Rangappa v. Sri Mohan | Judgment | Law on Tips

Judgment Library/Case record

Supreme Court of India

Rangappa v. Sri Mohan

(2010) 11 SCC 441

Decision date: 2010
Text availability: Summary or case record only
Bench: 3-Judge Bench

Source: landmark_precedents seed

Case summary

Presumption under Section 139 includes existence of legally enforceable debt; reverse burden of proof shifts to accused on standard of preponderance of probabilities.

Principle

Presumption under Section 139 includes existence of legally enforceable debt; reverse burden of proof shifts to accused on standard of preponderance of probabilities.

Connected provisions and cases

interpretsThe Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 · Section 139 Other decisions on this provision →

Related judgments

Kalamani Tex v. P. Balasubramanian · (2021) 5 SCC 283 · 2021 · 1 shared provision
Basalingappa v. Mudibasappa · (2019) 5 SCC 418 · 2019 · 1 shared provision
Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar · (2019) 4 SCC 197 · 2019 · 1 shared provision

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.

Judgment Library/Case record

Supreme Court of India

Rangappa v. Sri Mohan

(2010) 11 SCC 441

Decision date: 2010
Text availability: Summary or case record only
Bench: 3-Judge Bench

Source: landmark_precedents seed

Case summary

Presumption under Section 139 includes existence of legally enforceable debt; reverse burden of proof shifts to accused on standard of preponderance of probabilities.

Principle

Presumption under Section 139 includes existence of legally enforceable debt; reverse burden of proof shifts to accused on standard of preponderance of probabilities.

Connected provisions and cases

interpretsThe Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 · Section 139 Other decisions on this provision →

Related judgments

Kalamani Tex v. P. Balasubramanian · (2021) 5 SCC 283 · 2021 · 1 shared provision
Basalingappa v. Mudibasappa · (2019) 5 SCC 418 · 2019 · 1 shared provision
Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar · (2019) 4 SCC 197 · 2019 · 1 shared provision

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.