IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15620 of 2026 alongwith connected matters Decided on: 10th September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No.15620 of 2026 Shankar Sharma …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Transport Corporation .....Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No.15621 of 2026 Lalit Kumar …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Transport Corporation .....Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CWP No.15622 of 2026 Parvez Akther …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Transport Corporation .....Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. CWP No.15623 of 2026 Lekh Ram …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Transport Corporation .....Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2 5. CWP No.15624 of 2026 Rattan Singh …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Transport Corporation .....Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. CWP No.15625 of 2026 Kulwant Singh …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Transport Corporation .....Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Daleep Chand, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent in all the matters except CWP Nos.15622 and 15625 of 2026. Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent in CWP No.15622 of 2026. Mr. Abhishek Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent in CWP No.15625 of 2026. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are some defects in the pleadings as also in the relief clause of the writ petitions. Relevant documents have also 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 3 not been appended with the petitions. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law after incorporating appropriate pleadings. Granting such liberty, the present writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 10, 2026 Judge Mukesh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15620 of 2026 alongwith connected matters Decided on: 10th September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No.15620 of 2026 Shankar Sharma …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Transport Corporation .....Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No.15621 of 2026 Lalit Kumar …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Transport Corporation .....Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CWP No.15622 of 2026 Parvez Akther …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Transport Corporation .....Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. CWP No.15623 of 2026 Lekh Ram …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Transport Corporation .....Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2 5. CWP No.15624 of 2026 Rattan Singh …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Transport Corporation .....Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. CWP No.15625 of 2026 Kulwant Singh …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Transport Corporation .....Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Daleep Chand, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent in all the matters except CWP Nos.15622 and 15625 of 2026. Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent in CWP No.15622 of 2026. Mr. Abhishek Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent in CWP No.15625 of 2026. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are some defects in the pleadings as also in the relief clause of the writ petitions. Relevant documents have also 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 3 not been appended with the petitions. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law after incorporating appropriate pleadings. Granting such liberty, the present writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 10, 2026 Judge Mukesh