IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 3 of 2026 Date of Decision : 10.9.2026 Parneet Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Ravi Tanta, Advocate. For the respondent/State : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) After arguing the matters for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition and to file a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 10th September, 2026 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 3 of 2026 Date of Decision : 10.9.2026 Parneet Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Ravi Tanta, Advocate. For the respondent/State : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) After arguing the matters for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition and to file a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 10th September, 2026 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.