SARDEEP THAKUR Versus NAVDEEP CRMP-3700 of 2026 in CR.R - 332 of 2025 09.09.2026 Present: Mr. Parveen Kumar Chandel, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. H.R. Jhingta, Advocate, for the non-applicant/ respondent. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and further three days’ time, as prayed for, is granted to the applicant-petitioner to deposit compounding fee to the tune of Rs.5,000/- with HP State Legal Services Authority in terms of judgment dated 29.04.2026 passed by this court in Criminal Revision No. 332 of 2025. In case needful is not done within extended time, petitioner shall render himself liable for penal consequences as well as contempt of Court. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 09, 2026 (Sunil)

SARDEEP THAKUR Versus NAVDEEP CRMP-3700 of 2026 in CR.R - 332 of 2025 09.09.2026 Present: Mr. Parveen Kumar Chandel, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. H.R. Jhingta, Advocate, for the non-applicant/ respondent. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and further three days’ time, as prayed for, is granted to the applicant-petitioner to deposit compounding fee to the tune of Rs.5,000/- with HP State Legal Services Authority in terms of judgment dated 29.04.2026 passed by this court in Criminal Revision No. 332 of 2025. In case needful is not done within extended time, petitioner shall render himself liable for penal consequences as well as contempt of Court. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 09, 2026 (Sunil)