IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No. 1099 of 2026 Date of Decision: 06.07.2026 ________________________________________________________________ Maninder Kaur .....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ..…Respondent ________________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner: Mr. Harish Sharma and Mr. Vipan Rajta, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for State. SI Chetan Chauhan, SHO, PS Jubbal, present in person along with record. ________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Respondent-State has filed status report and SI Chetan Chauhan, SHO, PS Jubbal, is present along with record. 2. Having perused status report, learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, at this stage, with liberty to file afresh, at an appropriate stage, if required and desired. Ordered accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma) Judge 06th July, 2026 Rajeev Raturi 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No. 1099 of 2026 Date of Decision: 06.07.2026 ________________________________________________________________ Maninder Kaur .....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ..…Respondent ________________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner: Mr. Harish Sharma and Mr. Vipan Rajta, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for State. SI Chetan Chauhan, SHO, PS Jubbal, present in person along with record. ________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Respondent-State has filed status report and SI Chetan Chauhan, SHO, PS Jubbal, is present along with record. 2. Having perused status report, learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, at this stage, with liberty to file afresh, at an appropriate stage, if required and desired. Ordered accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma) Judge 06th July, 2026 Rajeev Raturi 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?