⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
681–700 · Page 35 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Jul 2026Full text
CMPMO/231/2026
2. The facts of the case are that the plaintiffs/respondents filed a suit for declaration to the effect that the plaintiffs along with defendant No. 1, are owners in possession of joint family property i.e. Hotel Monarch The Mall Manali, Chop stick 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10900/2026
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
681–700 · Page 35 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Jul 2026Full text
CMPMO/231/2026
2. The facts of the case are that the plaintiffs/respondents filed a suit for declaration to the effect that the plaintiffs along with defendant No. 1, are owners in possession of joint family property i.e. Hotel Monarch The Mall Manali, Chop stick 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court9 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10900/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 10900 of 2026 Decided on: 09.07.2026 Sapna Devi & others … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? ____________________________________________________ _…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10875/2026
3. A perusal of the affidavit filed along with the present petition demonstrates that the petitioner as of now is 55 years of age. He is praying for issuance of directions to re-employee, re-enroll and re-enlist 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… him as a Home Guard. The pet…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:27975 · CRWP/34/2026
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that initial detention as such was on the basis of three FIRs and he had been acquitted in the first FIR in question bearing FIR No. 16/2021, dated 18.03.2021 and the representation had been filed on 06.05.2026 (Annexure P-4), which was rejected on 02.06.2026 (Annexur…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CRMMO/469/2025
Mediator, which is made part of the instant judgment, reveals that respondents No.2 and 3, who happen to be wife and husband, have decided to get their marriage dissolved by way of mutual consent by filing joint petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act in the competent Court of law. Since parties before th…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CRMMO/649/2026
compromise arrived inter se parties, whereby both the parties have resolved to settle their dispute amicably interse them. 2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the pleadings as well as other material adduced on record by the respective parties, are that the FIR, sought to be quashed in the instant procee…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/20748/2025
Petitioner rendered 20 years of service from 1984 to 2005 as Anganwari Worker and 09 years & 07 months of service as Supervisor. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was delay in 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 petitioner’s regular appointment as…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10816/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10837/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:5273 · CRMMO/676/2025
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 2026:HHC:5273 be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned trial Court for convenience). 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the complainant filed a complaint under Section 1…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
EX.P./1306/2026
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 8th July, 2026. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10815/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10826/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CRMP/2101/2026
The amount deposited before the Registry of this Court was wrongly mentioned as ₹70,000/- in para 3 of the judgment/order dated 12.03.2026 and it was also wrongly mentioned that no other amount has been deposited before any other Court. There are purely clerical error, hence, present application is allowed. The amount …
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:27594 · CRMMO/342/2026
2026:HHC:27594 in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned trial Court for convenience) 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the complainant filed a complaint before the learned Trial Court against the accused for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 4…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CMP.M/1812/2025
Reply has been filed stating that there is a delay of 232 days and not 149 days, and that there is no explanation for the period from 19th December, 2024 to 3rd March, 2025, on account of which a substantial period of delay remains unexplained. Counsel for the State, on the other hand, pointed out that the Court normal…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CMP.M/712/2026
State of H.P. & Ors. Vs. Mehar Chand & Anr. CMP(M) No. 712/2026 08.07.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the appellants/State. CMP(M) No. 712/2026 Notice[ issued to respondents No. 1 & 2 has been received back duly served, however, there is no representation on their behalf, hence they are …
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:27637 · CWPOA/636/2019
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:27593 · CRMMO/341/2026
2026:HHC:27593 in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned trial Court for convenience) 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the complainant filed a complaint before the learned Trial Court against the accused for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 4…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:27509 · CRWP/14/2023
6. Vide detailed order dated 26.12.2023, directions were issued to the Deputy Superintendent of Police and the 4 2026:HHC:27509 Superintendent of Police, Kangra, be moved to other posts to ensure the fair investigation in the FIR No. 55 registered on 16.11.2023, which order was challenged in the SLP No. 54019/2023 file…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 10900 of 2026 Decided on: 09.07.2026 Sapna Devi & others … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? ____________________________________________________ _…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10875/2026
3. A perusal of the affidavit filed along with the present petition demonstrates that the petitioner as of now is 55 years of age. He is praying for issuance of directions to re-employee, re-enroll and re-enlist 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… him as a Home Guard. The pet…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:27975 · CRWP/34/2026
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that initial detention as such was on the basis of three FIRs and he had been acquitted in the first FIR in question bearing FIR No. 16/2021, dated 18.03.2021 and the representation had been filed on 06.05.2026 (Annexure P-4), which was rejected on 02.06.2026 (Annexur…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CRMMO/469/2025
Mediator, which is made part of the instant judgment, reveals that respondents No.2 and 3, who happen to be wife and husband, have decided to get their marriage dissolved by way of mutual consent by filing joint petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act in the competent Court of law. Since parties before th…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CRMMO/649/2026
compromise arrived inter se parties, whereby both the parties have resolved to settle their dispute amicably interse them. 2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the pleadings as well as other material adduced on record by the respective parties, are that the FIR, sought to be quashed in the instant procee…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/20748/2025
Petitioner rendered 20 years of service from 1984 to 2005 as Anganwari Worker and 09 years & 07 months of service as Supervisor. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was delay in 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 petitioner’s regular appointment as…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10816/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10837/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:5273 · CRMMO/676/2025
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 2026:HHC:5273 be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned trial Court for convenience). 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the complainant filed a complaint under Section 1…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
EX.P./1306/2026
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 8th July, 2026. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10815/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10826/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CRMP/2101/2026
The amount deposited before the Registry of this Court was wrongly mentioned as ₹70,000/- in para 3 of the judgment/order dated 12.03.2026 and it was also wrongly mentioned that no other amount has been deposited before any other Court. There are purely clerical error, hence, present application is allowed. The amount …
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:27594 · CRMMO/342/2026
2026:HHC:27594 in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned trial Court for convenience) 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the complainant filed a complaint before the learned Trial Court against the accused for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 4…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CMP.M/1812/2025
Reply has been filed stating that there is a delay of 232 days and not 149 days, and that there is no explanation for the period from 19th December, 2024 to 3rd March, 2025, on account of which a substantial period of delay remains unexplained. Counsel for the State, on the other hand, pointed out that the Court normal…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
CMP.M/712/2026
State of H.P. & Ors. Vs. Mehar Chand & Anr. CMP(M) No. 712/2026 08.07.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the appellants/State. CMP(M) No. 712/2026 Notice[ issued to respondents No. 1 & 2 has been received back duly served, however, there is no representation on their behalf, hence they are …
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:27637 · CWPOA/636/2019
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:27593 · CRMMO/341/2026
2026:HHC:27593 in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned trial Court for convenience) 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the complainant filed a complaint before the learned Trial Court against the accused for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 4…
Himachal Pradesh High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:27509 · CRWP/14/2023
6. Vide detailed order dated 26.12.2023, directions were issued to the Deputy Superintendent of Police and the 4 2026:HHC:27509 Superintendent of Police, Kangra, be moved to other posts to ensure the fair investigation in the FIR No. 55 registered on 16.11.2023, which order was challenged in the SLP No. 54019/2023 file…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis