2026:HHC:36908 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1219 of 2026 IN CWP No.1285 of 2026 Decided on: 01.09.2026 __________________________________________________________ Porkhi Ram and others .....Petitioners Versus Dr. Abhishek Jain (IAS) and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Ravi Tegta, Advocate vice Mr. K.S. Gill, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Heard. 2. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. Petitioners have invoked contempt jurisdiction of this Court, alleging non-compliance of judgment dated 02.03.2026, titled as Porkhi Ram and others Versus State of HP and others, whereby, the respondents were directed to decide the representation 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2026:HHC:36908 2 [Annexure P-3 (colly)] annexed with the writ petition, in the light of the averments made therein, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of passing of said order, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law.

4. With the consent of Learned Counsels, this Court disposes of the instant contempt petition, with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to decide the representation in terms of the order/ judgment dated 02.03.2026, within a period of four weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in case, the said representation has not been decided as yet. 5. Needless to say that, in case, the representation stands already decided, the speaking order in terms of judgment dated 02.03.2026 shall be conveyed to the petitioners herein. In aforesaid terms, instant petition and all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September 01, 2026 [Bhardwaj]

2026:HHC:36908 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1219 of 2026 IN CWP No.1285 of 2026 Decided on: 01.09.2026 __________________________________________________________ Porkhi Ram and others .....Petitioners Versus Dr. Abhishek Jain (IAS) and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Ravi Tegta, Advocate vice Mr. K.S. Gill, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Heard. 2. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. Petitioners have invoked contempt jurisdiction of this Court, alleging non-compliance of judgment dated 02.03.2026, titled as Porkhi Ram and others Versus State of HP and others, whereby, the respondents were directed to decide the representation 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2026:HHC:36908 2 [Annexure P-3 (colly)] annexed with the writ petition, in the light of the averments made therein, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of passing of said order, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law.

4. With the consent of Learned Counsels, this Court disposes of the instant contempt petition, with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to decide the representation in terms of the order/ judgment dated 02.03.2026, within a period of four weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in case, the said representation has not been decided as yet. 5. Needless to say that, in case, the representation stands already decided, the speaking order in terms of judgment dated 02.03.2026 shall be conveyed to the petitioners herein. In aforesaid terms, instant petition and all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September 01, 2026 [Bhardwaj]