IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.951 of 2026 Decided on: 06.07.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Kumari Manorma and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners: Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj , Judge (Oral) A perusal of affidavit/reply filed by the respondents reveals that petitioner No.1 has been granted the benefit in terms of the judgment dated 22.12.2023, passed in CWP No.10575 of 2023, titled, Ravi Kant and others vs. State of H.P. and others, vide office order dated 11.03.2024, in view of the fact that her case is similar to the decision passed in CWP No.342 of 2021, titled as Yashwant Singh and others vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh and another alongwith connected matters, decided on 31.08.2022. So far as petitioners No.2 to 10 are concerned, their claim has been rejected vide office order 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 dated 09.04.2024.

2. Since this Court had only given the direction to the petitioners to make a representation either jointly or separately to the respective Respondent/Competent Authority, to consider their case in terms of the judgment passed in Yashwant Singh’s case (supra), the mandate contained in Ravi Kant’s case (supra), has been duly complied with and the claim of petitioners No.2 to 10 stands rejected. 3. So far as petitioner No.1 is concerned, though the respondents have passed an office order dated 11.03.2024, the consequential benefits, if not already released be released in her favour within eight weeks from today. 4. Petitioners No.2 to 10 are at liberty to avail an appropriate remedy in case they are aggrieved by the order dated 09.04.2024, passed by the Dy. Director Elementary Education, Shimla, District Shimla-171004. 5. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 06 th July , 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.951 of 2026 Decided on: 06.07.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Kumari Manorma and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners: Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj , Judge (Oral) A perusal of affidavit/reply filed by the respondents reveals that petitioner No.1 has been granted the benefit in terms of the judgment dated 22.12.2023, passed in CWP No.10575 of 2023, titled, Ravi Kant and others vs. State of H.P. and others, vide office order dated 11.03.2024, in view of the fact that her case is similar to the decision passed in CWP No.342 of 2021, titled as Yashwant Singh and others vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh and another alongwith connected matters, decided on 31.08.2022. So far as petitioners No.2 to 10 are concerned, their claim has been rejected vide office order 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 dated 09.04.2024.

2. Since this Court had only given the direction to the petitioners to make a representation either jointly or separately to the respective Respondent/Competent Authority, to consider their case in terms of the judgment passed in Yashwant Singh’s case (supra), the mandate contained in Ravi Kant’s case (supra), has been duly complied with and the claim of petitioners No.2 to 10 stands rejected. 3. So far as petitioner No.1 is concerned, though the respondents have passed an office order dated 11.03.2024, the consequential benefits, if not already released be released in her favour within eight weeks from today. 4. Petitioners No.2 to 10 are at liberty to avail an appropriate remedy in case they are aggrieved by the order dated 09.04.2024, passed by the Dy. Director Elementary Education, Shimla, District Shimla-171004. 5. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 06 th July , 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge