IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 15128 of 2026. Decided on : 2nd September, 2026 Prem Lamo ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Aditya Singh Thakur, Advocate, Proxy Counsel. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks applicability of Ghanshyam Dass and Ors Vs. State of H.P. and Ors.2. 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General has apprised that aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No. 205 of 2025 and other connected matters. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2CWP No. 2056 of 2023 decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024 2 4. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted to them at this stage. This writ petition, therefore, is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No. 205 of 2025 and in terms thereof. 5. With the above observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua) Judge 2nd September, 2026. (jai)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 15128 of 2026. Decided on : 2nd September, 2026 Prem Lamo ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Aditya Singh Thakur, Advocate, Proxy Counsel. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks applicability of Ghanshyam Dass and Ors Vs. State of H.P. and Ors.2. 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General has apprised that aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No. 205 of 2025 and other connected matters. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2CWP No. 2056 of 2023 decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024 2 4. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted to them at this stage. This writ petition, therefore, is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No. 205 of 2025 and in terms thereof. 5. With the above observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua) Judge 2nd September, 2026. (jai)