⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
161–180 · Page 9 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
EX.P./1825/2026
2. Careful perusal of aforesaid order/judgment, sought to be executed in the present proceedings, reveals that Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, while disposing of the writ petition filed by the petitioners, directed 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 respondent No.2-Direct…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15128/2026
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
161–180 · Page 9 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
EX.P./1825/2026
2. Careful perusal of aforesaid order/judgment, sought to be executed in the present proceedings, reveals that Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, while disposing of the writ petition filed by the petitioners, directed 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 respondent No.2-Direct…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15128/2026
4. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted to them at this stage. This writ petition, therefore, is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No. 205 of 2025 and in terms the…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37192 · CRMPM/1070/2026
2026:HHC:37192 purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner in custody. The petitioner would abide by the terms and conditions that the Court may impose. Hence, it was prayed that the present petition be allowed and the petitioner be released on bail. 3. The petition is opposed by filing a status report assertin…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15012/2026
3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the respective 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. …
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37352 · COPC/987/2026
- 2 - 2026:HHC:37352 four weeks with further direction that in case the petitioners are found to be similarly situated to the petitioners in the aforesaid judgment they would be extended similar benefits, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and by passing a speaking orders thereon. 2. Heard. 3.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37541 · CR.A/409/2009
(Nirmala Devi): Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent/State: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) The instant appeals, being offshoots of a judgment of conviction and orde…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15061/2026
not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/ competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learn…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15210/2026
area whereas he has already served at GSSS Gaunth, District Shimla, from 23.08.2012 to 31.10.2015, which was also a difficult sub-cadre area. Therefore, the petitioner could not have been transferred to a difficult sub-cadre area again in violation of Clause 12 of the applicable transfer policy. 3. Keeping in view the …
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/14979/2026
(ii). That petitioner may be granted the increment as already granted by the respondent at the time of pay fixation during promotion in the year 2018, but stopped as per Director Elementary Education No. (CTE)-IV-(6)-U.S. (2020) EDN-H dated 20.01.2022, Para 3, the pay scale of JBT and HT are the same at 1 Whether repor…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/14895/2026
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 2056 of 2023 decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024 2 3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted to him at this stage. This writ petition, therefore, is dis…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/14919/2026
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 2056 of 2023 decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024 2 3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted to her at this stage. This writ petition, therefore, is dis…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:36908 · COPC/1219/2026
2026:HHC:36908 2 [Annexure P-3 (colly)] annexed with the writ petition, in the light of the averments made therein, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of passing of said order, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. 4. With the consent of Learned Counsels, this Court disposes of the instant con…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/14917/2026
representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent au…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37386 · CWPOA/2026/2019
2026:HHC:37386 2 Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Since common questions of law and facts are involved in all these petitions, they are being taken up together for final disposal. 2. For the purpose of deciding the issue, the facts of CWPOA No.1549 of 2019 are taken up. 3. The petitioners, who were having the requisite …
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:36905 · RFA/20/2017
3. The facts giving to the instant appeals are that the petitioners laid challenge to Award No. 33, dated 20.12.2006, passed by Land Acquisition Collector, HPPWD, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P.. It was averred by the petitioners that Government of Himachal Pradesh issued notification dated 19.09.2004, under Section 4 of t…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/14893/2026
Chand versus The Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla and others alongwith connected matters, in which, the respondents were directed to pay the retiral benefits to the petitioners within a period of six months. In case, the required retiral benefits are not paid to the petitioners within the aforesaid period of…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CMP/19564/2026
Shri Ram General Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Kala Devi & others. FAO(MVA) No.280 of 2024 01.09.2026 Present: Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Advocate, for respondents No.5 & 7. Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent …
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15212/2026
petitioner has completed her normal tenure at GMS Sandyar. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the petitioner had undergone a major spinal cord surgery in the recent past and on that account, it will be difficult for her to travel such a long distance and will in turn create domestic problems for …
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
OMPM/311/2026
Earlier also, due to the inefficiency and lackadaisical attitude of the law firm/counsel, cases were withdrawn from the said law firm, namely, M/s M.V. Kini & Co., vide letters dated 20.09.2023 and 26.03.2024. It is stated that the applicant was under the bona fide belief that the instant case was pending. It came to t…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/5163/2025
CWP No.8903 of 2022 De-linked from CWP No.5163 of 2025. A perusal of the order dated 18.09.2024, would go on to show that the Comptroller and Audit General of India was directed to have an audit of the utilized funds by respondents No.5 and 6 for the period from 2015 to 2019 and submit a report to this Court. Communica…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
4. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted to them at this stage. This writ petition, therefore, is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No. 205 of 2025 and in terms the…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37192 · CRMPM/1070/2026
2026:HHC:37192 purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner in custody. The petitioner would abide by the terms and conditions that the Court may impose. Hence, it was prayed that the present petition be allowed and the petitioner be released on bail. 3. The petition is opposed by filing a status report assertin…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15012/2026
3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the respective 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. …
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37352 · COPC/987/2026
- 2 - 2026:HHC:37352 four weeks with further direction that in case the petitioners are found to be similarly situated to the petitioners in the aforesaid judgment they would be extended similar benefits, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and by passing a speaking orders thereon. 2. Heard. 3.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37541 · CR.A/409/2009
(Nirmala Devi): Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent/State: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) The instant appeals, being offshoots of a judgment of conviction and orde…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15061/2026
not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/ competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learn…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15210/2026
area whereas he has already served at GSSS Gaunth, District Shimla, from 23.08.2012 to 31.10.2015, which was also a difficult sub-cadre area. Therefore, the petitioner could not have been transferred to a difficult sub-cadre area again in violation of Clause 12 of the applicable transfer policy. 3. Keeping in view the …
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/14979/2026
(ii). That petitioner may be granted the increment as already granted by the respondent at the time of pay fixation during promotion in the year 2018, but stopped as per Director Elementary Education No. (CTE)-IV-(6)-U.S. (2020) EDN-H dated 20.01.2022, Para 3, the pay scale of JBT and HT are the same at 1 Whether repor…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/14895/2026
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 2056 of 2023 decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024 2 3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted to him at this stage. This writ petition, therefore, is dis…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/14919/2026
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 2056 of 2023 decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024 2 3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted to her at this stage. This writ petition, therefore, is dis…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:36908 · COPC/1219/2026
2026:HHC:36908 2 [Annexure P-3 (colly)] annexed with the writ petition, in the light of the averments made therein, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of passing of said order, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. 4. With the consent of Learned Counsels, this Court disposes of the instant con…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/14917/2026
representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent au…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37386 · CWPOA/2026/2019
2026:HHC:37386 2 Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Since common questions of law and facts are involved in all these petitions, they are being taken up together for final disposal. 2. For the purpose of deciding the issue, the facts of CWPOA No.1549 of 2019 are taken up. 3. The petitioners, who were having the requisite …
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:36905 · RFA/20/2017
3. The facts giving to the instant appeals are that the petitioners laid challenge to Award No. 33, dated 20.12.2006, passed by Land Acquisition Collector, HPPWD, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P.. It was averred by the petitioners that Government of Himachal Pradesh issued notification dated 19.09.2004, under Section 4 of t…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/14893/2026
Chand versus The Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla and others alongwith connected matters, in which, the respondents were directed to pay the retiral benefits to the petitioners within a period of six months. In case, the required retiral benefits are not paid to the petitioners within the aforesaid period of…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CMP/19564/2026
Shri Ram General Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Kala Devi & others. FAO(MVA) No.280 of 2024 01.09.2026 Present: Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Advocate, for respondents No.5 & 7. Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent …
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15212/2026
petitioner has completed her normal tenure at GMS Sandyar. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the petitioner had undergone a major spinal cord surgery in the recent past and on that account, it will be difficult for her to travel such a long distance and will in turn create domestic problems for …
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
OMPM/311/2026
Earlier also, due to the inefficiency and lackadaisical attitude of the law firm/counsel, cases were withdrawn from the said law firm, namely, M/s M.V. Kini & Co., vide letters dated 20.09.2023 and 26.03.2024. It is stated that the applicant was under the bona fide belief that the instant case was pending. It came to t…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/5163/2025
CWP No.8903 of 2022 De-linked from CWP No.5163 of 2025. A perusal of the order dated 18.09.2024, would go on to show that the Comptroller and Audit General of India was directed to have an audit of the utilized funds by respondents No.5 and 6 for the period from 2015 to 2019 and submit a report to this Court. Communica…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis