⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
81–100 · Page 5 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38835 · CRMPM/1363/2026
2 2026:HHC:38835 Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘BNSS’), for releasing them, on bail, during the pendency of trial, in case FIR No.125 of 2023, dated 15.09.2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘FIR, in question’), registered under Sections 22, 25, 29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Subst…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
81–100 · Page 5 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38835 · CRMPM/1363/2026
2 2026:HHC:38835 Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘BNSS’), for releasing them, on bail, during the pendency of trial, in case FIR No.125 of 2023, dated 15.09.2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘FIR, in question’), registered under Sections 22, 25, 29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Subst…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/18017/2025
“(vii) Employees, who were covered under the National Pension System (NPS) and have already retired/ died, between the period 15.05.2003 to 31.03.2023 and who fulfil the eligibility criteria under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, such retired employee and eligible family member of deceased employee, sh…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38654 · CWP/11182/2025
2026:HHC:38654 case at hand has been awarded in favour of respondent No. 6, despite being not eligible. 2. In June 2025, the respondents had invited an Expression of Interest to outsource manpower to run and manage Jan Aushadhi Generic Drug Store at SLBS Government Medical College and Hospital, Mandi, Nerchowk, Himacha…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:39389 · CMPMO/421/2026
2. The facts as emerge in the present case are that the respondent/plaintiff, Rajneesh Awasthi, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the present petitioner/judgment debtor, 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:39389 ) Prakash Chand, in the Court of le…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15254/2026
es.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15719/2026
respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ …
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15737/2026
2. Learned Deputy Advocate General has apprised that aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No. 205 of 2025 and other connected matters. 3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions,…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CMP/21389/2026
The appeal, in the case at hand, was decided on 21.07.2023. However, from the modified award, it is evident that no amount had been awarded in favour of respondent No.6, hence, present application on her behalf is not maintainable. In view of the aforesaid and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allo…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:39043 · ARB.C/594/2024
2026:HHC:39043 the Director (North), Himachal Pradesh State Forest Development Corporation Limited, Dharamshala, District Kangra, was initially appointed as an Arbitrator, and arbitration proceedings were initiated. 3. Reference is made to the letter dated 22.11.2023 (Annexure P-6), since the appointment of the employe…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/1329/2024
? yes…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
EX.PT/66/2026
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the above position. 3. In view of above, this execution petition is 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - disposed of. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviv…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CR.R/3/2026
? Yes.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15576/2026
record that State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. Vs. Devinder Kumar & Ors.3 instituted by the State of Himachal Pradesh against the aforementioned judgment, has been dismissed by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 29.07.2026. While dismissing the appeal, the Hon’ble Apex Court granted four months’ time to the State Government to do…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
2025:HHC:38122 · CRMMO/986/2026
3. The record shows that the petitioner/accused was convicted and sentenced by learned Trial Court. The petitioner/accused unsuccessfully challenged his conviction and sentence before learned First Appellate Court and before this Court in Cr. Revision No. 602 of 2025 titled Ashwani Kumar versus Sapna Devi. 4. The Divis…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
EX.P./2007/2026
2. Careful perusal of aforesaid order/judgment, sought to be executed in the present proceedings, reveals that Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, while disposing of the writ petition filed by the petitioner, directed that representation made by the petitioner shall be decided by the competent 1 Whether the reporters of t…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
EX.P./1928/2026
2. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds that remaining sum on account of dearness relief and differential amount has been disbursed in favour of the petitioners. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. In view of the above…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15616/2026
within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation …
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38477 · CR.R/205/2015
2026:HHC:38477 parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience). 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revision are that the police presented a challan before the learned Trial Court against the accused for the commission …
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
COPC/1113/2026
Taking note of the aforesaid documents, the present contempt proceedings are closed. Notice issued to the respondent is discharged. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 redressal of her…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15633/2026
competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
CWP/18017/2025
“(vii) Employees, who were covered under the National Pension System (NPS) and have already retired/ died, between the period 15.05.2003 to 31.03.2023 and who fulfil the eligibility criteria under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, such retired employee and eligible family member of deceased employee, sh…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38654 · CWP/11182/2025
2026:HHC:38654 case at hand has been awarded in favour of respondent No. 6, despite being not eligible. 2. In June 2025, the respondents had invited an Expression of Interest to outsource manpower to run and manage Jan Aushadhi Generic Drug Store at SLBS Government Medical College and Hospital, Mandi, Nerchowk, Himacha…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:39389 · CMPMO/421/2026
2. The facts as emerge in the present case are that the respondent/plaintiff, Rajneesh Awasthi, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the present petitioner/judgment debtor, 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:39389 ) Prakash Chand, in the Court of le…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15254/2026
es.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15719/2026
respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ …
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15737/2026
2. Learned Deputy Advocate General has apprised that aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No. 205 of 2025 and other connected matters. 3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions,…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CMP/21389/2026
The appeal, in the case at hand, was decided on 21.07.2023. However, from the modified award, it is evident that no amount had been awarded in favour of respondent No.6, hence, present application on her behalf is not maintainable. In view of the aforesaid and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allo…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:39043 · ARB.C/594/2024
2026:HHC:39043 the Director (North), Himachal Pradesh State Forest Development Corporation Limited, Dharamshala, District Kangra, was initially appointed as an Arbitrator, and arbitration proceedings were initiated. 3. Reference is made to the letter dated 22.11.2023 (Annexure P-6), since the appointment of the employe…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/1329/2024
? yes…
Himachal Pradesh High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
EX.PT/66/2026
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the above position. 3. In view of above, this execution petition is 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - disposed of. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviv…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CR.R/3/2026
? Yes.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15576/2026
record that State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. Vs. Devinder Kumar & Ors.3 instituted by the State of Himachal Pradesh against the aforementioned judgment, has been dismissed by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 29.07.2026. While dismissing the appeal, the Hon’ble Apex Court granted four months’ time to the State Government to do…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
2025:HHC:38122 · CRMMO/986/2026
3. The record shows that the petitioner/accused was convicted and sentenced by learned Trial Court. The petitioner/accused unsuccessfully challenged his conviction and sentence before learned First Appellate Court and before this Court in Cr. Revision No. 602 of 2025 titled Ashwani Kumar versus Sapna Devi. 4. The Divis…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
EX.P./2007/2026
2. Careful perusal of aforesaid order/judgment, sought to be executed in the present proceedings, reveals that Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, while disposing of the writ petition filed by the petitioner, directed that representation made by the petitioner shall be decided by the competent 1 Whether the reporters of t…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
EX.P./1928/2026
2. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds that remaining sum on account of dearness relief and differential amount has been disbursed in favour of the petitioners. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. In view of the above…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15616/2026
within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation …
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:38477 · CR.R/205/2015
2026:HHC:38477 parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience). 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revision are that the police presented a challan before the learned Trial Court against the accused for the commission …
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
COPC/1113/2026
Taking note of the aforesaid documents, the present contempt proceedings are closed. Notice issued to the respondent is discharged. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 redressal of her…
Himachal Pradesh High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15633/2026
competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis