⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
721–740 · Page 37 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10579/2026
Judge July 06, 2026 (Vinod)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/12877/2026
Application stands disposed of CWP No. 14241 of 2025 Reply, as prayed, be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder thereto, as prayed, be filed within two weeks. CMP No. 21551 of 2025 Heard. In order dated 10.04.2026 [Annexure A-2] passed in Civil Appeal No.4716 of 2026, titled Income Tax Officer v. Tej Partap Singh, the Ape…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
721–740 · Page 37 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10579/2026
Judge July 06, 2026 (Vinod)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/12877/2026
Application stands disposed of CWP No. 14241 of 2025 Reply, as prayed, be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder thereto, as prayed, be filed within two weeks. CMP No. 21551 of 2025 Heard. In order dated 10.04.2026 [Annexure A-2] passed in Civil Appeal No.4716 of 2026, titled Income Tax Officer v. Tej Partap Singh, the Ape…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10883/2026
2. Learned counsel for the parties stated at the Bar that similar matters were considered by this Court in a batch of cases, lead case of which is CWP No.1540 of 2013 (Bakshi Ram vs. Union of India), decided on 6th November, 2013 and prayed that this writ petition be disposed of in terms of the judgment (supra). Their …
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/14034/2026
The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge July 06, 2026 (V.Himalvi)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10763/2026
any, being relied upon by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 6th July, 2026. (jai)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
EX.P./951/2026
dated 09.04.2024. 2. Since this Court had only given the direction to the petitioners to make a representation either jointly or separately to the respective Respondent/Competent Authority, to consider their case in terms of the judgment passed in Yashwant Singh’s case (supra), the mandate contained in Ravi Kant’s case…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
EX.P./1238/2026
2. Taking note of above, this execution petition to stand disposed of. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - Pending misce…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
EX.P./947/2026
2. A perusal of aforesaid order dated 04.07.2026, reveals that the petitioner has been held entitled for higher pay scale i.e. Rs.40,100/-, after two years of regular service w.e.f. 25.07.2019. Further the due and admissible arrear, 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 has been orde…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CRMPM/1099/2026
Judge 06th July, 2026 Rajeev Raturi 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CMPMO/361/2025
2 2. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the civil suit along with application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, which was filed before the learned Civil Judge, Nahan, District Sirmaur with liberty to file a fresh s…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:26708 · EX.P./653/2026
2. A perusal of office order dated 06.04.2026 reveals that the petitioner has been allowed higher pay stage in the concerned level of pay matrix i.e. Rs.40,100/- after completion 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 of two years of regular service, subject to final outcome of LPA fi…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/11066/2026
2. As per the applicants, respondent No.1, Naresh Kumar had expired on 29.08.2024 and left behind his legal representatives, as mentioned in para-5 of the application [CMP(M) No.753 of 2026), who are required to be brought on record. The applications are duly supported by the affidavits of applicants No.1 to 3, namely …
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10528/2026
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 06, 2026 (Vinod)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:26721 · CWP/1632/2024
2. Without making any observation on the merit of the case, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for. If any representation is filed by the petitioner within two weeks from today, same be decided by the Authority within twelve weeks as from the date of receipt thereof. 3. The petition stands…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10531/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10506/2026
Dharam Singh v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.10506 of 2026 06.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 5. Mr. Aman Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.6. Issue notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Assistant Advocate General and …
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10324/2026
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 03, 2026 (narender) 34 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/15695/2026
Accordingly, this application is allowed. Registry is directed to carry out necessary correction corrections in order dated 19.11.2024, by mentioning therein ‘CWP No.342 of 2021, titled Yashwant Singh & others Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh & another, decided on 31.08.2022’, instead of CWP No.2004 of 2017, alongw…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Jul 2026Full text
OMPM/152/2026
The learned counsel for the respondent has opposed the application. In view of the reasons stated in the application, more particularly, paras 3 to 5 thereof, which is duly supported by an affidavit, coupled with submissions made by the learned vice counsel for the applicant, delay in filing the main appeal is condoned…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10423/2026
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 03, 2026 (narender) 51 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10883/2026
2. Learned counsel for the parties stated at the Bar that similar matters were considered by this Court in a batch of cases, lead case of which is CWP No.1540 of 2013 (Bakshi Ram vs. Union of India), decided on 6th November, 2013 and prayed that this writ petition be disposed of in terms of the judgment (supra). Their …
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/14034/2026
The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge July 06, 2026 (V.Himalvi)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10763/2026
any, being relied upon by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 6th July, 2026. (jai)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
EX.P./951/2026
dated 09.04.2024. 2. Since this Court had only given the direction to the petitioners to make a representation either jointly or separately to the respective Respondent/Competent Authority, to consider their case in terms of the judgment passed in Yashwant Singh’s case (supra), the mandate contained in Ravi Kant’s case…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
EX.P./1238/2026
2. Taking note of above, this execution petition to stand disposed of. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - Pending misce…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
EX.P./947/2026
2. A perusal of aforesaid order dated 04.07.2026, reveals that the petitioner has been held entitled for higher pay scale i.e. Rs.40,100/-, after two years of regular service w.e.f. 25.07.2019. Further the due and admissible arrear, 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 has been orde…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CRMPM/1099/2026
Judge 06th July, 2026 Rajeev Raturi 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CMPMO/361/2025
2 2. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the civil suit along with application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, which was filed before the learned Civil Judge, Nahan, District Sirmaur with liberty to file a fresh s…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:26708 · EX.P./653/2026
2. A perusal of office order dated 06.04.2026 reveals that the petitioner has been allowed higher pay stage in the concerned level of pay matrix i.e. Rs.40,100/- after completion 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 of two years of regular service, subject to final outcome of LPA fi…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/11066/2026
2. As per the applicants, respondent No.1, Naresh Kumar had expired on 29.08.2024 and left behind his legal representatives, as mentioned in para-5 of the application [CMP(M) No.753 of 2026), who are required to be brought on record. The applications are duly supported by the affidavits of applicants No.1 to 3, namely …
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10528/2026
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 06, 2026 (Vinod)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:26721 · CWP/1632/2024
2. Without making any observation on the merit of the case, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for. If any representation is filed by the petitioner within two weeks from today, same be decided by the Authority within twelve weeks as from the date of receipt thereof. 3. The petition stands…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10531/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court6 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10506/2026
Dharam Singh v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.10506 of 2026 06.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 5. Mr. Aman Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.6. Issue notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Assistant Advocate General and …
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10324/2026
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 03, 2026 (narender) 34 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/15695/2026
Accordingly, this application is allowed. Registry is directed to carry out necessary correction corrections in order dated 19.11.2024, by mentioning therein ‘CWP No.342 of 2021, titled Yashwant Singh & others Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh & another, decided on 31.08.2022’, instead of CWP No.2004 of 2017, alongw…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Jul 2026Full text
OMPM/152/2026
The learned counsel for the respondent has opposed the application. In view of the reasons stated in the application, more particularly, paras 3 to 5 thereof, which is duly supported by an affidavit, coupled with submissions made by the learned vice counsel for the applicant, delay in filing the main appeal is condoned…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10423/2026
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 03, 2026 (narender) 51 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis