⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
681–700 · Page 35 of 57
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
MCA/269/2026
1. Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to apply in the family court at Pune for traveling expenses. 2. Leave granted with liberty as prayed. 3. If an application is made by the applicant for seeking traveling expenses, the same shall be considered in…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
681–700 · Page 35 of 57
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
MCA/269/2026
1. Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to apply in the family court at Pune for traveling expenses. 2. Leave granted with liberty as prayed. 3. If an application is made by the applicant for seeking traveling expenses, the same shall be considered in…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:10770 · CAF/3599/2025
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Mr. U.A. Gosavi, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. S.H. Bhagat, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. M.A. Kadu, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. ………… CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATE : 19-08-2026. 1. By this composite appli…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
IA/2506/2026
205-IA-2506-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Digitally signed by CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARJUN ARJUN VITTHAL VITTHAL KUDHEKAR KUDHEKAR Date: INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2506 OF 2026 2026.08.19 20:15:47 +0530 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.699 OF 2023 Vishal Manik Sarde ...Applicant Versus The State of Mahar…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
WP/3016/2019
33A. WP 3016-2019.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3016 OF 2019 Sujit Ramraj Jaisawal …. Petitioner Versus Reliance Enterprises And 3 Ors. … Respondents ….. Mr. Jayesh Bhatt a/w Adv. Nazreen Manchekar for the Petitioners. Adv. Shivani Samel for Responde…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:37784-DB · WP/4248/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:37784-DB {1} 10-wp-4248-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 10 WRIT PETITION NO. 4248 OF 2026 Kailash Ramchandra Upadhye And Another VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others ... Mr. M.D. Gitte, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38678 · CA/8964/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 948 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8963 OF 2026 IN FA/1194/2020 MARGU NAGAPPA DHOTRE AND ORS. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS. ... Ms. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f. Mr. L. C. Patil, Advocate for Applicants Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for Re…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38349-DB · WP/10191/2026
2. As per Government Resolution dated 31/07/2026, the petitioner has to challenge the decision rendered by the Grievance Redressal Committee before the Committee headed by Divisional President, Maharashtra State Board and Secondary and Higher Secondary Education of the concerned Division, which he has already done. SVH…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:10776 · CAF/3254/2026
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ms. Sneha Padwekar, Advocate h/f Ms. S.H. Bhatia, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. K.P. Mirache, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 5. ………… CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATE : 19-08-2026. 1. It is pointed out that the pre…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
WP/1982/2026
6-WP-1982-2026 (OS).DOC registered, thus putting an end to the dispute involved in this Writ Petition. Therefore, the matter can be closed. 2. Mr. Pradip Kadam, learned counsel for the Petitioner, in his usual fairness, has accepted such submission of Ms. Arora and has submitted that he has no objection to dispose of t…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38845 · FA/1867/2011
Judge Senior Division, Ahmedpur Camp at Udgir, District Latur in LAR Nos.422/2007, 429/2007, 424/2007, 425/2007, 423/2007, 426/2007, 427/2007 and 428/2007, whereby the learned Reference Court enhanced the compensation. The Claimants filed cross objections seeking further compensation for their acquired land. 3. Brief f…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AS:34552 · WP/2532/2026
4. Considering the delay being the minor, the delay is condoned subject to the payment of cost of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited in the trial Court within a period of four weeks. 5. The petition stands disposed of. [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] Page 2 of 2 19th AUGUST, 2026 Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable J…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38851 · CA/8684/2009
Judge Senior Division, Ahmedpur Camp at Udgir, District Latur in LAR Nos.422/2007, 429/2007, 424/2007, 425/2007, 423/2007, 426/2007, 427/2007 and 428/2007, whereby the learned Reference Court enhanced the compensation. The Claimants filed cross objections seeking further compensation for their acquired land. 3. Brief f…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
ARBP/10/2025
2. Hence, during the pendency of the proceedings before the Arbitral Tribunal, there shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a). 3. However, it shall be open to the Respondent to apply for vacation or modification of the interim order passed by this Court before the Arbitral Tribunal. 4. The Petitioner shall…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:37602 · CRA/157/2022
2. The respondents contended that though there was N.A. order, the N.A. use was not started within a year and therefore, conditional order was not passed as it is not N.A. land. It is therefore, cra157.22 -2- prayed to reject the application. 3. The learned trial court in para 12 and 13 observed as under:- “12. Accordi…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:37428-DB · FCA/79/2018
3. Today, none appeared for the appellant in either of these appeals and the private paper books have also not been filed. In the circumstances, it appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting these appeals. Accordingly, both the appeals stand dismissed for want of steps. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPK…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:37301 · WP/3956/2013
1. The petitioner has challenged the order / communication dated 23.04.2013 rendered by the Aurangabad Mathadi and Unprotected Labour Board, directing the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs. 2,26,984/-. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order / communication has been passed without extending an …
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
WP/2187/2024
40-WP-2187-2024.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2187 OF 2024 Vilas Ranganath Kale ...Petitioner Versus Mumbai Port Authority ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3112 OF 2026 Dattatray Baba Gejge Serving In Mumbai Port Authority ...Petitioner Versus C…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
WP/3094/2019
33K. WP 3094-2019.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3094 OF 2019 Rahul Shyam Manohar Pandey …. Petitioner Versus Reliance Enterprises And 3 Ors. … Respondents ….. Mr. Jayesh Bhatt a/w Adv. Nazreen Manchekar for the Petitioners. Adv. Shivani Samel for Res…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:37915 · WP/10282/2023
. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, the petition is heard for final disposal. ( 2 ) 928 WP 10282 OF 2023 2. It is not in dispute that respondent No.2/employee was lawfully appointed as a Watchman under the service of the present petitioner – school management. The competent authority i.e.…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-GOA:1665-DB · WP/317/2026
1. he Petitioner has impugned an order dated 07.05.2025 passed by the Regional Passport Oicer, Panaji refusing to grant Page 1 of 4 19th August 2026 904-WP-317-2026.DOC the Petitioner an Indian Passport and rejecting his application under Section 6(2)(a) of the Passport Act, 1967. 2. he Petition has been opposed by Mr …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2026:BHC-NAG:10770 · CAF/3599/2025
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Mr. U.A. Gosavi, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. S.H. Bhagat, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. M.A. Kadu, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. ………… CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATE : 19-08-2026. 1. By this composite appli…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
IA/2506/2026
205-IA-2506-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Digitally signed by CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARJUN ARJUN VITTHAL VITTHAL KUDHEKAR KUDHEKAR Date: INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2506 OF 2026 2026.08.19 20:15:47 +0530 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.699 OF 2023 Vishal Manik Sarde ...Applicant Versus The State of Mahar…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
WP/3016/2019
33A. WP 3016-2019.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3016 OF 2019 Sujit Ramraj Jaisawal …. Petitioner Versus Reliance Enterprises And 3 Ors. … Respondents ….. Mr. Jayesh Bhatt a/w Adv. Nazreen Manchekar for the Petitioners. Adv. Shivani Samel for Responde…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:37784-DB · WP/4248/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:37784-DB {1} 10-wp-4248-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 10 WRIT PETITION NO. 4248 OF 2026 Kailash Ramchandra Upadhye And Another VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others ... Mr. M.D. Gitte, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38678 · CA/8964/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 948 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8963 OF 2026 IN FA/1194/2020 MARGU NAGAPPA DHOTRE AND ORS. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS. ... Ms. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f. Mr. L. C. Patil, Advocate for Applicants Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for Re…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38349-DB · WP/10191/2026
2. As per Government Resolution dated 31/07/2026, the petitioner has to challenge the decision rendered by the Grievance Redressal Committee before the Committee headed by Divisional President, Maharashtra State Board and Secondary and Higher Secondary Education of the concerned Division, which he has already done. SVH…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:10776 · CAF/3254/2026
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ms. Sneha Padwekar, Advocate h/f Ms. S.H. Bhatia, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. K.P. Mirache, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 5. ………… CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATE : 19-08-2026. 1. It is pointed out that the pre…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
WP/1982/2026
6-WP-1982-2026 (OS).DOC registered, thus putting an end to the dispute involved in this Writ Petition. Therefore, the matter can be closed. 2. Mr. Pradip Kadam, learned counsel for the Petitioner, in his usual fairness, has accepted such submission of Ms. Arora and has submitted that he has no objection to dispose of t…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38845 · FA/1867/2011
Judge Senior Division, Ahmedpur Camp at Udgir, District Latur in LAR Nos.422/2007, 429/2007, 424/2007, 425/2007, 423/2007, 426/2007, 427/2007 and 428/2007, whereby the learned Reference Court enhanced the compensation. The Claimants filed cross objections seeking further compensation for their acquired land. 3. Brief f…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AS:34552 · WP/2532/2026
4. Considering the delay being the minor, the delay is condoned subject to the payment of cost of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited in the trial Court within a period of four weeks. 5. The petition stands disposed of. [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] Page 2 of 2 19th AUGUST, 2026 Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable J…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38851 · CA/8684/2009
Judge Senior Division, Ahmedpur Camp at Udgir, District Latur in LAR Nos.422/2007, 429/2007, 424/2007, 425/2007, 423/2007, 426/2007, 427/2007 and 428/2007, whereby the learned Reference Court enhanced the compensation. The Claimants filed cross objections seeking further compensation for their acquired land. 3. Brief f…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
ARBP/10/2025
2. Hence, during the pendency of the proceedings before the Arbitral Tribunal, there shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a). 3. However, it shall be open to the Respondent to apply for vacation or modification of the interim order passed by this Court before the Arbitral Tribunal. 4. The Petitioner shall…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:37602 · CRA/157/2022
2. The respondents contended that though there was N.A. order, the N.A. use was not started within a year and therefore, conditional order was not passed as it is not N.A. land. It is therefore, cra157.22 -2- prayed to reject the application. 3. The learned trial court in para 12 and 13 observed as under:- “12. Accordi…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:37428-DB · FCA/79/2018
3. Today, none appeared for the appellant in either of these appeals and the private paper books have also not been filed. In the circumstances, it appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting these appeals. Accordingly, both the appeals stand dismissed for want of steps. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPK…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:37301 · WP/3956/2013
1. The petitioner has challenged the order / communication dated 23.04.2013 rendered by the Aurangabad Mathadi and Unprotected Labour Board, directing the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs. 2,26,984/-. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order / communication has been passed without extending an …
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
WP/2187/2024
40-WP-2187-2024.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2187 OF 2024 Vilas Ranganath Kale ...Petitioner Versus Mumbai Port Authority ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3112 OF 2026 Dattatray Baba Gejge Serving In Mumbai Port Authority ...Petitioner Versus C…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
WP/3094/2019
33K. WP 3094-2019.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3094 OF 2019 Rahul Shyam Manohar Pandey …. Petitioner Versus Reliance Enterprises And 3 Ors. … Respondents ….. Mr. Jayesh Bhatt a/w Adv. Nazreen Manchekar for the Petitioners. Adv. Shivani Samel for Res…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:37915 · WP/10282/2023
. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, the petition is heard for final disposal. ( 2 ) 928 WP 10282 OF 2023 2. It is not in dispute that respondent No.2/employee was lawfully appointed as a Watchman under the service of the present petitioner – school management. The competent authority i.e.…
Bombay High Court19 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-GOA:1665-DB · WP/317/2026
1. he Petitioner has impugned an order dated 07.05.2025 passed by the Regional Passport Oicer, Panaji refusing to grant Page 1 of 4 19th August 2026 904-WP-317-2026.DOC the Petitioner an Indian Passport and rejecting his application under Section 6(2)(a) of the Passport Act, 1967. 2. he Petition has been opposed by Mr …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis