2026:BHC-AUG:38678 ( 1 ) 948 CA 8963 OF 2026 2 This order is corrected vide speaking to the minutes of order dated 21.08.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 948 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8963 OF 2026 IN FA/1194/2020 MARGU NAGAPPA DHOTRE AND ORS. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS. ... Ms. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f. Mr. L. C. Patil, Advocate for Applicants Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State Mr. M. N. Kalyane h/f. Mr. G. B. Rajale, Advocate for Respondent No.3 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8964 OF 2026 IN FA/1192/2020 MAHADEO LAHU GUND. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1193 OF 2020 THE EX. ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT STRENGTHENING DIVISION, OMERGA AND ORS VERSUS RAJARAM DADARAO WADANE … CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATE : 19.08.2026 PER COURT :- ( 2 ) 948 CA 8963 OF 2026 2 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8963 OF 2026 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8964 OF 2026 . These applications are filed for withdrawal of the balance amount pending in this Court after the earlier withdrawal. The award amount was deposited by the acquiring body with this Court, out of which 75% of the amount is already withdrawn by the claimants. The present applications are the successive applications seeking withdrawal of the balance amount.

2. Learned Advocate for the applicants relies upon the order dated 25.04.2025 passed by this Court in Civil Application No.4359 of 2025 in First Appeal No.1179 of 2020. She submits that the applicants had withdrawn 50% of the amount by furnishing an undertaking before this Court and 25% of the amount by furnishing solvent surety. It is further submitted that for withdrawal of the balance amount, the applicants are ready to furnish solvent surety. 3. Learned Advocate for the acquiring body fairly accepts that by the order dated 25.04.2025, this Court had permitted withdrawal of the balance amount upon furnishing solvent surety. Needless to mention, the cited case arises out of the same land acquisition proceedings. ( 3 ) 948 CA 8963 OF 2026 2 4. In view of the above, and for the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed. 5. The applicants are permitted to withdraw the balance amount pending in this Court out of the amount deposited by the acquiring body. Needless to mention, the said withdrawal shall include the interest accrued thereon, subject to production of solvent security by the applicants to the satisfaction of the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] PRW

2026:BHC-AUG:38678 ( 1 ) 948 CA 8963 OF 2026 2 This order is corrected vide speaking to the minutes of order dated 21.08.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 948 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8963 OF 2026 IN FA/1194/2020 MARGU NAGAPPA DHOTRE AND ORS. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS. ... Ms. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f. Mr. L. C. Patil, Advocate for Applicants Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State Mr. M. N. Kalyane h/f. Mr. G. B. Rajale, Advocate for Respondent No.3 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8964 OF 2026 IN FA/1192/2020 MAHADEO LAHU GUND. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1193 OF 2020 THE EX. ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT STRENGTHENING DIVISION, OMERGA AND ORS VERSUS RAJARAM DADARAO WADANE … CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATE : 19.08.2026 PER COURT :- ( 2 ) 948 CA 8963 OF 2026 2 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8963 OF 2026 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8964 OF 2026 . These applications are filed for withdrawal of the balance amount pending in this Court after the earlier withdrawal. The award amount was deposited by the acquiring body with this Court, out of which 75% of the amount is already withdrawn by the claimants. The present applications are the successive applications seeking withdrawal of the balance amount.

2. Learned Advocate for the applicants relies upon the order dated 25.04.2025 passed by this Court in Civil Application No.4359 of 2025 in First Appeal No.1179 of 2020. She submits that the applicants had withdrawn 50% of the amount by furnishing an undertaking before this Court and 25% of the amount by furnishing solvent surety. It is further submitted that for withdrawal of the balance amount, the applicants are ready to furnish solvent surety. 3. Learned Advocate for the acquiring body fairly accepts that by the order dated 25.04.2025, this Court had permitted withdrawal of the balance amount upon furnishing solvent surety. Needless to mention, the cited case arises out of the same land acquisition proceedings. ( 3 ) 948 CA 8963 OF 2026 2 4. In view of the above, and for the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed. 5. The applicants are permitted to withdraw the balance amount pending in this Court out of the amount deposited by the acquiring body. Needless to mention, the said withdrawal shall include the interest accrued thereon, subject to production of solvent security by the applicants to the satisfaction of the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] PRW