IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.1329 of 2024 Decided on: 11.09.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Manmohan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Vinod K Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the with the efflux of time, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge September 11, 2026 R.Atal 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.1329 of 2024 Decided on: 11.09.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Manmohan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Vinod K Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the with the efflux of time, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge September 11, 2026 R.Atal 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes