⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,341–5,360 · Page 268 of 382
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 470 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 654
654H STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. INDIAN HOTEL & 655 RESTAURANTS ASSN. CONSTITUTION OF IND/A, 1950: A Art. 19(1)(g) read with Art. 14 - Prohibition on dance -s.33-A of Bombay Police Act prohibiting dance of any kind of type in any eating house, permit room or bear bar - Held: State has failed to establish that the restricti…
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2013Full text
2013 INSC 47 · [2013] 3 S.C.R. 27
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,341–5,360 · Page 268 of 382
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 470 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 654
654H STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. INDIAN HOTEL & 655 RESTAURANTS ASSN. CONSTITUTION OF IND/A, 1950: A Art. 19(1)(g) read with Art. 14 - Prohibition on dance -s.33-A of Bombay Police Act prohibiting dance of any kind of type in any eating house, permit room or bear bar - Held: State has failed to establish that the restricti…
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2013Full text
2013 INSC 47 · [2013] 3 S.C.R. 27
Allowing the appeal, the Court c HELD: 1.1. Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 imposes a limitation period of six months within which the concerned authorities must commence action against an importer/assessee in case of duties not levied, short- D levied or erroneously refunded. It allows the said limitation period t…
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 469 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 646
A charge-sheet against the appellants and others for G offences punishable u/ss 420, 468, 471 and 477-A read with s.120-B IPC, was filed in the Court of Addi. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. One of the accused turned approver and the ·Magistrate by order dated 10.9.2008, granted him pardon and committed the case to the …
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 468 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 421
Hence the present appeal. F Appellant contended that while permitting withdrawal of the appeal, such observations could not have been made by the High Court; and that upon final disposal of the case, the High Court become functus officio and hence could n~t have extended the inerim relief beyond G the date of judgment.…
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 467 · [2013] 17 S.C.R. 596
- If can be _automatically applied to the question of the legality of the execution of the preventive detention orders where there is a considerable time gap between the passing of the order of preventive detention and its execution - Whether the D proposed detenues who absconded or evaded the execution of the detentio…
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 466 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 897
2009 (12) SCR 38 relied on Para 8 E 2008 (2) SCR 775 distinguished Para 7 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 5475 of 2013. From the Judgment and Order dated 04.05.2011 of the F High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RSA No. 1992 of 2011. L. Nageshwar Rao, Mishra Saurabh for the Appellant. Satind…
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 465 · [2013] 10 S.C.R. 706
708 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013) 10 S.C.R. A Australia and in this way the domicile of India got revived. The order passed by the High Court was challenged before this Court. Dismissing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1. From a plain reading of Section 1(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, it is evident that it has extra…
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 464 · [2013] 17 S.C.R. 583
" [2013] 17 S.C.R. 583 KACHCHH JAL SANKAT NIVARAN SAMITI & ORS. A v. STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 2957 of 2013) JULY 15, 2013 B [CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD AND V. GOPALA GOWDA, JJ.] Judicial Review - Of policy decision - Scope of - Held: · Court has very limited jurisdiction to interfere with policy C decisio…
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 463 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 547
H BHAGWATI DEVELOPERS PVT.·LTD. v. PEERLESS GEN. 549 FINANCE & INVEST. CO. LTD. Dismissing the appeal, the Court A HELD: 1.1 Section 13 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 lays down that contract in relation to securities in notified areas is illegal if made otherwise than between the members of recogniz…
Supreme Court of India12 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 462 · [2013] 13 S.C.R. 820
~ F Doctrine - Doctrine of 'Lifting of corporate veil' -Applicability of, in cases of violation of provisions of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. Interpretation of Statutes - 'Heading' of a provision - As - an aid to interpretation of the provision - Held: Heading of a '1--~G section can be regarded as a key to the int…
Supreme Court of India12 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 461 · [2013] 13 S.C.R. 884
l\t'AHINDER KUMAR v. HIGH COURT OF M.P. THR. REG. 885 GEN. ,y Nyayik Seva (Bharti Tatha Seva Sharten) Niyam, 1994 - r. 7 A (as amended by Madhya Pradesh Rajpatra (ASADHARAN) dated 08.06.2005). Selection made by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh of the third respondent for the post of entry level B District Judge in the …
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 460 · [2013] 17 S.C.R. 947
The appellants participated in the process of selection for appointment to the post of police constables S.C.T.P.C. (Civil) (Men). As there was inordinate delay in F the announcement of results of the written examination, they along with many others staged a dharna in front of the District Police Office on 17,4.2010. T…
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2013Full text
2013 INSC 46 · [2013] 3 S.C.R. 1129
E Licence in respect of IMFL 'ON' shop, was granted in favour of the appellants in C.A.No.615 of 2013. Respondent No.1 filed writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution, challenging the grant of the licence. High Court entertained the writ petition and quashed the grant . F of exclusive privilege and the licence, …
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 459 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 77
Narendra Hooda, Sr. AAG, Dr. Monika Gusain for ihe Respondents. F The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER 1. Leave granted. G 2. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 26.11.2009 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter ~ referred to…
Supreme Court of India10 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 458 · [2013] 13 S.C.R. 764
[2013] 13 S.C.R. 764 A JITENDRA SINGH @ BABBOO SINGH & ANR. f v. STATE OF U.P. (Criminal Appeal No. 763 of 2003) JULY 10, 2013 B [T.S. THAKUR AND MADAN B. LOKUR, JJ.] Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000: c ss. 2(k), 7A and 20 - Prosecution of accused u/ss. 147, 302, 3048 and 498A /PC - During t…
Supreme Court of India10 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 457 · [2013] 10 S.C.R. 1163
· Paras Kuhad Siddharth Luthra, ASG, F.S. Nariman, Harish Chander, Ml.J_~UI Gupta, Subhash Sharma, Lily Thomas F (Petitioner-ln~Person), Meenakshi Arora, Amit Pawan, Rajiv Kumar Sinha, S. Chandra Shekhar, Satya Narain, Shukla (Petitioner-In-Person), Saurabh Suman Sinha, Shilpa Singh, Kamini Jaiswal, Abhimanue Shrestha,…
Supreme Court of India10 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 456 · [2013] 10 S.C.R. 1130
LILY THOMAS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 1131 he files the appeal or revision against the conviction and /or A sentence - Constitution of India, 1950 - Arts. 101 (3)(a), 102(1)(e), 190(3)(a) and 191(1)(e). In exercise of power conferred under Article 102(1)(e) and under Article 191(1)(e) of the Constitution, the 8 Parliame…
Supreme Court of India9 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 455 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 74
Kiran Suri, Nakibur Rahman Barbhuiya, Ritika Gambhir, Kirti Renu Mishra for the Appellant. H 74 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. BALKAR RAM & 75 ORS. Ashok Mathur, Varinder Kumar Sharma for the A Respondets. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER B 1. This appeal has been preferred by way of special leave a…
Supreme Court of India9 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 454 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 66
P. NAGESH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA 67 the order of conviction recorded by the trial court based A on the circumstantial evidence. This Court issued notice to the respondent limited to the question as to whether the matter can be remitted back to the High Court for fresh disposal in accordance B with law. Disposing of the …
Supreme Court of India9 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 453 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 519
1.4 Therefore, keeping the investigation pending will be futile as the respondent including Directorate for the G State Literacy Programme is not s…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Allowing the appeal, the Court c HELD: 1.1. Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 imposes a limitation period of six months within which the concerned authorities must commence action against an importer/assessee in case of duties not levied, short- D levied or erroneously refunded. It allows the said limitation period t…
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 469 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 646
A charge-sheet against the appellants and others for G offences punishable u/ss 420, 468, 471 and 477-A read with s.120-B IPC, was filed in the Court of Addi. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. One of the accused turned approver and the ·Magistrate by order dated 10.9.2008, granted him pardon and committed the case to the …
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 468 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 421
Hence the present appeal. F Appellant contended that while permitting withdrawal of the appeal, such observations could not have been made by the High Court; and that upon final disposal of the case, the High Court become functus officio and hence could n~t have extended the inerim relief beyond G the date of judgment.…
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 467 · [2013] 17 S.C.R. 596
- If can be _automatically applied to the question of the legality of the execution of the preventive detention orders where there is a considerable time gap between the passing of the order of preventive detention and its execution - Whether the D proposed detenues who absconded or evaded the execution of the detentio…
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 466 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 897
2009 (12) SCR 38 relied on Para 8 E 2008 (2) SCR 775 distinguished Para 7 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 5475 of 2013. From the Judgment and Order dated 04.05.2011 of the F High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RSA No. 1992 of 2011. L. Nageshwar Rao, Mishra Saurabh for the Appellant. Satind…
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 465 · [2013] 10 S.C.R. 706
708 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013) 10 S.C.R. A Australia and in this way the domicile of India got revived. The order passed by the High Court was challenged before this Court. Dismissing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1. From a plain reading of Section 1(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, it is evident that it has extra…
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 464 · [2013] 17 S.C.R. 583
" [2013] 17 S.C.R. 583 KACHCHH JAL SANKAT NIVARAN SAMITI & ORS. A v. STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 2957 of 2013) JULY 15, 2013 B [CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD AND V. GOPALA GOWDA, JJ.] Judicial Review - Of policy decision - Scope of - Held: · Court has very limited jurisdiction to interfere with policy C decisio…
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 463 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 547
H BHAGWATI DEVELOPERS PVT.·LTD. v. PEERLESS GEN. 549 FINANCE & INVEST. CO. LTD. Dismissing the appeal, the Court A HELD: 1.1 Section 13 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 lays down that contract in relation to securities in notified areas is illegal if made otherwise than between the members of recogniz…
Supreme Court of India12 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 462 · [2013] 13 S.C.R. 820
~ F Doctrine - Doctrine of 'Lifting of corporate veil' -Applicability of, in cases of violation of provisions of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. Interpretation of Statutes - 'Heading' of a provision - As - an aid to interpretation of the provision - Held: Heading of a '1--~G section can be regarded as a key to the int…
Supreme Court of India12 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 461 · [2013] 13 S.C.R. 884
l\t'AHINDER KUMAR v. HIGH COURT OF M.P. THR. REG. 885 GEN. ,y Nyayik Seva (Bharti Tatha Seva Sharten) Niyam, 1994 - r. 7 A (as amended by Madhya Pradesh Rajpatra (ASADHARAN) dated 08.06.2005). Selection made by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh of the third respondent for the post of entry level B District Judge in the …
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 460 · [2013] 17 S.C.R. 947
The appellants participated in the process of selection for appointment to the post of police constables S.C.T.P.C. (Civil) (Men). As there was inordinate delay in F the announcement of results of the written examination, they along with many others staged a dharna in front of the District Police Office on 17,4.2010. T…
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2013Full text
2013 INSC 46 · [2013] 3 S.C.R. 1129
E Licence in respect of IMFL 'ON' shop, was granted in favour of the appellants in C.A.No.615 of 2013. Respondent No.1 filed writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution, challenging the grant of the licence. High Court entertained the writ petition and quashed the grant . F of exclusive privilege and the licence, …
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 459 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 77
Narendra Hooda, Sr. AAG, Dr. Monika Gusain for ihe Respondents. F The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER 1. Leave granted. G 2. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 26.11.2009 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter ~ referred to…
Supreme Court of India10 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 458 · [2013] 13 S.C.R. 764
[2013] 13 S.C.R. 764 A JITENDRA SINGH @ BABBOO SINGH & ANR. f v. STATE OF U.P. (Criminal Appeal No. 763 of 2003) JULY 10, 2013 B [T.S. THAKUR AND MADAN B. LOKUR, JJ.] Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000: c ss. 2(k), 7A and 20 - Prosecution of accused u/ss. 147, 302, 3048 and 498A /PC - During t…
Supreme Court of India10 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 457 · [2013] 10 S.C.R. 1163
· Paras Kuhad Siddharth Luthra, ASG, F.S. Nariman, Harish Chander, Ml.J_~UI Gupta, Subhash Sharma, Lily Thomas F (Petitioner-ln~Person), Meenakshi Arora, Amit Pawan, Rajiv Kumar Sinha, S. Chandra Shekhar, Satya Narain, Shukla (Petitioner-In-Person), Saurabh Suman Sinha, Shilpa Singh, Kamini Jaiswal, Abhimanue Shrestha,…
Supreme Court of India10 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 456 · [2013] 10 S.C.R. 1130
LILY THOMAS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 1131 he files the appeal or revision against the conviction and /or A sentence - Constitution of India, 1950 - Arts. 101 (3)(a), 102(1)(e), 190(3)(a) and 191(1)(e). In exercise of power conferred under Article 102(1)(e) and under Article 191(1)(e) of the Constitution, the 8 Parliame…
Supreme Court of India9 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 455 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 74
Kiran Suri, Nakibur Rahman Barbhuiya, Ritika Gambhir, Kirti Renu Mishra for the Appellant. H 74 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. BALKAR RAM & 75 ORS. Ashok Mathur, Varinder Kumar Sharma for the A Respondets. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER B 1. This appeal has been preferred by way of special leave a…
Supreme Court of India9 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 454 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 66
P. NAGESH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA 67 the order of conviction recorded by the trial court based A on the circumstantial evidence. This Court issued notice to the respondent limited to the question as to whether the matter can be remitted back to the High Court for fresh disposal in accordance B with law. Disposing of the …
Supreme Court of India9 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 453 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 519
1.4 Therefore, keeping the investigation pending will be futile as the respondent including Directorate for the G State Literacy Programme is not s…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis