⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
101–120 · Page 6 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CMP.M/755/2026
CMP(M) No. 755 of 2026 Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that he has no objection in allowing the application. In view of this statement as well as the fact that there is no other legal heir of deceased appellant No.6-Kala Devi, except those mentioned in para 2 of the application, the present application is…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
101–120 · Page 6 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CMP.M/755/2026
CMP(M) No. 755 of 2026 Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that he has no objection in allowing the application. In view of this statement as well as the fact that there is no other legal heir of deceased appellant No.6-Kala Devi, except those mentioned in para 2 of the application, the present application is…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15624/2026
not been appended with the petitions. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law after incorporating appropriate pleadings. Granting such liberty, the present writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, a…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15521/2026
3. Reliance has been placed on the judgment passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 3050 of 2014, titled Nek Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.07.2014 and also on a subsequent order of this Court dated 25.08.2021, passed in CWP No. 4377 of 2021, titled Sh. Subhash Chand versus T…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CRMP/3700/2026
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 09, 2026 (Sunil)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38378 · CMPMO/463/2026
2 2026:HHC:38378 2. By way of order dated 25.4.2026, the learned trial Court, after affording ten effective opportunities to the plaintiffs, has closed the evidence of the plaintiffs. 3. For the sake of convenience, parties to the lis are hereinafter referred to, in the same manner, in which, they were referred to, by …
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15422/2026
Himachal Pradesh. The retirement gratuity has been revised to Rs. 20 lakhs with effect from 01.01.2016. Since the petitioner superannuated on 31.05.2018, he is also entitled to the revised gratuity ceiling limit of Rs. 20 lakhs, but respondents No. 4 & 5 have only released a sum of Rs. 10 lakhs. The balance amount of R…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38263 · COPC/995/2026
2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid office order dated 06.06.2026, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge Septemb…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15476/2026
3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners within six 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowe…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38138 · CWP/15445/2026
2026:HHC:38138 aggrieved against the aforesaid order and hence, instituted this writ petition. 2. Heard and considered the case file. 2(i). Procedure for issuing various certificates including the income certificate has been delineated in Chapter 28 of the Himachal Pradesh Land Records Manual. In terms of para 28.1 the…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15489/2026
representation within two weeks from today. In case, such representation is so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. 5. The instant petition is disposed of in ab…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
EX.P./1962/2026
2. Careful perusal of aforesaid order/judgment, sought to be executed in the present proceedings, reveals that Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, while disposing of the writ petition filed by the petitioner, directed the petitioner to file a detailed representation with regard to the issue raised in the writ petition to …
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/6583/2026
Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, qua the post of Lecturer/Post Graduate Teacher. 2. Learned Assistant Advocate General has placed on record office instructions from the Director School Education, relevant portion of which reads as under: -“In this regard it is submitted that after advertisement of Posts for Bench M…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CMP/22133/2026
The main appeal has been filed under the provisions of Motor Vehicles Act and strict rule of CPC are not applicable, as such, in order to update the record, the legal representatives of respondent No.5, Smt. Manohar Kaur, as mentioned in CMP(M) No.1531 of 2017, are ordered to be brought on record as respondent No.5(a) …
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38354 · CR/49/2025
learned counsel for the petitioner at the Bar, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 09th September, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
EX.P./1916/2026
Judge September 09, 2026 (sunil) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38291 · FAO/88/2015
2 2026:HHC:38291 present appeal is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Send down the record. (Virender Singh) Judge 09th September, 2026 (Pramod Kumar)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38925 · ARB.C/187/2026
exercising the powers of Arbitrator under Section 3 of the National Highways Act, 1956. 2 The arbitral dispute has arisen out of the land acquired in District Kullu, H.P. for the purpose of construction of the National Highway, land for which has been acquired under the provisions of National Highways Act, 1956. 3 Feel…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38261 · COPC/1082/2026
2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid office order dated 13.08.2026, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge Septemb…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CRMPM/1744/2026
2 2. As per the report of the Registry, the present petition is barred by 336 days. 3. A perusal of the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act demonstrates that the following reasons stand assigned therein to justify the delay in filing of the petition:- “That the applicant/petitioner is a private driv…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Sep 2026Full text
ARB.C/180/2026
-2- Highways Act, 1956 and for which, compensation was awarded vide award dated 24.05.2018 by the Competent Authority. 3. Feeling aggrieved by the award passed by the competent authority, the petitioners preferred Arbitration Case 138 of 2023 before the learned Arbitrator under National Highways Authority of India-cum-…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
CWP/15624/2026
not been appended with the petitions. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law after incorporating appropriate pleadings. Granting such liberty, the present writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, a…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15521/2026
3. Reliance has been placed on the judgment passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 3050 of 2014, titled Nek Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.07.2014 and also on a subsequent order of this Court dated 25.08.2021, passed in CWP No. 4377 of 2021, titled Sh. Subhash Chand versus T…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CRMP/3700/2026
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 09, 2026 (Sunil)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38378 · CMPMO/463/2026
2 2026:HHC:38378 2. By way of order dated 25.4.2026, the learned trial Court, after affording ten effective opportunities to the plaintiffs, has closed the evidence of the plaintiffs. 3. For the sake of convenience, parties to the lis are hereinafter referred to, in the same manner, in which, they were referred to, by …
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15422/2026
Himachal Pradesh. The retirement gratuity has been revised to Rs. 20 lakhs with effect from 01.01.2016. Since the petitioner superannuated on 31.05.2018, he is also entitled to the revised gratuity ceiling limit of Rs. 20 lakhs, but respondents No. 4 & 5 have only released a sum of Rs. 10 lakhs. The balance amount of R…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38263 · COPC/995/2026
2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid office order dated 06.06.2026, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge Septemb…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15476/2026
3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners within six 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowe…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38138 · CWP/15445/2026
2026:HHC:38138 aggrieved against the aforesaid order and hence, instituted this writ petition. 2. Heard and considered the case file. 2(i). Procedure for issuing various certificates including the income certificate has been delineated in Chapter 28 of the Himachal Pradesh Land Records Manual. In terms of para 28.1 the…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15489/2026
representation within two weeks from today. In case, such representation is so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. 5. The instant petition is disposed of in ab…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
EX.P./1962/2026
2. Careful perusal of aforesaid order/judgment, sought to be executed in the present proceedings, reveals that Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, while disposing of the writ petition filed by the petitioner, directed the petitioner to file a detailed representation with regard to the issue raised in the writ petition to …
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/6583/2026
Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, qua the post of Lecturer/Post Graduate Teacher. 2. Learned Assistant Advocate General has placed on record office instructions from the Director School Education, relevant portion of which reads as under: -“In this regard it is submitted that after advertisement of Posts for Bench M…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CMP/22133/2026
The main appeal has been filed under the provisions of Motor Vehicles Act and strict rule of CPC are not applicable, as such, in order to update the record, the legal representatives of respondent No.5, Smt. Manohar Kaur, as mentioned in CMP(M) No.1531 of 2017, are ordered to be brought on record as respondent No.5(a) …
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38354 · CR/49/2025
learned counsel for the petitioner at the Bar, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 09th September, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
EX.P./1916/2026
Judge September 09, 2026 (sunil) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38291 · FAO/88/2015
2 2026:HHC:38291 present appeal is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Send down the record. (Virender Singh) Judge 09th September, 2026 (Pramod Kumar)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38925 · ARB.C/187/2026
exercising the powers of Arbitrator under Section 3 of the National Highways Act, 1956. 2 The arbitral dispute has arisen out of the land acquired in District Kullu, H.P. for the purpose of construction of the National Highway, land for which has been acquired under the provisions of National Highways Act, 1956. 3 Feel…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38261 · COPC/1082/2026
2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid office order dated 13.08.2026, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge Septemb…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Sep 2026Full text
CRMPM/1744/2026
2 2. As per the report of the Registry, the present petition is barred by 336 days. 3. A perusal of the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act demonstrates that the following reasons stand assigned therein to justify the delay in filing of the petition:- “That the applicant/petitioner is a private driv…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Sep 2026Full text
ARB.C/180/2026
-2- Highways Act, 1956 and for which, compensation was awarded vide award dated 24.05.2018 by the Competent Authority. 3. Feeling aggrieved by the award passed by the competent authority, the petitioners preferred Arbitration Case 138 of 2023 before the learned Arbitrator under National Highways Authority of India-cum-…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis